Apollo telemetry tapes missing?

On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 07:45:02 -0400, mike flugennock
wrote:

Oh, man, c'mon; is it _correct_? You read it on a _Moon_Landing_Hoax_
site, f'cripesake.

Gene Krantz is on camera saying that. He's a good guy.
---
Replace you know what by j to email

"Jud McCranie" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 07:45:02 -0400, mike flugennock
wrote:

Oh, man, c'mon; is it _correct_? You read it on a _Moon_Landing_Hoax_
site, f'cripesake.

Gene Krantz is on camera saying that. He's a good guy.
---
What's even more ironic is that, as described in the following paper, the
original raw downlink of the Apollo 11 EVA has been misplaced.
http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/Apol...SSTV_Tapes.pdf

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:56:13 -0400, "Ami Silberman"
wrote:

What's even more ironic is that, as described in the following paper, the
original raw downlink of the Apollo 11 EVA has been misplaced.
http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/Apol...SSTV_Tapes.pdf

....We discussed this not too long ago after it was shown that fracking
Polaroid instamatics taken of the monitor screens at HSC were clearer
than what we saw on TV at home.

[Makes mental note to check and see if the "kinescope" method was use
for all B&W flights, or if the color ones were NTCS or something along
those lines]

OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:56:13 -0400, "Ami Silberman"
wrote:

What's even more ironic is that, as described in the following paper, the
original raw downlink of the Apollo 11 EVA has been misplaced.
http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/Apol...SSTV_Tapes.pdf

I have the Apollo 11 DVD, and it has it - must be from a different
copy.
---
Replace you know what by j to email

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 02:25:06 -0400, Jud McCranie
wrote:

I have the Apollo 11 DVD, and it has it

....No, it doesn't. Go read that link and do the comparison between the
aired footage and that Polaroid. About 50% of the ghosting and noise
is absent in the raw downlink. Remember, the way everyone saw it -
including those at JSC - was that a normal NTSC B&W camera was pointed
at a monitor, which was necessary because the scan rates for the A11
TV cameras were to different to allow for ease of conversion to
standard NTSC or even PAL/SECAM.

OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 01:53:06 -0500, OM
wrote:

I have the Apollo 11 DVD, and it has it

...No, it doesn't. Go read that link and do the comparison between the
aired footage

You're right. After I read that, I understood the different formats.
The DVD must be made from the kinescope made at Houston of the
scan-converted broadcast.
---
Replace you know what by j to email

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:56:13 -0400, "Ami Silberman"
wrote:

What's even more ironic is that, as described in the following paper, the
original raw downlink of the Apollo 11 EVA has been misplaced.
http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/Apol...SSTV_Tapes.pdf

Thanks for telling me about that - it was very interesting.
---
Replace you know what by j to email