![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clearly,
our population is much larger than can be effectively accomodated on Earth with our present technological level. That's not obvious. Technology is *not* currently being used in any major way to try and fight poverty (or physical need, which is somewhat more quantifiable than "poverty." Social tools are just as important in this as technological ones. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm, technology can help. Check out "golden rice" some time.
-Lex THX, i will, But I did not say it *wouldn't* help, I said societies aren't really using it in a poverty-fighting cause. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |