![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jonathan Bell" wrote in message
news ![]() On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:35:43 -0000, jkien wrote: Although it isn't an astronomy issue, someone may be able to give an answer: what is the reason for the time delay of a ToUcam (II Pro) when used as a real time camera? The delay on my system is about 0.25 seconds, independent of stream format parameters such as output size (160x120 upto 640x480) and frame rate. I am using the VRecord program. The combination of time taken sending over USB, storing in RAM, buffering and per-frame display on the screen would equate to a near-constant delay. Ah, I wasn't aware that automatic frame rate control was enabled by default, and the imaged object was a bit dark, so each time after I set the (initial) frame rate to a value in the range 5 - 60 fps, it silently changed to about 10 fps after a few seconds. Consequently the real-time imaging delay increased to about 0.3 seconds. The delay is actually dependent on frame rate, after all. At a frame rate of 30-60 fps (and automic frame rate disabled), the delay is 0.2 seconds or less. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UTC - A Cautionary Tale | Paul Schlyter | FITS | 3 | August 8th 05 11:42 AM |
The SRians Said: Time is What the Clock Measures | kenseto | Astronomy Misc | 238 | June 12th 05 01:29 PM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Policy | 0 | February 4th 05 11:06 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |