Drudge: Spy satellites watch Americans from space

On Wed, 24 May 2006 16:50:26 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:

Eric Chomko wrote:

You have no idea regarding the power of Big Oil. They and their cousin the
Military Industrial Complex own Bush and were the impetus to start this war in
Iraq.

I can certainly see Halliburton/KBR being very keen on the idea,
considering how much money they made off of it.

Patrick, when you're agreeing with Eric Chomko, you might want to
consider stepping away from the bar...

Rand Simberg ) wrote:
: On Wed, 24 May 2006 16:50:26 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
: Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
: such a way as to indicate that:

: Eric Chomko wrote:
:
: You have no idea regarding the power of Big Oil. They and their cousin the
: Military Industrial Complex own Bush and were the impetus to start this war in
: Iraq.
:
: I can certainly see Halliburton/KBR being very keen on the idea,
: considering how much money they made off of it.

: Patrick, when you're agreeing with Eric Chomko, you might want to
: consider stepping away from the bar...

Rand, he's not agreeing with me per se, he's reading the writing on the
wall. Since you're still in the bathroom of that bar, you might try and
read something besides the writings on those walls! ha-ha

When are you going to get that what you say, think and believe isn't the
gospel truth in some manner where you have you seem to think you have sway
over public opinion here or anywhere, especially in the area of politics.

Trying to claim some sort of guilt by association related to me rather
than discuss the content is yet another form of your ad hominem that you
are once again too dense to grasp. But keep this sort of thing coming as
it is my form of USENET entertainment.

Eric

Eric Chomko wrote:


Rand, he's not agreeing with me per se, he's reading the writing on the
wall.


BTW- Halliburton lost money under Cheney's CEOship, so maybe he's trying
to make up for past mistakes.
Here, we see Halliburton proving war is good for stock prices and other
growing things:
http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/c/5y/h/hal
When the war starts, it's at around $20 per share; at the moment it's
down from its $80 per share high to around $75.

Pat

On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:13:01 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:



Eric Chomko wrote:


Rand, he's not agreeing with me per se, he's reading the writing on the
wall.


BTW- Halliburton lost money under Cheney's CEOship, so maybe he's trying
to make up for past mistakes.
Here, we see Halliburton proving war is good for stock prices and other
growing things:
http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/c/5y/h/hal
When the war starts, it's at around $20 per share; at the moment it's
down from its $80 per share high to around $75.

Yes, obviously, that's the only reason we had a war--for Halliburton.

Loosen up the chinstrap on that tinfoil hat, Pat--it's cutting off the
blood supply to your brain.

Rand Simberg ) wrote:
: On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:13:01 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
: Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
: such a way as to indicate that:

:
:
: Eric Chomko wrote:
:
:
: Rand, he's not agreeing with me per se, he's reading the writing on the
: wall.
:
:
: BTW- Halliburton lost money under Cheney's CEOship, so maybe he's trying
: to make up for past mistakes.
: Here, we see Halliburton proving war is good for stock prices and other
: growing things:
: http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/c/5y/h/hal
: When the war starts, it's at around $20 per share; at the moment it's
: down from its $80 per share high to around $75.

: Yes, obviously, that's the only reason we had a war--for Halliburton.

Not just for Halliburton but others that profit from war as well. The ones
that were able to bankroll Bush into the White House. PNAC, Rand, we have
been telling you this for a few years now. Why do you continue to pretend
not to know?

: Loosen up the chinstrap on that tinfoil hat, Pat--it's cutting off the
: blood supply to your brain.

Yep, just call him a conspiracy buff and move on. How establishment of
you. Thanks to dupes like, you Rand, the powers-at-be continue to rip off
all of us.

Eric

On Wed, 31 May 2006 18:37:44 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
(Eric Chomko) made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

: When the war starts, it's at around $20 per share; at the moment it's
: down from its $80 per share high to around $75.

: Yes, obviously, that's the only reason we had a war--for Halliburton.

Not just for Halliburton but others that profit from war as well. The ones
that were able to bankroll Bush into the White House. PNAC, Rand, we have
been telling you this for a few years now. Why do you continue to pretend
not to know?

One of the (many) reasons I think it's nuts is that you've been
telling me this for a few years now.

Rand Simberg ) wrote:
: On Wed, 31 May 2006 18:37:44 +0000 (UTC), in a place far, far away,
: (Eric Chomko) made the phosphor on my
: monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

: : When the war starts, it's at around $20 per share; at the moment it's
: : down from its $80 per share high to around $75.
:
: : Yes, obviously, that's the only reason we had a war--for Halliburton.
:
: Not just for Halliburton but others that profit from war as well. The ones
: that were able to bankroll Bush into the White House. PNAC, Rand, we have
: been telling you this for a few years now. Why do you continue to pretend
: not to know?

: One of the (many) reasons I think it's nuts is that you've been
: telling me this for a few years now.

But did you read it?! Just saying that I'm nuts because I've been
referencing it doesn't make the content invalid, Rand. Do you simply not
believe that PNAC exists, that it isn't bad, or what? Why do you make it
about me when we're discussing a commitee?

Eric

(Eric Chomko) wrote:

:Rand Simberg ) wrote:
:: On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:13:01 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
:: Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
:: such a way as to indicate that:
:
::
::
:: Eric Chomko wrote:
::
::
:: Rand, he's not agreeing with me per se, he's reading the writing on the
:: wall.
::
::
:: BTW- Halliburton lost money under Cheney's CEOship, so maybe he's trying
:: to make up for past mistakes.
:: Here, we see Halliburton proving war is good for stock prices and other
:: growing things:
:: http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/c/5y/h/hal
:: When the war starts, it's at around $20 per share; at the moment it's
:: down from its $80 per share high to around $75.
:
:: Yes, obviously, that's the only reason we had a war--for Halliburton.
:
:Not just for Halliburton but others that profit from war as well. The ones
:that were able to bankroll Bush into the White House.

You mean the majority of the American people? I don't know how to
break this to you, El Chimpo, but Bush collected more in SMALL
INDIVIDUAL DONATIONS than his opponents. The idea that he (or anyone)
can be "bankrolled into the White House" by big companies is beyond
ignorant and ill-informed and well into stuck on stupid.

:PNAC, Rand, we have
:been telling you this for a few years now. Why do you continue to pretend
:not to know?

Because you say all sorts of silly tripe and support none of it.

:: Loosen up the chinstrap on that tinfoil hat, Pat--it's cutting off the
:: blood supply to your brain.
:
:Yep, just call him a conspiracy buff and move on. How establishment of
:you. Thanks to dupes like, you Rand, the powers-at-be continue to rip off
:all of us.

You're even loonier than I thought you were, El Chimpo, and that's
going some.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

Fred J. McCall ) wrote:
: (Eric Chomko) wrote:

: :Rand Simberg ) wrote:
: :: On Tue, 30 May 2006 16:13:01 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
: :: Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
: :: such a way as to indicate that:
: :
: ::
: ::
: :: Eric Chomko wrote:
: ::
: ::
: :: Rand, he's not agreeing with me per se, he's reading the writing on the
: :: wall.
: ::
: ::
: :: BTW- Halliburton lost money under Cheney's CEOship, so maybe he's trying
: :: to make up for past mistakes.
: :: Here, we see Halliburton proving war is good for stock prices and other
: :: growing things:
: :: http://chart.finance.yahoo.com/c/5y/h/hal
: :: When the war starts, it's at around $20 per share; at the moment it's
: :: down from its $80 per share high to around $75.
: :
: :: Yes, obviously, that's the only reason we had a war--for Halliburton.
: :
: :Not just for Halliburton but others that profit from war as well. The ones
: :that were able to bankroll Bush into the White House.

: You mean the majority of the American people? I don't know how to
: break this to you, El Chimpo, but Bush collected more in SMALL
: INDIVIDUAL DONATIONS than his opponents. The idea that he (or anyone)
: can be "bankrolled into the White House" by big companies is beyond
: ignorant and ill-informed and well into stuck on stupid.

Not big companies but a small cabal of powerful people.

: :PNAC, Rand, we have
: :been telling you this for a few years now. Why do you continue to pretend
: :not to know?

: Because you say all sorts of silly tripe and support none of it.

I have backed up everything I have posted. Have you ever read C. Wright
Mills's book, "The Power Elite"? Anthony Sutton's, "The American
Establishment"?

No, you read right-wing rags and shake your head in agreement, and when
you disagree, you write it off as left-wing media, like so many other
dittohead Limbots...

: :: Loosen up the chinstrap on that tinfoil hat, Pat--it's cutting off the
: :: blood supply to your brain.
: :
: :Yep, just call him a conspiracy buff and move on. How establishment of
: :you. Thanks to dupes like, you Rand, the powers-at-be continue to rip off
: :all of us.

: You're even loonier than I thought you were, El Chimpo, and that's
: going some.

Yeah, and you're a stablizing force in the universe. McClod, idiots like
you voted Bush in office becuse of ignorance. Nothing more.

Eric

: --
: "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
: territory."
: --G. Behn