![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Mar 2004, ARNOLDEVNS wrote:
We haven't even colonized the moon outside of sci-fi so it's a bit premature to view Sedna as some kind of development property ![]() Probably will be visited by robot probes within 30 years. I'd bet it's sooner than that. The New Horizons mission that's scheduled to blast off for Pluto in 2006 is also designed to visit Kuiper belt objects. Depending on where Sedna is, it would seem like this would be a logical next stop on this long mission. No way, according to James Osberg, Sedna and Pluto are in opposition, ie opposite sides of the solar system. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No way, according to James Osberg,
Sedna and Pluto are in opposition, ie opposite sides of the solar system. Rats. I was not aware of where the two were in their orbits. Thanks for the info. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |