Brad Guth's Credentials

Brad Guth wrote:
Robert Juliano; Umm... Brad?
you _DO_ realize that your last message sounded really crazy,
don't you?
(crazier than usual.)

Not really because, it's about par for my "crazier than usual"
lose-cannon method of pushing more of those do-not-push buttons.
BTW; if you're going to stalk and bash the likes of myself, in that
case please have yourself a go at others such as Geoffrey Landis.

In spite of the ongoing nasty Usenet and of NASA's gauntlets of
mainstream flak and naysayology, that which only goes towards further
proving that folks like myself are more than sufficiently right
(thereby doesn't mean that we're always right), whereas even "Geoffrey
A. Landis" holds out better than a gram worth of hope on behalf of
other life having existed and perhaps still coexisting as having
evolved on Venus. Whereas, at least technically and even biologically
speaking there's not an insurmountable problem, other than the ongoing
mainstream naysayism that's essentially running us amuck and smack into
a WW-III or bust situation.

Astrobiology: The Case for Venus by; Geoffrey A. Landis
http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/reports/20...003-212310.pdf

There most certainly are other qualified research teams and of their
scientist as having been accomplishing their thing, as to nailing down
another part of what's entirely possible. Meanwhile, the
observationology of what I've discovered as of more than 6 years ago is
still offering the same evidence as before, and to think that I haven't
10% the PhotoShop solutions nor hardly zero percent the resources as
per what our NIMA.MIL has to work with.

I can't but wonder what their true underlying problem actually is?
-
Brad Guth



Brad,

1.) Naysayology isn't a word, and fails to impress anyone.
2.) I am not "stalking and bashing you," I'm attempting to keep the net
clear of kooks and loons.
3.) observationology isn't a word, and fails to impress anyone. If you
want to impress someone, make sure to use actual words. In correct
sequences, with correct punctuation.

4.) perhaps the reason that NASA hasn't found your supposed venusian
civilization, is because it doesn't exist.

Bob

Robert Juliano wrote:


Brad,

1.) Naysayology isn't a word, and fails to impress anyone.
2.) I am not "stalking and bashing you," I'm attempting to keep the
net clear of kooks and loons.
3.) observationology isn't a word, and fails to impress anyone. If you
want to impress someone, make sure to use actual words. In correct
sequences, with correct punctuation.

4.) perhaps the reason that NASA hasn't found your supposed venusian
civilization, is because it doesn't exist.



I want to see him push the button.
I want to see him push the do-not-push button.
The big _shiny red_ do-not-push button.

Commander Ren Hoek

Pat Flannery wrote:


Robert Juliano wrote:


Brad,

1.) Naysayology isn't a word, and fails to impress anyone.
2.) I am not "stalking and bashing you," I'm attempting to keep the
net clear of kooks and loons.
3.) observationology isn't a word, and fails to impress anyone. If you
want to impress someone, make sure to use actual words. In correct
sequences, with correct punctuation.

4.) perhaps the reason that NASA hasn't found your supposed venusian
civilization, is because it doesn't exist.



I want to see him push the button.
I want to see him push the do-not-push button.
The big _shiny red_ do-not-push button.

Commander Ren Hoek

thank god I was trying out a cheap remote keyboard...
nasally ejected hot cocoa seems to do bad things to keyboards...

Bob (on the standard keyboard)

Robert Juliano,
1a) why is it necessary to impress anyone? Isn't the truth all that
matters?
2a) but you are a Usenet kook and a loon (pagan and brown-nosed none
the less).
3a) observationology isn't supposed to be a word because, it's a hard
matter of fact.
4a) perhaps our NASA as well as yourself are simply too gosh darn
brown-nosed to see your own squat.

BTW; there's lots of nifty non-words that are quite usable in the case
against your pagan NASA and of your born-again pagan warlord that
should be tried for crimes against humanity after first being
thoughtfully interrogated by Alkida and Taliban. Punishment should be
death, however being forced into to being a brown-nosed minion to the
likes of Saddam might prove a bit more interesting.
-
Brad Guth

Brad Guth wrote:
Robert Juliano,
1a) why is it necessary to impress anyone? Isn't the truth all that
matters?
2a) but you are a Usenet kook and a loon (pagan and brown-nosed none
the less).
3a) observationology isn't supposed to be a word because, it's a hard
matter of fact.
4a) perhaps our NASA as well as yourself are simply too gosh darn
brown-nosed to see your own squat.

BTW; there's lots of nifty non-words that are quite usable in the case
against your pagan NASA and of your born-again pagan warlord that
should be tried for crimes against humanity after first being
thoughtfully interrogated by Alkida and Taliban. Punishment should be
death, however being forced into to being a brown-nosed minion to the
likes of Saddam might prove a bit more interesting.
-
Brad Guth

1a.) The truth is what matters, and it would be lovely if you'd list
some. At least ONCE.

2.a) Brad, I'm not the one being the loon. I'm not the one who believes
in loony tune things like: "NASA is pagan," "bush is a pagan warlord,"
"we never went to the moon," and the ever-popular "there's life on
venus." All of those are your statements, and all are the utterings of a
loon.

3a.) the word "observationology" means nothing. You seem to be trying to
use it to convince others that you somehow have a better grasp of facts
than the rest of us. Bad news for you: you don't have even an adequate
grasp of facts. Get a clue

4a.) the last statement you gave isn't even worth grading at grade
school level.

The entirety of your "by the way" statement is nothing other than a
cheap attempt to once again deflect attention from the fact that you've
got no proof for your mutterings, and no style to carry yourself.

Now go back to the nice nurse and take your meds.

less than respectfully,

Bob

Robert Juliano,
Good grief, when if ever are you and your naysay mindset going to
honestly contribute to the topic at hand?

Why is your brown-nosed naysayism so encharge of your intellectual
mainstream buttology?

What part of LLPOF is over your supposed all-knowing and extremely
brown-nosed head?

What my eyes are observing right now is that I'm communicating with a
high member of the Skull and Bones cult that's a surviving cloak on
behalf of the incest cloned likes of the Third Reich. Either that or
you're just plain old Jewish and/or that of a brown-nosed collaborating
minion to such. Which is it?
-
Brad Guth

Robert Juliano,
Of what I've subjectively interpreted (aka observationology extracted)
about Venus isn't the least bit brown-nosed nor is any of it based upon
the sorts of hocus-pocus conditional laws of physics that supposedly
got us walking on the moon, with only infomercial-science to show for
it all.

Why are you and the likes of your naysay collective so deathly afraid
of contributing to whatever's so potentially intelligent/artificial on
Venus, and why is it that you're even afraid of sharing as to whatever
LL-1 and of the LSE-CM/ISS has to offer????

Exactly how bogus and/or born-again pagan are you?
-
Brad Guth

"Brad Guth" wrote in message ups.com...
Robert Juliano,
Of what I've subjectively interpreted (aka observationology extracted)

Mr. Guth,

Why is it that for all your so-called observationology extracted about Venus,
you have only revealed one tenth of the actual scope of the alien presense
there? Are you in fact part of the naysay collective of brown-nosed minions
of MIB's, conspiring to conceal the true scope of the intelligent/artificial
structures on Venus? Why IS IT? You are concealing MASSIVE amounts
of information, and I want to know - what sort of born-again pagan are you?

I wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ups.com...

Robert Juliano,
Of what I've subjectively interpreted (aka observationology extracted)


Mr. Guth,

Why is it that for all your so-called observationology extracted about Venus,
you have only revealed one tenth of the actual scope of the alien presense
there? Are you in fact part of the naysay collective of brown-nosed minions
of MIB's, conspiring to conceal the true scope of the intelligent/artificial
structures on Venus? Why IS IT? You are concealing MASSIVE amounts
of information, and I want to know - what sort of born-again pagan are you?



I,

he worships the born-again butt-lover.

Bob