Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review

Monkey Boy wrote:

On 6 Apr 2006 15:23:35 -0700, "Brad Guth"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell in message
s.com:

What the likes of yourself (aka "tomcat") see in miniature is not
exactly what I'd call "proof-positive" of other life, but it's
certainly worth folks having a look-see. We'll simply have to think
small in stature in order to appreciate whatever it is that you're
perceiving as intelligent Mars life that disregards the laws of physics
as well as all known laws of biology.

Obviously unintelligent (AKA microbial and/or spores) life can coexist
almost anywhere, including Mars. I have no doubt that of Mars microbes
and spores remain to being uncovered.

These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real discourse
difficult.
Something tells me that you're image interpretations are not going to
go over very well within this "name calling" anti-think-tank of Usenet
naysayism, of which you should feel right at home within such a
collectively negative mindset, especially since you can't fully
appreciate as to what our moon and that of Venus has to offer, much
less having given a tinkers damn about the environment of Earth,
especially of what the lower 99.9% of humanity are pretty much stuck
with.
-
Brad Guth

K00kfight!
K00kfight!

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"An applied ripple action implies time and momentum
reciprocal dependent directed surface tension not
instantaneous field wide reaction."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

Here is a direct quote from BRAD GUTH:

"These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real
discourse
difficult."

I am in full agreement, Brad. I haven't been able to get a word in
edgewise in two weeks.


tomcat

tomcat wrote:

Here is a direct quote from BRAD GUTH:

"These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real
discourse
difficult."

I am in full agreement, Brad. I haven't been able to get a word in
edgewise in two weeks.


tomcat

What? I can't hear you.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"An applied ripple action implies time and momentum
reciprocal dependent directed surface tension not
instantaneous field wide reaction."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

Here's yet another two cents worth of mine that you can quote;

This topic of "Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review" is about
my taking a some time as to review the possibilities, that of ETs
having in the past taken a perfectly logical advantage of our
potentially hollow moon. As such, I can't hardly exclude anything
without hard-science, and because we seem to have so damn little
hard-science about our nearby moon, therefore the barn doors are
remaining wide open for whatever could be the case of our once upon a
time icy and relatively salty proto-moon, that may have been derived
from our very own Oort zone or taken from the nearby Sirius Oort zone,
if not having been extracted away from Venus when the two of those
items more recently arrived into this solar system, or perhaps it's
simply from the happenstance of when we arrived into their solar
system.

Too bad after 4 decades and counting, that we still have not
established one interactive science instrument as deployed upon our
moon. Isn't that absolutely pathetic or what?
-
Brad Guth

Brad Guth wrote:
Here's yet another two cents worth of mine that you can quote;

This topic of "Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review" is about
my taking a some time as to review the possibilities, that of ETs
having in the past taken a perfectly logical advantage of our
potentially hollow moon. As such, I can't hardly exclude anything
without hard-science, and because we seem to have so damn little
hard-science about our nearby moon, therefore the barn doors are
remaining wide open for whatever could be the case of our once upon a
time icy and relatively salty proto-moon, that may have been derived
from our very own Oort zone or taken from the nearby Sirius Oort zone,
if not having been extracted away from Venus when the two of those
items more recently arrived into this solar system, or perhaps it's
simply from the happenstance of when we arrived into their solar
system.

Too bad after 4 decades and counting, that we still have not
established one interactive science instrument as deployed upon our
moon. Isn't that absolutely pathetic or what?
-
Brad Guth



An observatory on the Moon could have a telescope many, many times more
powerful than Hubble. An ELINT (ELectronic INTelligence) unit on the
Moon could canvass enormous areas of either the Earth or Deep Space,
not to mention the Moon itself. A mining operation on the Moon could
mine Titanium, Aluminum, He-3, and H2O. And, with H2O you have, of
course, both hydrogen and oxygen, as well as water.

So, why haven't we been on the Moon for the past 30+ years? I can't
answer that. I can simply say that we should get up there as soon as
possible and establish a presence.


tomcat

tomcat wrote:

Brad Guth wrote:
Here's yet another two cents worth of mine that you can quote;

This topic of "Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review" is about
my taking a some time as to review the possibilities, that of ETs
having in the past taken a perfectly logical advantage of our
potentially hollow moon. As such, I can't hardly exclude anything
without hard-science, and because we seem to have so damn little
hard-science about our nearby moon, therefore the barn doors are
remaining wide open for whatever could be the case of our once upon a
time icy and relatively salty proto-moon, that may have been derived
from our very own Oort zone or taken from the nearby Sirius Oort zone,
if not having been extracted away from Venus when the two of those
items more recently arrived into this solar system, or perhaps it's
simply from the happenstance of when we arrived into their solar
system.

Too bad after 4 decades and counting, that we still have not
established one interactive science instrument as deployed upon our
moon. Isn't that absolutely pathetic or what?
-
Brad Guth



An observatory on the Moon could have a telescope many, many times more
powerful than Hubble. An ELINT (ELectronic INTelligence) unit on the
Moon could canvass enormous areas of either the Earth or Deep Space,
not to mention the Moon itself. A mining operation on the Moon could
mine Titanium, Aluminum, He-3, and H2O. And, with H2O you have, of
course, both hydrogen and oxygen, as well as water.

So, why haven't we been on the Moon for the past 30+ years? I can't
answer that. I can simply say that we should get up there as soon as
possible and establish a presence.

Free clue -- your hero Brad Guth believes the Moon hoax conspiracy
babble.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"An applied ripple action implies time and momentum
reciprocal dependent directed surface tension not
instantaneous field wide reaction."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

On 9 Apr 2006 22:00:27 -0700, "tomcat" wrote
in alt.fan.art-bell in message
.com:

And, with H2O you have, of
course, both hydrogen and oxygen, as well as water.

Really??? Goddam, YOU'RE SMARD!! I am in AWE of your scientifical
nollij!
--
V.G.

"i would blame them it they went on a holy jhiad and killed off all the infidels, would you?"
- AssLexa's "200+" alien-implanted IQ jumps the rails and crashes into a grade school, killing all inside.

Change pobox dot alaska to gci.

Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.

On 9 Apr 2006 13:53:37 -0700, "tomcat" wrote:

Here is a direct quote from BRAD GUTH:

"These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real
discourse
difficult."

I am in full agreement, Brad. I haven't been able to get a word in
edgewise in two weeks.

Really? You actually support Bratty's name-calling? How silly of
you.

ESL!

--
Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B
Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast)
Clue-Bat Wrangler
Keeper of the Nickname Lists
Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order
Monthly Hammer of Thor award, October 2005
"I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely
"****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot."
"ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI."
- Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/afa-b/
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/afa-b/index.html
WWFSMD?

tomcat wrote:

Here is a direct quote from BRAD GUTH:

"These 'name calling posts' clutter up the Usenet, making real
discourse
difficult."

I am in full agreement, Brad. I haven't been able to get a word in
edgewise in two weeks.

tomcat

You, like Bad Gut, have nothing to say.