VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, May 2006

Art Deco wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 03:27:51 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:


Art Deco wrote:
On 31 May 2006 23:06:28 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Forwarded to relevant froups:

Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler wrote:

Here follows the one true ballot for the May 2006 Usenet Kook awards.
Anybody may vote, but your votes may be disqualified, mocked, burnt,
shredded and/or recycled for use as toilet paper at the Vote Wrangler's
discretion if:

* you are a notorious net.kook
* you attempt to vote twice
* you vote anonymously or with an unidentifiable sockpuppet
* you vote for or against yourself
* you vote in a thread other than this one
* you vote in a newsgroup other than AUK without crossposting to AUK
* you follow up to an incomplete or altered version of the ballot
* you have explicitly been disenfranchised by the Vote Wrangler
* you have officially been declared non-existent

Crossposting the complete, unaltered ballot is permitted. You have
until 23:59:59 (11:59:59 PM) UTC on June 7th to cast your votes.

Vote wisely; next time the candidate might be *you*.

See also the "How to Vote" Mini-FAQ for advice:
http://www.netcabal.com/auk/voting.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


BOBO AWARD
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

Terry Ortman


KOOK OF THE MONTH
(Vote for one, none of the above, or abstain)

Daniel Joseph Min
Dean Roger Ray, a.k.a. "TeslaCoils"
Joey Jimenez, alias "Colonel Jake"
none of the above
abstain


CLUELESS NEWBIE OF THE MONTH
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Alan Connor
Jamie "Lamie" Baillie
neither of the above
abstain


COWARD OF THE MONTH
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Dr. Andrew B Chung
Honest John
neither of the above
abstain


LOONEY MAROON AWARD
(Vote for one, none of the above, or abstain)

John Lucas
Raymond R Karczewski, a.k.a. "Kazoo teh Convict"
Soc.Men
none of the above
abstain


GOLDEN KILLFILE
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

Honest John


JOSEPH BARTLO "PATHETIC ANAL PINEAPPLE" AWARD
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Joseph Bartlo
Russell B Waters
neither of the above
abstain


BOB ALLISAT MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER
(Vote for one, none of the above, or abstain)

Joey Jimenez, alias "Colonel Jake"
Raymond R Karczewski, a.k.a. "Kazoo teh Convict"
Uni
none of the above
abstain


PALMJOB PADDLE
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Dirk Bruere, Moderator of soc.religion.asatru
Viking of soc.men
neither of the above
abstain


TONY SIDAWAY MEMORIAL "DRAMA QUEEN" AWARD
(Vote for one, neither of the above, or abstain)

Alan Jones
Jayne Kulikauskas
neither of the above
abstain


VICTOR VON FRANKENSTEIN "WEIRD SCIENCE" AWARD
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

tomcat


BUSTED URINAL AWARD
(Vote for one, none of the above, or abstain)

Brad Guth
Jamie "Lamie" Baillie
Robert Griffin
The Big-8 Management Board
none of the above
abstain


BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG WHISTLE
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

Colonel Jake, trained by Pinku-Sensei


VILLAGE IDIOT
(Vote for one, or abstain)

Chuck Lysaght
Kenneth R Pangborn
abstain


HAMMER OF THOR
(Vote YES, NO, or abstain)

spooge




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy


Honest John is up for two awards, but I can't find his nominating posts
or seconds. Can anybody point me to them?

No. Find them yourself, you lazy asshole(s). LOL


Thanks, Art Deco.

I knew I could count on you!

You bet, Double-An

Sit on it and rotate, Deco.

Double-A

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

Art Deco wrote:
Charles D. Bohne wrote:

On 1 Jun 2006 08:13:34 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:

John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

The least we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules.

Rules? What rules?
Their FAQ says that the ballot should not be abused for simple
revenge - and yet all they do is exactly that.

C.

Look, what's that on the horizon? It's a rare sighting of a native
Chuckweasel!

And Deco soils his pants in fear like the silly little coffee boy he
is.

Double-A

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Charles D. Bohne wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 08:13:34 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:

John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

The least we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules.

Rules? What rules?
Their FAQ says that the ballot should not be abused for simple
revenge - and yet all they do is exactly that.

C.


'Tis true.

Double-A

"WHAAAAAAAAAAAA! MOMMY!"

Yes, we all know you're a cry baby, coffee boy Deco. Like the time Sean
spanked you. You cried like a baby for days.

Double-A

Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

OK, we're waiting, Deco.

Double-A

Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

FOB.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 13:40:29 -0500, "honestjohn"
wrote:


"Double-A" wrote in message
roups.com...

Charles D. Bohne wrote:
On 1 Jun 2006 08:13:34 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:

John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

The least we should be able to expect is that they follow their own
rules.

Rules? What rules?
Their FAQ says that the ballot should not be abused for simple
revenge - and yet all they do is exactly that.

C.


'Tis true.

Double-A

One body is safe from "Revenge" Awards as long as there is a GAY Cabal in
charge of AUK! They know that they are wrong but will never change it
because I'm the one that kicked Colorado Carl so hard in the nads that he
ran off for a month! (to lick his wounds).

How about it Colorado Carl, know any more "Rastus" jokes?

Hay, I want to hear those nigra jokes too!

On 1 Jun 2006 20:04:54 -0700, "Double-A" wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

That's the forger you just replied to, you know.

On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:08:42 -0600, Art Deco
wrote:

Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

Fake poast.