If the moon landing was faked...

Originally Posted by Brad Guth

PowerPost2000,
There's metric tonnes worth of gold in them thar hills. Meaning that
on both sides of this perpetrated cold-war fence there were tens of
thousands of jobs and seriously big-time financial and retirement
benefit rewards for being encharge of such a grand collective, whereas
such a hoax or not was all that counts, as otherwise keeping thousands
of such highly paid positions at the top that simply would not have
been created and/or sustained so long after WW-II, was clearly their
priority No.1 objective. This is not even to mention upon all of their
religious ruse factors that already had a long and bloody history of
getting their way, or else.

It's not that each side wasn't at the time honestly trying to get
something to/from our extremely nearby moon. Once our first Apollo
mission failed but was having to be hoaxed along in order to look as
though we'd accomplish the task (else funding would have been cut),
then it was just more of the same dry-runs, along with each effort
obtaining more expertise and soft-science with regards to what human
space travels and that task of having to eventually accomplish our moon
actually represented, and therefore the learning curve of appreciating
the daunting task of actually getting something/anything safely onto
that nasty sucker was gradually becoming a reality, that should become
doable as of today, or of at least the near furture of what
sufficiently robust robotics can manage.

Radiation, pesky meteorites and/or meters deep moon-dust or not, just
their own Kodak moments has long since proven as a hard matter of
physics fact that such unfiltered photos were not as such obtained
while upon our dark and nasty moon. So, where's the argument?

The likes of "tj Frazir" and of so many others as having been
sufficiently correct about our moon being one extremely nasty
radioactive plus cosmic/solar reactive place that our frail DNA simply
can not have survived unscaved, but then why not collectively work
together at terminating the likes of NASA once and for all?

This Usenet of incest cloned "Art Deco" types being just another borg
like brown-nosed collective part of their ongoing ruse/sting of the
century, whereas their pagan religious and political skewed agenda has
been clearly based upon a butt-loads of space-toilet infomercial
crapolla, or much worse.

Why are these folks pretending at being so all-knowing but otherwise so
unable or unwilling to contribute to the actual task of informing the
public, as to sharing the information as to how badly they've been
snookered, and that far too many having died as a direct result of this
perpetrated cold-war and the ongoing science ruse/sting of the century.
tj Frazir; all these elements are charged by cosmic rays.
tj Frazir; all these elements are in radioative constant.
tj Frazir; How much radioactive thorium can you stand ?
Russia/USSR since 1959 has in fact managed to have impacted our moon,
and subsequently we've impacted that nasty sucker many times with some
fairly big stuff, yet neither of us have thus far managed to establish
a surviving robotic science package (not that we haven't tried every
trick in the book) that's interactively contributing data as taken
directly from the lunar surface.

Unfortunately, survivable types of impactors having robust micro
circuitry and thus being capable of such methods having provided
suitable data from such science instruments simply haven't been allowed
anywhere near our moon, and as far as anyone knows about fly-by-rocket
landers that simply have not been up to the task of accommodating the
necessary deorbit and down-range while dealing with lunar mascons,
whereas the obvious thin atmosphere and terribly nasty surface
environment limits our options of getting anything of size and mass
safely deployed without such efforts involving some degree of final
impact into the meters deep layers of salty and reactive moon dust, or
having to termiate into a nearly solid basalt crater.

Oddly, the ongoing exclusions of existing evidence, especially as to
our moon's gamma and secondary/recoil worth of hard-X-rays, has thus
far been the status quo of what has been excluded from their
hard-science, as well as having been banished away from the remote
soft-science as published for the rest of us village idiots to read
about, just as were the similar gamma and other radiation spectrum
readings as taken from our privately funded Lunar Prospector. In other
words, it has been impossible that folks encharge of such instruments
as having received these science readings about the existing gamma and
hard-X-ray potential of our moon to have not known about such facts, as
having been in fact playing along with our original perpetrated
cold-war game plan, by way of having excluded whatever doesn't agree
with the NASA/Apollo scriptures and political agenda. The same tactic
goes for whatever Venus has had to offer.

You'd think that this degree of skewed science as having lied it's
butt(s) off and then having ever since been continually involved with
covering thy butt(s) is as bad off as it gets, but it's not even the
worse part of what such dastardly deeds have actually amounted to. The
likes of "tj Frazir" have been sufficiently right from the very
beginnings, yet having become somewhat diverted by way of these Usenet
rusemasters and of their own mindset that wants certain things to be
the case, when in fact so much of science and thus history is simply
skewed beyond the point of no return.
-
Brad Guth

I normally ignore this provocative subject, since there are some of you psuedo-scientists and engineeers bloviating here that haven't a year's formal science training or common sense among you. As a "front-line" Flight Controller in Mission Control and an integral participant for the entire Apollo Program, I will tell you unequivocally that we did indeed sucessfully land humans on the Moon and return them safely to Earth on all the missions so reported. If you continue to believe otherwise, then I can only assume that you're off your meds or are communicating from some loony bin. Or perhaps you desire to sell books to other people with "tin foil hats."
Sy Liebergot
"Apollo EECOM: Journey of a lifetime"

Sy Liebergot ) writes:
Brad Guth dribbled more of his looniness and insanity:
PowerPost2000,
[....]
-
Brad Guth

I normally ignore this provocative subject, since there are some of you
psuedo-scientists and engineeers bloviating here that haven't a year's
formal science training or common sense among you. As a "front-line"
Flight Controller in Mission Control and an integral participant for
the entire Apollo Program, I will tell you unequivocally that we did
indeed sucessfully land humans on the Moon and return them safely to
Earth on all the missions so reported. If you continue to believe
otherwise, then I can only assume that you're off your meds or are
communicating from some loony bin. Or perhaps you desire to sell books
to other people with "tin foil hats."
Sy Liebergot
"Apollo EECOM: Journey of a lifetime"

Mr. Liebergot, Brad Guth is a well known kook whose insanity only
starts at " we never landed on the Moon ", but continues to goofy
**** about Venus ( When he started, his first posted " map of Venus ",
was actually one of *Mars* - really ) that makes lobotomy cases look
like Einstein & Hawking in contrast.

Pay him no mind, for he has none. Plonk the dip****, as most have
learned to do, and everyone, save him, but who cares about him,
will be the far far better for it.

And, kudos for your real work, and the telling of same.

Andre

Dear incest clond borg "Andre Lieven",
What can anyone that's the least bit human have to say about your pagan
Third Reich buttology of skewed DNA on a stick that's so incest
mutated?
-
Brad Guth

Dear incest cloned borg "Andre Lieven" and on behalf of the entire lot
of NASA's MIB/Usenet ****ologest,
What can anyone that's still the least bit human have to share about
your pathetic pagan Third Reich buttology of skewed DNA on a stick
that's so incest mutated?
-
Brad Guth

On 9 May 2006 04:50:37 GMT, (Andre Lieven)
wrote:

Mr. Liebergot, Brad Guth is a well known kook whose insanity only
starts at " we never landed on the Moon "

....Pot. Kettle. Andre.

RE-PLONK
OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

"Sy Liebergot" wrote in message
...

I normally ignore this provocative subject, since there are some of you
psuedo-scientists and engineeers bloviating here that haven't a year's
formal science training or common sense among you. As a "front-line"
Flight Controller in Mission Control and an integral participant for
the entire Apollo Program, I will tell you unequivocally that we did
indeed sucessfully land humans on the Moon and return them safely to
Earth on all the missions so reported. If you continue to believe
otherwise, then I can only assume that you're off your meds or are
communicating from some loony bin. Or perhaps you desire to sell books
to other people with "tin foil hats."
Sy Liebergot
"Apollo EECOM: Journey of a lifetime"



Amen Sy.

Hmm, now of course I have yet another book to add to my reading list.



--
Sy Liebergot

I normally ignore this provocative subject, since there are some of
you
psuedo-scientists and engineeers bloviating here that haven't a year's
formal science training or common sense among you. As a "front-line"
Flight Controller in Mission Control and an integral participant for
the entire Apollo Program, I will tell you unequivocally that we did
indeed sucessfully land humans on the Moon and return them safely to
Earth on all the missions so reported. If you continue to believe
otherwise, then I can only assume that you're off your meds or are
communicating from some loony bin. Or perhaps you desire to sell books
to other people with "tin foil hats."
Sy Liebergot
"Apollo EECOM: Journey of a lifetime"

Thank you very much Sy, well said. I try to ignore this subject as
well, it's just I can't help myself sometimes, I just have to say
something.

Great book too, thanks, yes, everyone must read it.

Now, about that tour of JSC ....

Sy Liebergot,
How many times and ways can you be called a LLPOF brown-nosed borg of
the mainstream status quo?
You and your kind absolutely suck and blow, at delivering nothing but
disinformation and much worse.

Our moon is more than sufficiently radioactive and otherwise it's
rather reactive. The lunar surface environment is not only IR and
secondary/recoil IR roasted to death by day and otherwise sub-frozen by
night whereas Rn becomes LRn if not frozen solid, and it's also chuck
full of nasty gamma and hard-X-rays (especially by day). Unlike
yourself, Kodak film doesn't lie.

The standard laws of physics and of multiple hard-science that's easily
replicated proves that we haven't walked on that moon, not to mention
that you have no such stinking fly-by-rocket lander, not even as of
today.

I normally ignore this provocative subject, since there are some of you
psuedo-scientists and engineeers bloviating here that haven't a year's
formal science training or common sense among you. As a "front-line"
Flight Controller in Mission Control and an integral participant for
the entire Apollo Program, I will tell you unequivocally that we did
indeed sucessfully land humans on the Moon and return them safely to
Earth on all the missions so reported. If you continue to believe
otherwise, then I can only assume that you're off your meds or are
communicating from some loony bin. Or perhaps you desire to sell books
to other people with "tin foil hats."
Sy Liebergot
"Apollo EECOM: Journey of a lifetime"

The only one here that's "off your meds or are communicating from some
loony bin" are the brown-nosed borgs as having been incest cloned like
yourself. Are you actually that snookered and subsequently
dumbfounded?
-
Brad Guth

Brad Guth wrote:
Sy Liebergot,
How many times and ways can you be called a LLPOF brown-nosed borg of
the mainstream status quo?
You and your kind absolutely suck and blow, at delivering nothing but
disinformation and much worse.

See? Although he brought back the "borg" reference and dropped "incest
clone" this time. There isn't a lot of difference.

On 10 May 2006 07:37:32 -0700, wrote:

See? Although he brought back the "borg" reference and dropped "incest
clone" this time. There isn't a lot of difference.

....He finally realized that bashing clones created via incest was, in
fact, bashing himself.
OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[