A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Airforce has had a 2STO spaceplane system for the last 15 years, according to Avleak, discuss?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 8th 06, 03:59 PM posted to sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Airforce has had a 2STO spaceplane system for the last 15 years, according to Avleak, discuss?

http://www.aviationweek.com/avnow/ne...s/030606p1.xml

  #2  
Old March 8th 06, 09:30 PM posted to sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Airforce has had a 2STO spaceplane system for the last 15 years, according to Avleak, discuss?

"D. Orbitt" wrote in
oups.com:

http://www.aviationweek.com/avnow/ne....jsp?id=news/0
30606p1.xml


Late to the party, are we?

It's being discussed in another thread; questions a it is real? if so,
how well did it really work? and why was it shelved? could we use it for
civilian spaceflight/ISS support, etc?

Proof will depend on hard evidence and admissions/revelations from folks
who are extremely reluctant to talk about anything.

--Damon
  #3  
Old March 9th 06, 03:11 AM posted to sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Airforce has had a 2STO spaceplane system for the last 15 years, according to Avleak, discuss?

D. Orbitt wrote:
http://www.aviationweek.com/avnow/ne...s/030606p1.xml



Boeing was granted a patent on Feb. 7, 1989 for a:

" Horizontal-takeoff transatmospheric launch system "

Patent Number 4,802,639

http://patimg1.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=...y=34445BC4AA63

Click on the link. Click on "Drawings". There are a series of
line drawings showing a larger delta winged carrier aircraft and a
smaller delta winged orbiter aircraft.

-Rusty

  #4  
Old March 9th 06, 08:08 AM posted to sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Airforce has had a 2STO spaceplane system for the last 15 years, according to Avleak, discuss?


Rusty wrote:
D. Orbitt wrote:
http://www.aviationweek.com/avnow/ne...s/030606p1.xml



Boeing was granted a patent on Feb. 7, 1989 for a:

" Horizontal-takeoff transatmospheric launch system "

Patent Number 4,802,639

http://patimg1.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=...y=34445BC4AA63

Click on the link. Click on "Drawings". There are a series of
line drawings showing a larger delta winged carrier aircraft and a
smaller delta winged orbiter aircraft.


Thanks for the lonk. I followed the "referenced by" links up, then the
prior art links down, then some "Referenced by" links that came to
another Boeing patent: Patent 6,666,409, 2004.

It's Vertical Takeoff, Horizontal Land of both mothership and 2nd
stage.

Looking at who referenced that patent I see somebody named Buzz Aldrin
received a patent # 6,827,313 in 2004.

He shows a number of variations. Basically a MIRV, one illustration
pictures 6 crew craft being launched at once. His descriptions vary
from Two-Stage-To-Orbit (not counting multiple crew modules launched
simultaneously as each one a stage -- they are seperate powered
payloads) to several stages. Re-entry is lifting bodies, parachutes and
airbags.

  #5  
Old March 9th 06, 03:24 PM posted to sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Airforce has had a 2STO spaceplane system for the last 15 years, according to Avleak, discuss?

In article .com,
Rusty wrote:
Boeing was granted a patent on Feb. 7, 1989 for a:
" Horizontal-takeoff transatmospheric launch system "


Boeing has been interested in such things for a long time, and proposes
them (that is, proposes to build them using someone else's money) at every
opportunity.
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. |
  #6  
Old March 12th 06, 07:09 AM posted to sci.space.policy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Airforce has had a 2STO spaceplane system for the last 15 years, according to Avleak, discuss?

Why on Earth launch each crew member in separate capsules ?

You would lose the advantage of having the pilot concentrate on the
flying, and the other astronauts tend any experiments.

And any EVA would be without any help from the other astronauts.

Regards

Carsten Nielsen
Denmark

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rusty's Reading Room -- q snidely History 2 February 2nd 06 03:08 AM
Ted Taylor autobiography, CHANGES OF HEART Eric Erpelding Policy 3 November 14th 04 11:32 PM
Ted Taylor autobiography, CHANGES OF HEART Eric Erpelding History 3 November 14th 04 11:32 PM
"Face on Mars" G=EMC^2 Glazier Misc 43 January 12th 04 06:21 AM
ESA Sees Stardust Storms Heading For Solar System Ron Baalke Science 0 August 20th 03 08:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.