![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Oberg wrote:
"Even if the engines never work, they are only a backup to propulsion capability usually provided by visiting vehicles docked to the aft port," he explained in an e-mail. "The loss of these engines has no impact on station operations - the Russians were just curious if they would work after so long, and they have their answer." Losing a backup system has always got to be a Bad Thing (although Mir spent nearly its entire life in the same situation, but for a different reason). It makes you wonder what other long-term dormant systems no longer work. The failure of P6's array extension/retraction system would be extremely bad, for example. --Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ted Taylor autobiography, CHANGES OF HEART | Eric Erpelding | Policy | 3 | November 14th 04 11:32 PM |
SINFONI Opens with Upbeat Chords: First Observations with New VLTInstrument Hold Great Promise (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 25th 04 06:10 PM |
Successful test leads way for safer Shuttle solid rocket motor | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | June 11th 04 03:50 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Manifest | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | June 4th 04 02:55 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Manifest | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 12 | April 4th 04 02:46 PM |