![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Derek Lyons" wrote in message ... (Peter Altschuler) wrote: Looks like Boeing is designing this as part of the new lunar initiative. It could easily be added on to the space station as a hab module. I now predict the following... sigh If the new lunar initiative becomes everyones justification for funding their own particular sandbox, we are in real trouble. While I agree with the general sentiment, I feel that using inflatable technology may be perfectly justified technology. This technology has been tested fairly extensively on the ground. The only thing you'd really need is a long duration test flight. Stick one in orbit with a camera and a few other sensors (pressure, temperature, strain gauges, and etc), and leave it there for several years to see how it holds up in space. As has been pointed out in other threads, the expensive part of ISS modules isn't the aluminum can, but the stuff inside. My guess is that the same would hold true for an inflatable structure. Jeff -- Remove icky phrase from email address to get a valid address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TransHab as storm shelter | Henry Spencer | Technology | 12 | June 15th 04 05:17 AM |
Back to the Future? The Command Module Flies Again? | Rusty B | Policy | 280 | February 7th 04 06:49 AM |
Return Of TransHab module | marvin | Policy | 5 | January 31st 04 09:42 PM |
Moon base or ISS? I say take your pick | Abdul Ahad | Space Station | 23 | November 16th 03 06:18 AM |