![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess
Olber's Paradox - why is the sky at night dark this can be used to understand some things about how God made the universe - like how big is the universe - how old is the universe - is space expanding it is not just light from the surface of a star - the same thing applies to - gravity - neutrinos - electric fields - magnetic fields - tidal forces why is the sky not as hot as the surface of a star - why is the gravity that people see not as strong as the gravity at the surface of a star - why is the number of neutrinos that are going through people not equal to the number of neutrinos at the surface of a star - why is the magnetic field going through the universe that is hitting people not equal to a magnetic field at the surface of a star - why do people not see extreme tidal forces caused by mass and energy of the universe it is simple to use these things to explain some things about how God made the universe Kurt Stocklmeir |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Note subject change.
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 09:42:07 -0700, kurtstocklmeir wrote: I guess Olber's Paradox - why is the sky at night dark The sky at night is *not* entirely dark. [1] Astronomers are very worried about light pollution, which broadly characterized is a reflection of light from the top of the atmosphere (if one can construe the atmosphere as having a top) from such things as streetlights and parking lot lights, and maybe an occasional searchlight (which nowadays is only used for advertising). [2] The microwave background radiation is a mottled but generally uniform "light" which appears in any direction of the sky. [3] I for one would assume that there is some light generated from the actions of whizzing subatomic particles at any latitude; the effect is only visible to the naked eye near the poles because there's far more particles there (courtesy of Earth's magnetic field and the solar wind), but a simple counter can be used to count muons at any latitude -- and at any altitude. this can be used to understand some things about how God made the universe - like how big is the universe - how old is the universe - is space expanding it is not just light from the surface of a star - the same thing applies to - gravity - neutrinos - electric fields - magnetic fields - tidal forces Ah, yes, the old "infinite Universe yields a very bright sky" problem. I for one would think that this is of mathematical interest only, but it's clear that the sky, while not dark, is nowhere near as bright as the surface of the Sun (or any other true star) either, though it might be construed as bright as the surface of the expanding Universe a few trillion trillion trillion ... trillionth seconds in its existence, scaled downwards because of the immense size of the imaginary sphere of appropriate radius, about 15 billion light years. why is the sky not as hot as the surface of a star - why is the gravity that people see not as strong as the gravity at the surface of a star - why is the number of neutrinos that are going through people not equal to the number of neutrinos at the surface of a star - why is the magnetic field going through the universe that is hitting people not equal to a magnetic field at the surface of a star - why do people not see extreme tidal forces caused by mass and energy of the universe it is simple to use these things to explain some things about how God made the universe Yes, the Universe is finite, and stars have a finite lifetime. So? Kurt Stocklmeir -- #191, It's still legal to go .sigless. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
QUANTIUM BEINGS OF PURE QUANTIUM LOVE ( CLASSIFIED ) CODE: 455 | switzerland qunatium computer | Space Shuttle | 0 | January 13th 06 06:46 PM |
Why Pure O2 at 5 PSI? | Proponent!!!N0_SP@[email protected] | Technology | 4 | December 7th 05 10:22 PM |
Bulk Metallic Glass (Pure Zr) | sanman | Policy | 1 | July 17th 04 05:05 PM |
Problem with SCTs versus pure mirror systems | Richard | Amateur Astronomy | 76 | February 21st 04 01:56 AM |
Seen an object of pure metal | Tom R. Rastell | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | November 2nd 03 09:39 AM |