![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More time needed to replace faulty ET fuel sensor
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11825869/ Leaked to MSNBC by NASA person on condition of anonymity NASA to announce at 4 PM Eastern time Matthew Ota |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
good better safe than sorry. Appears they considered launching with
faulty sensors, glad that didnt happen. A few more troubles and RTF can be pushed back to 2007. Wonder what else they didnt fix during this down time? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Haller" wrote in message oups.com... good better safe than sorry. Appears they considered launching with faulty sensors, glad that didnt happen. A few more troubles and RTF can be pushed back to 2007. Wonder what else they didnt fix during this down time? Why is it to take two months to fix the sensors are are there no launch windows in June (which seems unlikely)? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No launch windows in June due to daytime launch constraints. No
nighttime launches allowed due to ascent photography requirements. Matthew Ota |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:48:33 +1300, "Katipo"
wrote: A few more troubles and RTF can be pushed back to 2007. Wonder what else they didnt fix during this down time? Why is it to take two months to fix the sensors are are there no launch windows in June (which seems unlikely)? Nope. NASA wants to launch the next two Shuttle flights in daylight for observation purposes and also have External Tank seperation in daylight for close-up photography in search of foam problems. Those, together with Space Station rendezvous and docking constraints, limit launch windows to two-three weeks at a time about once every two months. Bria |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matthew Ota" wrote in message oups.com... No launch windows in June due to daytime launch constraints. No nighttime launches allowed due to ascent photography requirements. Matthew Ota Haven't NASA heard of night vision cameras? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
with enough launch constraints pretty soon no time will available
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Geez Bob . . . you would be complaining if they were over-riding the
constraints. You, of all people when considering your past posts, should be completely and totally supportive of any constraint that NASA chooses if if helps people to understand the system and as result, reduce the risk. For the other poster, yes, I am sure that NASA has heard of night vision cameras but ruled them out if they ever even took time to consider them knowing that the heat from the SRB's and SSME's would cause the image on such equipment to bloom far beyond the point of usefulness. Blue skies to you all . . . John |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My comment was serious, with all the shuttle issues, they are piling
up, and may eventually cause the program to shutter. for instance major foam loss on next flight might well do it. with the 2010 end date they dont have time to delay RTF to 2008. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:29:46 -0600, Brian Thorn
wrote: NASA wants to launch the next two Shuttle flights in daylight for observation purposes and also have External Tank seperation in daylight for close-up photography in search of foam problems. Those, together with Space Station rendezvous and docking constraints, limit launch windows to two-three weeks at a time about once every two months. Bria Whoever stole my 'n'... I want it back. Now... :-) BriaN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - January 26, 2006 | [email protected] | History | 0 | January 28th 06 12:42 AM |
Space Calendar - November 23, 2005 | [email protected] | News | 0 | November 23rd 05 05:59 PM |
Space Calendar - October 27, 2005 | [email protected] | History | 0 | October 27th 05 05:02 PM |
Space Calendar - August 26, 2005 | [email protected] | History | 0 | August 26th 05 05:08 PM |
Space Calendar - March 25, 2005 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 25th 05 03:46 PM |