![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scott Lowther" wrote in message
... Pete Lynn wrote: What is the official estimate for intangible benefits from ESAS? Breakdown? In perpetuating the position that space is slow, complicated and expensive, I expect that ESAS will do more to crush the spirit of the next generation than inspire it to greater levels of achievement. I don;t see that. Again, Shuttle is all we've had for a quarter century, and it has been infinitely slower, more complicated and more expensive, for the simple fact that it went *nowhere.* And yet, during the Shuttle era people ahve been interested enough in space to actively participate in the X-Prize. I had been wondering about this argument - NASA acts as an oppressive regime which consequently fosters a rebel movement intent on revolution. Hence NASA 'inspires' that rebel movement. I am not sure how significant this argument is, though anecdotal evidence would suggest that frustration with NASA can be a strong motivating force for many start ups. Would their motivation be as strong in the absence of NASA? Should this be accounted for as an intangible wealth benefit of NASA? Pete. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CRACK THIS CODE!!! NASA CAN'T | zetasum | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 3rd 05 12:27 AM |
Ted Taylor autobiography, CHANGES OF HEART | Eric Erpelding | History | 3 | November 14th 04 11:32 PM |
Could a bullet be made any something that could go from orbit to Earth's surface? | Scott T. Jensen | Space Science Misc | 20 | July 31st 04 02:19 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
News: Astronaut; Russian space agency made many mistakes - Pravda | Rusty B | Policy | 1 | August 1st 03 02:12 AM |