![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
bob wrote:
That would be disappointing, since Celestron sells the 9.25 on an EQ-5 mount. If the mount is not up to the task, they shouldn't sell it as a package. To put this into perspective, I actually had no major grievances using the C9.25 on an older Celestron/Vixen GP mount with wood legs and manual slow motion controls (no motors) for globular and galaxy observing (180x and 97x). (It was certainly easier to carry out fully assembled than with the AS-CG5.) Now consider that the AS series CG5 is more robust than the old, tried and true Vixen GP. It's plenty enough mount for the C9.25 for visual deep sky use. For planets it would be nice to have a motorized focuser for powers over 200x to reduce vibrations while critical focusing, but that's almost always true without _over-mounting_ any scope. I also had the C9.25 up on a G11 and it was rock solid (aka over mounted for visual, and well matched for imaging). The C11 on the other hand is certainly over the limit for sensible use on the AS-CG5, except maybe at low powers. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Celestron vs Celestron Pacific | Mean Mr Mustard | Amateur Astronomy | 31 | April 23rd 05 10:09 AM |
Orange Country Register: Celestron Down, Meade Sinking | RMOLLISE | Amateur Astronomy | 38 | April 6th 05 04:24 AM |
Celestron settles with Meade | Edward | Amateur Astronomy | 24 | July 14th 04 08:48 PM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Clayton E. Cramer | Amateur Astronomy | 12 | December 20th 03 07:02 AM |
Has anyone done a comparison of the Photon Instruments 127mm refractor with the Celestron and Meade 6" refractors? | Bob Midiri | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | December 6th 03 06:13 PM |