Which is better to write: Ω or Omega_Total ?

In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you. Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here. He's now including
two rec.arts.sf groups in his screed (which is offtopic evene there).

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you.

No, it is your decision. If you keep printing crap, nobody
who can think well will read it. Nor will they be able
to sift out the posts that may be interesting. It is not
our job to sift out your bull****.

Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here.

That's an arugment that 2-year olds make. "He hit me first".
Ptui. Grow up.

/BAH

In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you.

No, it is your decision. If you keep printing crap, nobody
who can think well will read it. Nor will they be able
to sift out the posts that may be interesting. It is not
our job to sift out your bull****.


This is USENET. As a result, I believe we are all free to read, and
post what we like. I happen to find JR's mangling of cosmology crap,
and I'm arguing against it. If you don't like it, killfile us both. I
certainly won't lose any sleep over it.

Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here.

That's an arugment that 2-year olds make. "He hit me first".
Ptui. Grow up.

Well thanks for your opinion. Duly noted.


/BAH

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you.

No, it is your decision. If you keep printing crap, nobody
who can think well will read it. Nor will they be able
to sift out the posts that may be interesting. It is not
our job to sift out your bull****.


This is USENET. As a result, I believe we are all free to read, and
post what we like. I happen to find JR's mangling of cosmology crap,
and I'm arguing against it.

No, you are not arguing against it. You simply repeat yourself
ad nauseum. You should find the archives, if they still exist,
of real flaming; it is an art form. Your repetition of the
same line is boring and not worth the CPU runtime to open up
and look.

If you don't like it, killfile us both. I
certainly won't lose any sleep over it.

I don't kilfile. I was simply explaining to you that,
if you wish others to read your posts and listen to what
you have to say, then make your posts worth reading.

Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here.

That's an arugment that 2-year olds make. "He hit me first".
Ptui. Grow up.

Well thanks for your opinion. Duly noted.

And, I suppose, ignored.

/BAH

In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you.

No, it is your decision. If you keep printing crap, nobody
who can think well will read it. Nor will they be able
to sift out the posts that may be interesting. It is not
our job to sift out your bull****.


This is USENET. As a result, I believe we are all free to read, and
post what we like. I happen to find JR's mangling of cosmology crap,
and I'm arguing against it.

No, you are not arguing against it. You simply repeat yourself
ad nauseum. You should find the archives, if they still exist,
of real flaming; it is an art form. Your repetition of the
same line is boring and not worth the CPU runtime to open up
and look.

Then don't


If you don't like it, killfile us both. I
certainly won't lose any sleep over it.

I don't kilfile. I was simply explaining to you that,
if you wish others to read your posts and listen to what
you have to say, then make your posts worth reading.


I don't wish anyone to do anything. If people want to read them, they
will. If they don't then they wont. No sleep lost here.

Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here.

That's an arugment that 2-year olds make. "He hit me first".
Ptui. Grow up.

Well thanks for your opinion. Duly noted.

And, I suppose, ignored.

/BAH

Considering your generalisations on Islam, yep they're ignored

--
Relf's Law? -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
"Bull**** repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses."
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Jaffa cakes. Sweet delicious orangey jaffa goodness, and an abject lesson why
parroting information from the web will not teach you cosmology.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Official emperor of sci.physics, head mumbler of the "Cult of INSANE SCIENCE".
Please pay no attention to my butt poking forward, it is expanding.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
PWNER of Vert and TomGee since 2006
"I don't know that much math." - tomgee; 2 April 2006
"I don't claim to know what I'm talking about" - tomgee; 10 May 2006
PWNED

"Puddle**** tou are on my kill file. Good bye" - Vert admits he cannot
calculate \gamma for a photon and admits defeat - 2nd July 2006
PWNED

wrote in message
m...
In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,


This is USENET. As a result, I believe we are all free to read, and
post what we like. I happen to find JR's mangling of cosmology crap,
and I'm arguing against it.

No, you are not arguing against it. You simply repeat yourself
ad nauseum. You should find the archives, if they still exist,
of real flaming; it is an art form. Your repetition of the
same line is boring and not worth the CPU runtime to open up
and look.

Dont do it then. You obviously dont read Jeff's posts. There are hundreds of
Cranks here who you obviously manage to ignore. Why is one more a problem?

If you don't like it, killfile us both. I
certainly won't lose any sleep over it.

I don't kilfile. I was simply explaining to you that,
if you wish others to read your posts and listen to what
you have to say, then make your posts worth reading.

Who decides what is worth reading? Who decides which people are the "worthy"
of reading other people's posts? Are you implying that your judgement of the
value of his posts applies globally?

Everyone has some posts which are more or less interesting than others.

wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
wrote:

In article om_NOSPAM,
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
snip

Some of your posts are interesting to me. However, your habit
of spouting this kind of crap has taken you off my list.

Your choice.

/BAH


I can't tell you what to read. Its up to you.

No, it is your decision. If you keep printing crap, nobody

"printing crap" -- huh?

who can think well will read it. Nor will they be able
to sift out the posts that may be interesting. It is not
our job to sift out your bull****.

Who is "our"?

Perhaps it may be worth
remembering that JR is the one sidetracking here.

That's an arugment that 2-year olds make. "He hit me first".
Ptui. Grow up.

/BAH

Whiner.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development