VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, May 2006

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"And without accurate measuring techniques, how can they even
*call* quantum theory a "scientific" one? How can it possibly
be referred to as a "fundamental branch of physics"?"
-- Painsnuh the Lamer

"Well, orientals moved to the U.S. and did amazingly well on
their own, and the races are related (brown)."
-- "Honest" John pontificates on racial purity

"Significant new ideas have rarely come from the ranks of
the establishment."
-- Double-A on technology development

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

OK, we're waiting, Deco.

Double-A

On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:08:42 -0600, Art Deco
wrote:

Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

Fake poast.

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message
...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message

...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John
Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i
have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my
underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The
least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Damn, Double-A, pretty soon all the fakers will be posting to each other and
the real posters will just sit back and shake our heads at how lame all this
fakery is. Now faker bots, where will the idiocy end?

honestjohn wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message

...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John
Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i
have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my
underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The
least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Damn, Double-A, pretty soon all the fakers will be posting to each other and
the real posters will just sit back and shake our heads at how lame all this
fakery is. Now faker bots, where will the idiocy end?


Well they say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. It's
kind of nice to think that someday I can retire from Usenet and my
character will continue posting without me! It's especially hard when
you have to decide whether to repudiate a post when you are agreeing
with what the faker said.

Do check the groups in the headers when you reply to these people
because I notice some are cross posting to pedo groups and that
probably is not where you want your posts to end up.

Double-A

"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

honestjohn wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in
message

...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John
Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time
i
have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my
underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on
the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he
ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He
was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The
least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules.
Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy
to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Damn, Double-A, pretty soon all the fakers will be posting to each other
and
the real posters will just sit back and shake our heads at how lame all
this
fakery is. Now faker bots, where will the idiocy end?


Well they say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. It's
kind of nice to think that someday I can retire from Usenet and my
character will continue posting without me! It's especially hard when
you have to decide whether to repudiate a post when you are agreeing
with what the faker said.

Do check the groups in the headers when you reply to these people
because I notice some are cross posting to pedo groups and that
probably is not where you want your posts to end up.

Double-A

Ok, what freakazoid would want pedos loose in their newsgroup?

honestjohn wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

honestjohn wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in
message

...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John
Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time
i
have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my
underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on
the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he
ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He
was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The
least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules.
Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy
to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Damn, Double-A, pretty soon all the fakers will be posting to each other
and
the real posters will just sit back and shake our heads at how lame all
this
fakery is. Now faker bots, where will the idiocy end?


Well they say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. It's
kind of nice to think that someday I can retire from Usenet and my
character will continue posting without me! It's especially hard when
you have to decide whether to repudiate a post when you are agreeing
with what the faker said.

Do check the groups in the headers when you reply to these people
because I notice some are cross posting to pedo groups and that
probably is not where you want your posts to end up.

Double-A

Ok, what freakazoid would want pedos loose in their newsgroup?


bobandcarole for one, or is that two?

Double-A

On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:51:26 -0500, "honestjohn"
wrote:


"Double-A" wrote in message
oups.com...

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Double-A wrote:

honestjohn wrote:
"Honest John" wrote in message

...
Double-A , disclosed in
.com:

.

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one. (John
Lennon,
Imagine)

i am gay and i have a 1 nite stand and its the second time i
have had
sex and when i came home i saw i had some blood on my
underwear and i
think i might have cot something

Go here, Double-A:


A new low, faker!


John, call me a stickler for details, but Art Deco has you on the
ballot for two awards and yet I can't find the post where he ever
nominated you. I can't find the seconds by Lionel either. He was
supposed to put NOMINATION in the title of any nomination. The
least
we should be able to expect is that they follow their own rules. Of
course, Sean broke his own rules when he allowed alt.astronomy to be
nominated for a chess piece too, so you never know.

Double-A

Profound advanced scientific thought process:

1. Saucerhead was unable to search for posts in question.
2. As a result, saucerhead concludes that AUK broke the rules.
3. Announce results with whining.

As usual, clues are in short supply in alt.astronomy.

When are you ever going to get a clue, Deco?

Double-A

And now, the IKYABWAI lame.

--

You are replying to a fake, Art.

Double-A

Damn, Double-A, pretty soon all the fakers will be posting to each other and
the real posters will just sit back and shake our heads at how lame all this
fakery is. Now faker bots, where will the idiocy end?

probably right after you leave usenet, dishonest john.

--
Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
"I can't find my puppy, can you help me find him? I think he went
into this cheap motel room."
-Dave Hillstrom