A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 8th 06, 09:39 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks
Warhol[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,588
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification


Phineas T Puddleduck schreef:

On 8/7/06 21:16, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:

Just connect the dots... the criminals remain the same tru history
anyway...

The famous "first human path on the moon" in the Warhol World...

Is impossible! For to print a foothprint like that in the moon dust,
you need moisture and there is NO moisture on the moon!


Your knowledge of science is breahtaking in its scope. As in, narrowness of
them.


oops and you bitch are ugly! HAH...


Here is the picture from "moon landing " expedition.

http://www.primeline-america.com/moon-ldg/

Personally, I like the best the moon scooter with that radial (inverted
parasol-like) antenna, wow, that's cute... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Halo
alpha papa tango charly we are riding on the Moon... hi hi hi the
American dream... you take your car everywhere with you...even to the
moon... aint that a funny joke.


Whats it like being an utter ****wit, Warhol? Riding the tails of the space
cadets...


--


Also, have you ever compared the "moon" videos space combinations to
those that are used actually and then in lower orbit?

With the solar eruptions that occured during that first "moon mission"
the astronauts would had their DNA fried...

  #2  
Old July 8th 06, 09:40 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks
Phineas T Puddleduck[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 310
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on themoon - photogrammetric rectification




On 8/7/06 21:39, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:


Also, have you ever compared the "moon" videos space combinations to
those that are used actually and then in lower orbit?

With the solar eruptions that occured during that first "moon mission"
the astronauts would had their DNA fried...


When you get your science from Brad "kooky" Guth, I'm not surprised you come
up with such ill educated bull****.

--

Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
Corollary -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
³It approaches the asymptote faster, the more Œpseduos¹ you throw in your
formulas.²
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orange jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson
Why parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE
SCIENCE". Pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+




  #4  
Old July 9th 06, 05:45 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 679
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
When you get your science from Brad "kooky" Guth, I'm not surprised you come
up with such ill educated bull****.


Now why on Earth would you say that, especially since I'm such a warm
and fuzzy nice guy.

My physics and of the best available hard-science that's easily
replicated is supposedly the very same as that of Einstein. Are you
calling Einstein of "ill educated bull****"?

It seems as though your the one that topic/author stalking, bashing and
summarily hijacking such into your personal Usenet cesspools where
other Jews collaborate with your Third Reich. Why is that?
-
Brad Guth

  #5  
Old July 9th 06, 07:25 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.astro,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,280
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Brad Guth wrote:

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
When you get your science from Brad "kooky" Guth, I'm not surprised you come
up with such ill educated bull****.


Now why on Earth would you say that, especially since I'm such a warm
and fuzzy nice guy.

My physics and of the best available hard-science that's easily
replicated is supposedly the very same as that of Einstein. Are you
calling Einstein of "ill educated bull****"?

It seems as though your the one that topic/author stalking, bashing and
summarily hijacking such into your personal Usenet cesspools where
other Jews collaborate with your Third Reich. Why is that?


Have you learned what color temperature is yet, Brad?
-
Brad Guth


--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development
  #6  
Old July 9th 06, 12:07 AM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.astro
Art Deco[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,280
Default A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification

Warhol wrote:

Phineas T Puddleduck schreef:

On 8/7/06 21:16, in article
, "Warhol"
wrote:

Just connect the dots... the criminals remain the same tru history
anyway...

The famous "first human path on the moon" in the Warhol World...

Is impossible! For to print a foothprint like that in the moon dust,
you need moisture and there is NO moisture on the moon!


Your knowledge of science is breahtaking in its scope. As in, narrowness of
them.


oops and you bitch are ugly! HAH...


Note: no rational response.


Here is the picture from "moon landing " expedition.

http://www.primeline-america.com/moon-ldg/

Personally, I like the best the moon scooter with that radial (inverted
parasol-like) antenna, wow, that's cute... Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Halo
alpha papa tango charly we are riding on the Moon... hi hi hi the
American dream... you take your car everywhere with you...even to the
moon... aint that a funny joke.


Whats it like being an utter ****wit, Warhol? Riding the tails of the space
cadets...


--


Also, have you ever compared the "moon" videos space combinations to
those that are used actually and then in lower orbit?


Note: no rational response.

With the solar eruptions that occured during that first "moon mission"
the astronauts would had their DNA fried...


Oh dear, warslime has been infected with the Guth virus.

[sci.astro added]

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Space Calendar - March 23, 2006 [email protected] News 0 March 23rd 06 04:17 PM
Space Calendar - February 22, 2006 [email protected] History 0 February 22nd 06 05:21 PM
Space Calendar - February 22, 2006 [email protected] News 0 February 22nd 06 05:20 PM
Space Calendar - December 21, 2005 [email protected] History 0 December 21st 05 04:50 PM
Space Calendar - December 23, 2004 [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 December 23rd 04 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.