New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

Sam Wormley wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
"newedana" wrote in message
ups.com...
| http://yoonsphysics.blogspot.com/

Damn,
now that guy is freakin smart!
Step down Mr Einstien. etc..
All newton only stuff basically and all working perfectally.
All I can say is wow!
and that does not come often..

Grats to Yoon!
That is some sweet work.




Gee space****--you gave yoon the kiss of death!


Spaceman & Sam Wormley = Dumb & Dumber.

Poor Sam was born to post and post what he doesn't know and pretends to
know something.

"chan" wrote in message
oups.com...
| Newedena is just so stubborn. Particle labs still detect electric field
| in front of electrons moving at relativistic speed. Why do you keep
| denying that? This alone disproves everything Yoon said. Recall
| Yoon hypothesis is that as electron moves faster and faster, the
| electric field completely lags behind so in chemistry, the electric
| field doesn't have effect, only the magnetic field from Meissner
| effect of alleged superconductor-like behavior in atoms work in
| chemical bonding.

I suggest you re-read.
I do not get the same read you are getting.


| In essence. Yoon work continues where Faraday left off but
| without quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, etc.

And that could be a good thing.


|
| Weird stuff. Try to resolve this issue first Newedena that as
| electron moves, particle labs still detect electric field. What
| can you say about this.

Yoon does not state the electric field is gone.
again, I suggest you re-read.

Spaceman wrote:
"chan" wrote in message
oups.com...
| Newedena is just so stubborn. Particle labs still detect electric field
| in front of electrons moving at relativistic speed. Why do you keep
| denying that? This alone disproves everything Yoon said. Recall
| Yoon hypothesis is that as electron moves faster and faster, the
| electric field completely lags behind so in chemistry, the electric
| field doesn't have effect, only the magnetic field from Meissner
| effect of alleged superconductor-like behavior in atoms work in
| chemical bonding.

I suggest you re-read.
I do not get the same read you are getting.

Do you own the book too? I did. And I regret getting it (cost $200).
It says what I described. Dr. Yoon is very creative. His
model described why the electron doesn't fall to the nucleus.
The intense magnetic field from the Meissner effect separates
the energy levels even creating the ground level separation.
The positive electric field from the nuclues is skewed in
spiral due to alleged time lag. Dr. Yoon believes in Faraday where
fields are elastic. As you know. Quantum Field Theory quantize
the fields by applying QM. Yoon stuff is like some kind of aether
model.




| In essence. Yoon work continues where Faraday left off but
| without quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, etc.

And that could be a good thing.


But this world is ruled by quantized energy, particle/wave
duality, entangement, etc. Maybe Yoon stuff may work in
a parallel m-brane reality where the rule of physics is
different. But not here where reality is some kind of projection
or hologram and things are not what they seem.


|
| Weird stuff. Try to resolve this issue first Newedena that as
| electron moves, particle labs still detect electric field. What
| can you say about this.

Yoon does not state the electric field is gone.
again, I suggest you re-read.

He state that the electric field IN FRONT of moving electron is
totally gone. Particle labs don't support this observation.
Well. Unless Dr. Yoon can show that the space inside the
atom has different rules of physics in that case, the electric
field can behave differently, but this is unlikely. What does it
feel to be inside the atom. It's like standing in the ocean
looking up the sky. Because we are all exposed to the wave
functions of photons from the sky. So is the nucleus where
the wave function (in this case electrons) enclosed it. BTW...
another crackpot called Mccutcheon stated that inside the
atom, the law of physics is different and space is not the space
we know of. Maybe if he works with Yoon, they can come up
with something.

I'm tired of crackpots. If you will notice. They are all newtonian
based, and bolts and nuts. Reality is more complicated than
M-Theory and a completely newtonian model is a waste of time.

chan

"chan" wrote in message
oups.com...
| I'm tired of crackpots. If you will notice. They are all newtonian
| based, and bolts and nuts. Reality is more complicated than
| M-Theory and a completely newtonian model is a waste of time.

If a complete Newtonian model is a waste of time,
Then we are all doomed to the 'virtual' worlds created by math.
and in turn I can fart a universe with enough mathematical play
and enough virtual photons.

I am sorry you do not want to deal with the physical only.

chan wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
"chan" wrote in message
oups.com...
| Newedena is just so stubborn. Particle labs still detect electric field
| in front of electrons moving at relativistic speed. Why do you keep
| denying that? This alone disproves everything Yoon said. Recall
| Yoon hypothesis is that as electron moves faster and faster, the
| electric field completely lags behind so in chemistry, the electric
| field doesn't have effect, only the magnetic field from Meissner
| effect of alleged superconductor-like behavior in atoms work in
| chemical bonding.

I suggest you re-read.
I do not get the same read you are getting.

Do you own the book too? I did. And I regret getting it (cost $200).
It says what I described. Dr. Yoon is very creative. His
model described why the electron doesn't fall to the nucleus.
The intense magnetic field from the Meissner effect separates
the energy levels even creating the ground level separation.
The positive electric field from the nuclues is skewed in
spiral due to alleged time lag. Dr. Yoon believes in Faraday where
fields are elastic. As you know. Quantum Field Theory quantize
the fields by applying QM. Yoon stuff is like some kind of aether
model.




| In essence. Yoon work continues where Faraday left off but
| without quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, etc.

And that could be a good thing.


But this world is ruled by quantized energy, particle/wave
duality, entangement, etc. Maybe Yoon stuff may work in
a parallel m-brane reality where the rule of physics is
different. But not here where reality is some kind of projection
or hologram and things are not what they seem.


|
| Weird stuff. Try to resolve this issue first Newedena that as
| electron moves, particle labs still detect electric field. What
| can you say about this.

Yoon does not state the electric field is gone.
again, I suggest you re-read.

He state that the electric field IN FRONT of moving electron is
totally gone. Particle labs don't support this observation.
Well. Unless Dr. Yoon can show that the space inside the
atom has different rules of physics in that case, the electric
field can behave differently, but this is unlikely. What does it
feel to be inside the atom. It's like standing in the ocean
looking up the sky. Because we are all exposed to the wave
functions of photons from the sky. So is the nucleus where
the wave function (in this case electrons) enclosed it. BTW...
another crackpot called Mccutcheon stated that inside the
atom, the law of physics is different and space is not the space
we know of. Maybe if he works with Yoon, they can come up
with something.

I'm tired of crackpots. If you will notice. They are all newtonian
based, and bolts and nuts. Reality is more complicated than
M-Theory and a completely newtonian model is a waste of time.

chan


chan?
You sounds like Syd, p6, chantal, Zhayne, Qion, Q-on, Qi, Cinquirer, or
Caltechdude,........

Even if you changed your nick again to chan, you're still coward and
sneaking as usual.

You're so-called Qi therapist, aren't you?

You better worry about your fake Qi than physics.

Don't you know that you're a shameless crackpot itself?

Syd (now, chan) wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...182bff8327d7fe

"................ Dr. Hansik Yoon, a man with an IQ of 250 or so (note
a genius has 200) declared the electron electric field move behind it
as the electron moves at near light speed around the nucleus. As a
result, the intensive magnetic field induced in the tail is able to
repel the nucleus resulting in it not falling to it. ............"

Why don't you change again?

Waldo wrote:
chan wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
"chan" wrote in message
oups.com...
| Newedena is just so stubborn. Particle labs still detect electric field
| in front of electrons moving at relativistic speed. Why do you keep
| denying that? This alone disproves everything Yoon said. Recall
| Yoon hypothesis is that as electron moves faster and faster, the
| electric field completely lags behind so in chemistry, the electric
| field doesn't have effect, only the magnetic field from Meissner
| effect of alleged superconductor-like behavior in atoms work in
| chemical bonding.

I suggest you re-read.
I do not get the same read you are getting.

Do you own the book too? I did. And I regret getting it (cost $200).
It says what I described. Dr. Yoon is very creative. His
model described why the electron doesn't fall to the nucleus.
The intense magnetic field from the Meissner effect separates
the energy levels even creating the ground level separation.
The positive electric field from the nuclues is skewed in
spiral due to alleged time lag. Dr. Yoon believes in Faraday where
fields are elastic. As you know. Quantum Field Theory quantize
the fields by applying QM. Yoon stuff is like some kind of aether
model.




| In essence. Yoon work continues where Faraday left off but
| without quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, etc.

And that could be a good thing.


But this world is ruled by quantized energy, particle/wave
duality, entangement, etc. Maybe Yoon stuff may work in
a parallel m-brane reality where the rule of physics is
different. But not here where reality is some kind of projection
or hologram and things are not what they seem.


|
| Weird stuff. Try to resolve this issue first Newedena that as
| electron moves, particle labs still detect electric field. What
| can you say about this.

Yoon does not state the electric field is gone.
again, I suggest you re-read.

He state that the electric field IN FRONT of moving electron is
totally gone. Particle labs don't support this observation.
Well. Unless Dr. Yoon can show that the space inside the
atom has different rules of physics in that case, the electric
field can behave differently, but this is unlikely. What does it
feel to be inside the atom. It's like standing in the ocean
looking up the sky. Because we are all exposed to the wave
functions of photons from the sky. So is the nucleus where
the wave function (in this case electrons) enclosed it. BTW...
another crackpot called Mccutcheon stated that inside the
atom, the law of physics is different and space is not the space
we know of. Maybe if he works with Yoon, they can come up
with something.

I'm tired of crackpots. If you will notice. They are all newtonian
based, and bolts and nuts. Reality is more complicated than
M-Theory and a completely newtonian model is a waste of time.

chan


chan?
You sounds like Syd, p6, chantal, Zhayne, Qion, Q-on, Qi, Cinquirer, or
Caltechdude,........

Even if you changed your nick again to chan, you're still coward and
sneaking as usual.


What? I can't be coward because I don't have any model to defend.
I just love changing nicks because goggle is archives here and
elsewhere and don't want people to see the hundreds of thousands
of questions I asked for years. Also to get slip past kill files. For
example. Sam Wormley killed file me several times. But when
I asked normal questions. He answered and gave good info
which he couldn't. Anyway. I was lucky I was here the previous
years when the legends were still with us.. Legends such as
Franz Heymann, Uncle Al, Bjoern, etc. I got so many stuff from
them and cherished every moment with them til they are gone. Right
now. I'm on my own with the conceptual basics in place. The next
territory I'd venture is microbiology. Therefore farewell for a while.
Call me whatever you want. I don't mind. What is important is the
valuable info I gained here. Also about qi. What is qi? I guess it's
just oxygen which ancients call qi.

chan


You're so-called Qi therapist, aren't you?

You better worry about your fake Qi than physics.

Don't you know that you're a shameless crackpot itself?

Syd (now, chan) wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...182bff8327d7fe

"................ Dr. Hansik Yoon, a man with an IQ of 250 or so (note
a genius has 200) declared the electron electric field move behind it
as the electron moves at near light speed around the nucleus. As a
result, the intensive magnetic field induced in the tail is able to
repel the nucleus resulting in it not falling to it. ............"

Why don't you change again?

chan wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
"newedana" wrote in message
ups.com...
| http://yoonsphysics.blogspot.com/

Damn,
now that guy is freakin smart!
Step down Mr Einstien. etc..
All newton only stuff basically and all working perfectally.
All I can say is wow!
and that does not come often..

Grats to Yoon!
That is some sweet work.


Newedena is just so stubborn. Particle labs still detect electric field
in front of electrons moving at relativistic speed. Why do you keep
denying that? This alone disproves everything Yoon said. Recall
Yoon hypothesis is that as electron moves faster and faster, the
electric field completely lags behind so in chemistry, the electric
field doesn't have effect, only the magnetic field from Meissner
effect of alleged superconductor-like behavior in atoms work in
chemical bonding.

In essence. Yoon work continues where Faraday left off but
without quantum mechanics, quantum field theory, etc.

Weird stuff. Try to resolve this issue first Newedena that as
electron moves, particle labs still detect electric field. What
can you say about this.

Anyway. How's Dr. Hwang. Your fellow countryman. He has
already successfully cloned a dog but why did he have to lie
about the stem cell thing that costs his entire research and
anger from around the world. It has moved stem cell
research backward.

chan


chan?
You sounds like Syd, p6, chantal, Zhayne, Qion, Q-on, Qi, Cinquirer, or
Caltechdude, .......

Even if you changed your nick again to chan, you're still coward and
sneaking as usual.

You're so-called Qi therapist, aren't you?

You better worry about your fake Qi than physics.

Syd (now, chan) wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...182bff8327d7fe

"................ Dr. Hansik Yoon, a man with an IQ of 250 or so (note
a genius has 200) declared the electron electric field move behind it
as the electron moves at near light speed around the nucleus. As a
result, the intensive magnetic field induced in the tail is able to
repel the nucleus resulting in it not falling to it. ............"

chan wrote:
[snip]
What? I can't be coward because I don't have any model to defend.
I just love changing nicks because goggle is archives here and
elsewhere and don't want people to see the hundreds of thousands
of questions I asked for years. Also to get slip past kill files. For
example. Sam Wormley killed file me several times. But when
I asked normal questions. He answered and gave good info
which he couldn't. Anyway. I was lucky I was here the previous
years when the legends were still with us.. Legends such as
Franz Heymann, Uncle Al, Bjoern, etc. I got so many stuff from
them and cherished every moment with them til they are gone. Right
now. I'm on my own with the conceptual basics in place. The next
territory I'd venture is microbiology. Therefore farewell for a while.
Call me whatever you want. I don't mind. What is important is the
valuable info I gained here. Also about qi. What is qi? I guess it's
just oxygen which ancients call qi.

chan

[snip]

Hey, chan, Cinquirer, p6, Zhayne, Qion, Q-on, Qi, Syd, chantal,
Caltechdude, or Charlie,......

Don't you remember how often you talked of crackpot Qi?

Cinquirer (now, chan) wrote:
Qi: Standard Model Extension or Fifth Force?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...fe6fd98eaa39a3
"...... I have extensive experiences with Qi numbering over a decade
with thousands of subjects and Qi healers from all over the world.
After months looking in physics group and internet for the atomic model
that can explain the physics of Qi and non_local effects. I have
encountered numerous models that attempt to describe it. But it always
falls short of the complete answer. Maybe the truth is a combination of
them......"

zhayne (now, chan) wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...4cf95983?hl=en
"First of all. There is qi. If there is no qi. I won't be here
struggling to find the answers. If there is no qi. I won't be meeting
you and we won't be having this conversation. But there is qi. We
techno-occult sorcerers know because details are so important to
us....."

Do you need more crackpot Qi?

Cliff Wilusk wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
"newedana" wrote in message
ups.com...
| http://yoonsphysics.blogspot.com/

Damn,
now that guy is freakin smart!
Step down Mr Einstien. etc..
All newton only stuff basically and all working perfectally.
All I can say is wow!
and that does not come often..

Grats to Yoon!
That is some sweet work.



It's interesting Spaceman doesn't know what happened in the space. ^ ^
Are you earthman or idiot??
Don't pretend to know something, lonely Spaceman.

Space is an earthman's dream.

According to Dr. Yoon's new physics(www.yoonsphysics.blogspot.com). the sun contains still a great amount of neutron, in respect to its average density 100g/cc.

Allegedly, neutron decomposes by β-decay to produce a proton and an
electron to build a hydrogen atom, releasing energy. Since inside of
the sun is a supercritical environment of ultra high temperature and
pressure, a proton produced by β-decay combines another neutron
nearby and it turns out to build a deuteron. Deuterons thus made are
also possible to bind themselves to construct a helium nucleus in such
a supercritical environment. Thus deutrons inside the sun becomes a
fundamental building block of 92 kinds of all the natural atomic nuclei
found on the earth.

One proton → one hydrogen nucleus
One proton + one neutron → 1 deuteron
two deuterons → one helium nucleus
Three deuterons + one neutron → one lithium nucleus
four deuterons + one neutron → one beryllium nucleus
5 deuterons + one neutron → one boron nucleus
6 deuterons → one carbon nucleus
7 deuterons → one nitrogen nucleus
8 deuterons → one oxygen nucleus
9 deuterons + one neuron → one fluorine nucleus
10 deuterons → one neon nucleus
11 deutrons + one neutron → one sodium nucleus
12 deuterons → one magnesium nucleus
13 deuterons + one neutron → one aluminium nucleus
14 deuterons → one silicon nucleus
15 deuterons + one neutron → one phosphorous nucleus
16 deuterons → one sulfur nucleus
17 deuterons + one neutron → one chlorine nucleus
18 deuterons + 4 neutrons → one argon nucleus
19 deuterons + one neutron → one potassium nucleus
20 deuterons → one calcium nucleus
. . . . . . . . . . .
26 deuterons + 4 neutrons → one iron nucleus
27 deuteron + 5 neutron → one cobalt nucleus
28 deuterons + 3 neutrons → one nickle nucleus
29 deuterons + 6 neutrons → one copper nucleus
. . . . . . . . .
88 deuterons + 50 neutrons → one radium nucleus
. . . . . . . . . . .
92 deuterons + 51 neutrons → one uranium (235) nucleus
92 deuterons + 54 neutrons → one uranium (238) nucleus

Dr. Yoon's physics(www.yoonsphysics.blogspot.com) defines that the
force of binding protons by nuclear electron ring in atomic nuclei is
the nuclear strong forces. The energy of the sun and stars is not the
nuclear fusion of hydreogen or deuterium distributed in the cosmic
space, but is the energy emitted when formation of a variety of element
atoms from neutrons in the sun and strs.

One obvious fact is that atomic structure requires more extra neutrons
to stabilize it as atomic number increases. In the case of heavy atomic
nuclei a large number of excess neutrons is required to construct a
stable nuclear structures. Particularly, in the case of radioactive
nuclei more than 50 neutrons are required to build their nuclei, but
their structure is still unstable and decomposes very slowly, radiating
α,β, and γ-rays.

Based on this fact we can reasonably predict that these radioactive
nuclei can not be built by nuclear fusion of deuterium or helium,
distributed in the cosmic space as believed today, because it conflicts
with the natural law.

We can also understand that why the nuclear fusion of deuterons to
build a helium nucleus requires such an unusual reaction environment of
ultra high temperature and pressure, as that inside of the sun or other
stars. We should remind the fact that the hydrogen bomb charged with
solid lithium deutrate was detonated with explosion of A-bomb, in order
to simulate such reaction environment of the sun. newedana