![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kaido Kert" wrote in message ... "Tom Abbott" wrote in message ... I personally hope NASA can figure out a way to service the Hubble telescope. It is more important than any one piece of the International space station, so if one flight has to be cancelled, let it be one to the International space station rather than the one to Hubble, especially considering that we already have $200 million worth of new instruments to add to Hubble that have already been bought and paid for. How about saving the servicing money and the components and keep them for a lunar version of Hubble ? Is there something urgent to be discovered that absolutely needs to be done this decade ? They won't keep. Besides, a lunar version of Hubble would not be an improvement over one in low-earth orbit. Secondly, no one, but no one, has talked of plans for a lunar version of Hubble. Third, if they won't maintain a telescope in low earth orbit, what makes you think they will maintain a telescope on the moon? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
UA Scientist Sheds New Lights On Outer Planets With Hubble Space Telescope | Ron | Science | 3 | January 26th 04 01:38 PM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
New Hubble Space Telescope Exhibit Opens At Goddard | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | September 30th 03 11:07 PM |