New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
1. The explanation of double slit experiment today uses the Bragg's
law, nλ/2=D sin θ. However it does not say why light can diffract as
it passes through a tiny hole. The light with incident angle 0 against
the double slit plane ( in perpendicular to the double slit face) turns
out to make angle θ after it passes through the double slits. Photon
theory neither defines that photons have to repulse each other, nor
admits that plane wave fronts slitted by tiny holes turn out to build
spherical wave fronts. That is, Bragg's law was built in regardless of
diffraction mechanism of light. How primitive is the current
interpretation of double slit experiment and the the Bragg's law!. The
same is the case of uncertainty principle.

2. Since the light refraction takes place when it is slitted with atomic
nuclei, the star light bending near the sun is not due to the attraction of
massive solar gravitation, but is due to the solar wind containing tremendous
atomic nuclei which make it refract with the mechanism mentioned above.

Ridiculous. Two words: Gravitational lensing.


When the light run to the same direction as that of atomic nuclei
building optical apertures that slit the light, there occurs the
red-shift of light, while there takes place the blue-shift when they
run in counter direction. So the red-shift of refracted star light is
not due to losing its energy as it escapes from the solar gravitational
filed, but is due to the reason, nuclear particles in the solar wind
run to the same direction as that of star light travelling for the
earth. Thus, Albert Einstein's explanation for these two phenomena are
all incorrect.

Imagine there is an light travelling in the space. Do you believe that
this light can change its wavelength or frequency due to losing its
energy? No! It loses only its intensity that is nothing to do with
wavelength. This is the natural science! Albert Einstein fooled and
toyed all of us with his general theory of rlativity.

Yada, yada, yada. When is your Nobel coming?


3. How can electrons be ejected in the Photoelectric experiments if
light is just wave?

Nobody says "light is just wave". You're a century behind the times. Light
is both a wave and a particle. Perhaps if you'd read Einstein instead of
dismissing him, you wouldn't make such a fool of yourself.

In Dr. Yoon's New Physics (www.yoonsatom.net) or
(Yoonsphysics.blogspot.com), orbital electron of atom builds a micro
persistent current ring around its nucleus. When this atomic orbital
electron ring receives an external electromagnetic radiation whose
frequency resonates to its inherent frequency (orbital electron ring
has a fixed frequency determined by its radius), it takes up the wave
energy and oscillates with the same frequency, while increasing its
amplitude.

However if it receives an electromagnetic radiation of a higher
frequency but with non-resonant frequency, its ring form turns out to
be broken and liberates the electron with its revolving kinetic energy
that makes the photo-electric current. The shorter the radii of the
electron ring, the higher the energy required to break it and the
higher the kinetic energy of liberated electron.

It is well known that alkali metals are very sensitive in Photoelectric
Effect, because these metals have the outermost electron rings with the
weakest tenacity against bombardment of radiation energy. The details
are in Dr. Yoon's text(www.yoonsatom.net)

X-rays and gamma rays can also break the outermost electron rings of
atoms to ionize them, since these rays are difficult to be resonate to
the frequency of orbital electron rings of atoms, and have a far
greater energy level.

Albert Einstein explains this Photoelectric Effect, the incident
photons splash out electrons richly filled in the metal structure. How
childish and primitive is his idea! newedana