Secrets of Dark Matter

"Mike Williams" wrote in message
...
Wasn't it Chris.B who wrote:
Wouldn't multiple dimensions require some rather strict
cross-dimensional physical placement? The leakage from even a small
black hole popping up on the dining table is apt to spoil ones
appetite. Surely any cross-dimensional gravitational effects should be
detectable?

It depends how close the next universe is. If the nearest brane that
contains matter happens to be the equivalent of a few tens of thousand
light years away, then the gravity that leaks into our universe would be
smeared out as if it were coming from diffuse invisible sources the size
of a galaxy.

What if the "other" branes containing matter/energy are exactly colocated
with our universe, but "folded up" to sub-Planck lengths and hence
undetectable. Matter/energy "here" corresponds exactly with matter/energy
"there" and what we perceive and measure as our physical reality is in a way
just the tip of the iceberg. The "distance" then is not physical...

Too much wine and not enough maths perhaps.....

"Mike Williams" wrote in message
...
Wasn't it adm who wrote:

My wierd thoughts as well. It's the "rest" of the universe - just in
dimensions that we can't measure or understand right now. If M-theory
posits 11 dimensions, then surely the mass/energy in the non-classical
dimensions has effect.

My thoughts exactly.
In particular, these posts from last year on this group
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.sc...8cf86c6b5fa703
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.sc...62c7056a9a0cd4

Looks like you've though this through much more than I have. Still - it kind
of makes sense to me that if only 5% of the mass/energy of the universe is
currently detectable, then we are looking in the wrong place for the rest of
it.

This is one of the reasons I'm doing an OU degree focussed on astronomy,
cosmology and quantum mechanics - to try and figure some of this stuff out
rationally and gain the mathematical skills to prove/disprove it.

Sub:Secrets of Dark Matter

I wish that the subject should address the issue as
SEARCH BEYOND DARK MATTER.
Inadequacy of present day astronomers in not looking at
PLASMA PROCESS in the GALAXY and Electromagnetic Phenomena can
lead to wrong conclusions.

I suggest the readers to look into alternate COSMOLOGY MODELS in
Research 2003(V Nanduri) :
http://www.ociw.edu/ociw/symposia/se...oceedings.html
Research 2003 Papers by Vidyardhi Nanduri
: http://sd.stsci.edu/astrophysical_la...oceedings.html.
Both these papers help beyond Dark Matter
Vidyardhi NANDURI