![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael Ejercito wrote: Jim wrote in message . .. I couldn't believe my ears as I listened to Andy Rooney on CBS' news program "60 Minutes" last night so I checked on the official program transcript and there it was in black and white. In a segment titled "Ground Control To Mr. Bush", Andy Rooney revealed that " Space exploration hasn't produced much for us except some good pictures." and "The moon is like a trip to the mall compared with going to Mars. The moon is 250,000 miles away. Mars is 35 million miles. Scientists have said that it would probably be a one-way trip for whoever made it, because gravity on Mars is so strong that it would be impossible to bring along enough fuel for them to take off and return to Earth. Anyone going there might never come back. This makes the trip to Mars by President Bush especially attractive to Democrats." Actually, an Atlas rocket should have enough fuel to escape Mars's gravitational pull and dock with the space shuttle orbiter. That leaves moving the construction and assembly of Atlas rockets to Mars. The space shuttle orbiters are sufficient for a trip to Mars and back, including the Atlas rocket needed to land and take off from the surface of Mars. the only thing needed is a booster system which could take the space shuttle orbiter and its contents on a trajectory to Mars. Don't you know about "Shuttle to the Moon" or worse, "Shuttle to Mars" and these newsgroups? It's a troll akin to trying to sell Esperanto to the world in sci.lang. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )" wrote in message ...
Michael Ejercito wrote: Jim wrote in message . .. I couldn't believe my ears as I listened to Andy Rooney on CBS' news program "60 Minutes" last night so I checked on the official program transcript and there it was in black and white. In a segment titled "Ground Control To Mr. Bush", Andy Rooney revealed that " Space exploration hasn't produced much for us except some good pictures." and "The moon is like a trip to the mall compared with going to Mars. The moon is 250,000 miles away. Mars is 35 million miles. Scientists have said that it would probably be a one-way trip for whoever made it, because gravity on Mars is so strong that it would be impossible to bring along enough fuel for them to take off and return to Earth. Anyone going there might never come back. This makes the trip to Mars by President Bush especially attractive to Democrats." Actually, an Atlas rocket should have enough fuel to escape Mars's gravitational pull and dock with the space shuttle orbiter. That leaves moving the construction and assembly of Atlas rockets to Mars. Or a spaceship could bring the Atlas rockets to Mars. Of course, a very huge rocket will have to be designed to be able to boost the spaceship and lander to Mars. The space shuttle orbiters are sufficient for a trip to Mars and back, including the Atlas rocket needed to land and take off from the surface of Mars. the only thing needed is a booster system which could take the space shuttle orbiter and its contents on a trajectory to Mars. Don't you know about "Shuttle to the Moon" or worse, "Shuttle to Mars" and these newsgroups? It's a troll akin to trying to sell Esperanto to the world in sci.lang. No, I do not. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Shuttle | 3 | May 22nd 04 09:07 AM |
Breakthrough in Cosmology | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Space Station | 0 | May 21st 04 08:02 AM |
Japan admits its Mars probe is failing | JimO | Policy | 16 | December 6th 03 02:23 PM |
The first human mars mission? | Christopher | Policy | 140 | October 13th 03 08:33 PM |
NASA Selects UA 'Phoenix' Mission To Mars | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 4th 03 10:48 PM |