![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jeff Findley wrote: Interest in Apollo dropped rapidly after the successful return of Apollo 11. The same drop in interest also happened for shuttle, shuttle/Mir, and shuttle/ISS. And while Apollo ended in a hurry... Shuttle lasted a quarter century. ISS has lasted years and chewed up an astonishing amount of cash. What's to stop that same drop for Apollo 2.0? What will be fundamentally different so that interest will be retained for longer than the first few flights? What makes you think incessant public interest is vital here? Human access to space does not necessarily equal NASA human access to space. Right. There are the Chinese, the Russians, the... ummm.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CRACK THIS CODE!!! NASA CAN'T | zetasum | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 3rd 05 12:27 AM |
Ted Taylor autobiography, CHANGES OF HEART | Eric Erpelding | History | 3 | November 14th 04 11:32 PM |
Could a bullet be made any something that could go from orbit to Earth's surface? | Scott T. Jensen | Space Science Misc | 20 | July 31st 04 02:19 AM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
News: Astronaut; Russian space agency made many mistakes - Pravda | Rusty B | Policy | 1 | August 1st 03 02:12 AM |