A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 23rd 04, 07:10 AM
G EddieA95
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next?

No one is *immigrating* into Earth. AIUI, the issue is world P, not US P.

"We" means the US.


OK, good correction.

The US is not overpopulated by any stretch of imagination.


Not at present, as far as subsistence is concerned, but then our present
population is heavily dependent on fossil fuels for our energy supply.
Replacing all of that energy with renewable sources will be difficult
and very expensive. Things may get very interesting somewhere around
the middle of the century.

We could lower the American P before then by sealing the frontiers, but that
would not only **** off our neighbors, it would crash the economy. Which is
why it's not done.
  #2  
Old March 24th 04, 03:12 AM
Dick Morris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next?



G EddieA95 wrote:

No one is *immigrating* into Earth. AIUI, the issue is world P, not US P.

"We" means the US.


OK, good correction.

The US is not overpopulated by any stretch of imagination.


Not at present, as far as subsistence is concerned, but then our present
population is heavily dependent on fossil fuels for our energy supply.
Replacing all of that energy with renewable sources will be difficult
and very expensive. Things may get very interesting somewhere around
the middle of the century.

We could lower the American P before then by sealing the frontiers, but that
would not only **** off our neighbors, it would crash the economy. Which is
why it's not done.


Booting out all of the illegal aliens would make a lot of jobs available
and reduce the unemployment rate for US citizens. It would also require
certain businesses to pay a living wage to their employees, which is why
it isn't done. A stable population would not *crash* the economy,
though certain economists who worship growth for it's own sake would
think that the world had come to an end. They've spent their entire
working lives trying to maximize growth, and they cannot conceive of any
other way to live.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 Space Shuttle 150 July 28th 04 07:30 AM
European high technology for the International Space Station Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 May 10th 04 02:40 PM
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) Rand Simberg Space Science Misc 18 February 14th 04 03:28 AM
Moon key to space future? James White Policy 90 January 6th 04 04:29 PM
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 December 27th 03 01:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.