A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Warhol the polymoron demonstrated how stupid he
really is in broad daylight:

JC schreef:

dre b wrote:

That's a bright idea. Only one minor problem, and that is many
of NASA's alleged "men-on-the-moon" photos reveal non-parallel
shadows. If nothing else, this proves that more than one light
source was present when said photos were taken. I suppose that
we could pick through the NASA photos, and use only those that
show one consistent parallel light source, for what it's worth.


watch the shadows on a sunny day,shadows do not
align perfectly,so why should it on the moon...


Why do these idiots trot out the same, old, debunked whacko notions?

It's called willful ignorance. A tool of fools.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_...ns#Examining_h
oa
x_believers.27_arguments

Examining hoax believers' arguments


I responded to this... BS about moon landing!

Wikipedia's bull c r a p landing only on their a s s! Every claim they
made has been debunked time and time again. They have been answered;
they've been debunked, sliced, diced, and pureed, ad nauseum, so I see
they are not valid answers. Who are these people anyway - agents of
NASA ?

Ko0k.

these Wikipedia guys are complete idiots or they are real astronauts?
Judge the actual scientific evidence. To me the answer is clear the
moonlandings are complete bull s h i t.

See above.

That is plain fact NASA were in it for propaganda the official version
that is pure c r a p,100% pure c r a p in fact!

See above.

the actual evidence is answerable. It was a media production plain and
simple!
Let's start with the Van Allen Belt. What do you say about that ?
Really, it's ridiculous who is asking the scientific questions, and who
is actually answering them ? Nobody!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.clavius.org/envrad.html

It's a massive fraud plain and simple from 1000 different angles all
saying the same thing!

Ko0k.

start to watch "A Funny Thing Happened on the way to the Moon"

Ko0k.

Let the facts speak for themselves.
JC have you seen the video about the astronauts being interviewed and
what did you think about the astronauts?
They are so used to lying it's incredible that have been lying for 40
years!!!
JC and what about the other film 'A funny thing happened on the way to
the Moon' ?
The whole thing is a scam, a hoax, and a fraud these astronauts are not
specially clever people - they are actually quite stupid!!!

They were highly trained test pilots, America's best and brightest.
You, of course, are such a polymoron that you can't understand this.

http://www.csicop.org/articles/20021018-aldrin/

So how did they escape the Van Allen Belt ? Just that one for a start
???
JC the truth is that in 1969 they made virtually no provision for the
Van Allen Belt. Their Module were made of sheet aliminum!!!

http://www.clavius.org/envrad.html

1. Apollo 14 astronaut Allen Shepard played golf on the Moon. In front
of a worldwide TV audience, Mission Control teased him about slicing
the ball to the right. Yet a slice is caused by uneven air flow over
the ball. The Moon has no atmosphere and no air.

It was a joke, you idiot.

2. A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Landerlifting off
the Moon. Who did the filming?

Mission control operated the camera located on the Rover. The 1969
version of a webcam, you fool.

3. One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong
about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have
been lying on the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the
Moon, then who took the shot?

What an idiotic question. Either Armstrong or Aldrin came back to the
spot and took the photo after the fact.

4. The pressure inside a space suit was greater than inside a football.
The astronauts should have been puffed out like the Michelin Man, but
were seen freely bending their joints.

Another stupid one.

http://www.clavius.org/techsuit.html

5. The Moon landings took place during the Cold War. Why didn't America
make a signal on the moon that could be seen from earth? The PR would
have been phenomenal and it could have been easily done with magnesium
flares.

Idiot. This one is so stupid it doesn't even rate an answer.

6. Text from pictures in the article said that only two men walked on
the Moon during the Apollo 12 mission. Yet the astronaut reflected in
the visor has no camera. Who took the shot?

Are you really this dense? You might try educating yourself just a tad
prior to shooting your mouth off like this in public.

Your first clue, see if you can find the right answer:

Where were the astronaut's cameras located?

7. The flags shadow goes behind the rock so doesn't match the dark line
in the foreground, which looks like a line cord. So the shadow to the
lower right of the spaceman must be the flag. Where is his shadow? And
why is the flag fluttering if there is no air or wind on the moon?

http://www.clavius.org/trrnshdow.html

8. How can the flag be brightly lit when its side is to the light? And
where, in all of these shots, are the stars?

Now you sound like the Guthball.

9. The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made
a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of
the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it
has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have
created a small crater, yet the booster looks like it's never been
fired.

http://www.clavius.org/gravdust.html

10. According to NASA a total of 5771 still Photographs were supposedly
taken on the moon when Neil Armstrong went there. The number of minutes
the astronauts were supposedly on the moon in that mission was 4834
minutes. More than one every 60 seconds. How do they explain this...

Got a reference for this delusion?

"Did The USA really go to the moon? Warhol vs. the Moon People"

Idiot.

And, also, I, as always, am open minded about everything, too.

Hahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

i don't
like those moon people, and i don't trust them - but they didn't
convince me about this...even tentatively,

You should just go back and start at square one, fool:

http://www.clavius.org/

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"Get a rope! Say did you see on the National news about a
'Cross burning' in Arkansas? The black guy was scared
****less."
-- "Honest" John the crackah without a brain