New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

Dear Lloyd Parker:

"Lloyd Parker" wrote in message
...
In article
.com,
"newedana" wrote:
According to Dr. Yoon's New Physics, light is a continuous
wavelet in character.

If this wavelet is double-slitted

The wavelet has 2 slits?

Its skirt is split on both sides, allowing it to run faster, and
simultaneously show more thigh...

David A. Smith

Particle physicists today blindly believe the de Broglei's duality idea ofwave-corpuscular electron, simulating that light has such a dual characterof wave-corpuscle. However, light is never a flow of corpuscular photons but a continuous wavy entity built with electromagnetic energy.

According to Dr. Yoon's new physics(www.yoonsatom.net), a flow of mass

particles never have such a wavy character unless they have
overwhelmingly a large amount of charges in respect to their mass, and
further they have to move with an adequate speed in respect to their
charge.

Allegedly accelerated electrons diffract at the cystal lattice so they
are simply defined as a wave. However we should know they do not
diffract anymore when accelerated too greatly. Neutrons are the same.
If they move at a fast speed they do not diffract at the crystal
lattice, so they cannot be a wave. Both are all a mere flow of mass
particles.

He says that electric force fluxes and their induced magnetic force
fluxes are not fixed as field lines as believed in the QM theory, but
are mobile ones obeying the motion of charged particles with a time
delay, since these force fluxes come out from them. The evidence
is that electromagnetic waves are built with these time delayed
electromagnetic force fluxes emanated from electrons in their source.

He explains how can take place the electron diffraction at the crystal
lattice. If electrons are accelerated, their electromagnetic force
fluxes given out from them being shifted behind them and they turn out
to perform a longitudinal oscillation which brings about their speed
oscillation to have faster and slower speed phases. It is due to the
elasticity of their shifted electromagnetic force fluxes. Its
oscillation is like a mass-spring system does when accelerated, or air
molecules oscillating in the wind carrying an acoustic wave. If we roll

a glass bottle half-filled with water we may observe such a moving
mode. Accelerated charged mass particles showing such a wavy character
is due to their longitudinal oscillation.

Longitudinal oscillation of charged particles results to generate an
electromagnetic wave in perpendicular to their moving path. The
evidence is that accelerated electrons usually emit an electromagnetic
wave with a given wavelength being determined depending on their
acceleration, the
greater the acceleration the higher the frequency and vice versa. When
electrons are highly accelerated or decelerated in a particle
accelerator they turn out to emit x-rays around their pathway.

It signifies in turn that charged particles have to dump their part of
their kinetic energy as radiations when accelerated. However, ordinary

mass particle without charges do not dump their energy so they can
perform its inertial motion in the free space once accelerated, but
charge particles cannot do the same motion due to their energy dumping
character. The difficulty of accelerating charged particles at around
near the speed of light is mainly due to this reason. It is not due to
the Einstein's reason, mass increases its absolute mass depending on
its speed. This is the
critical difference between charged particles and ordinary mass
particles without charge in their moving characters.

However particle physicists have also blind belief that orbital
electron
performs a standing wave motion around its nucleus, due to the
influence of de Broglei's mass wave effect, and influence of standard
textbook in which electron is treated as mere a mass particle. It says
that the
particle oscillation in a quantum box can build a standing wave. It is
lie! It is a plain truth mas particle without charge cannot perform
such a wavy motion in the space. Of course orbital electron cannot
perform such a wavy motion, due to energy dumping behavior.

Science-dictionary says that the wavy motion is a back and forth or up
and down motion with a definite frequency and amplitude. So a wave
consists of a successive phases with counter characters alternately
changing. How can orbital electron perform such a standing wavy motion
without continuous energy supply?

Dr. Yoon built an equation of hydrogen spectrum starting from a
differential equation of torsional harmonic oscillation of mass, since
orbital electron ring is elastically connected to its nucleus, and
performs a precessional oscillation around its nucleus. He applies the
classical rule of one string vibration instead of quantizing radiation
energy.

It is, Δν=ν0[1/r^2-1/(r+n)^2], where, Δν: frequency of hydrogen
spectrum, ν0: Rydbery frequency, r: radial parameter of electron ring,

n: precessing parameter of electron ring.

These two parameters, r and n change by integer multiples, due to the
frequency rule of one string vibration. Fixing r=1 we can change n, as
n=1, 2, 3, 4, ..... , because r does not change until its energy
capacity is saturated by its energy uptake. Thus Lyman series is
given, including its series limit showing like a continuous spectrum
which was difficult to explain with Bohr's model. The orbital electron
ring shrinks from r=6 downward, r=5, 4, 3, 2, 1 by folding its
circumference in integer multiple ratio, so these shrunk electron rings
become thicker and stiffer in step wise as initial ring is saturated
with energy uptake. Thus 6 sets of
hydrogen spectrums are made possible.

The radial parameter r can decrese to be under unit as 1/2, 1/3,
1/4,....1/r, in the case when the orbital electron ring has to emit
electromagnetic radiation with lesser
wavelengths than Lyman series. For example in the case of hard x-rays,
parameter r becomes around 1/126, and in the case of gamma-rays with
wavelength, 0,005 angstrom it gives 1/430.

In the harmonic oscillation of mass, allegedly its oscillatory energy
is given by
E=1/2kq^2=m(2π ν q)^2, where k; elasticity constant, q:
amplitude,ν:frequency. m: mass. Obvious fact here is that its
oscillatory energy is
in proportional to its frequency square.

From Dr.Yoon's above equation showing hydrogen spectrum
E=T(Δν)^2=T'(1/r)^4, when n=infinite, is naturally given, where T and
T' : constants involving their average amplitudes. Since h is a
constant, the basic equation in the QM theory, E=hν is fundamentally
out of science.

If we estimate the radial parameter of electron rings emitting x-rays
of around 0.1 angstrom due to bombardment of electron, it gives
r=1/126. It is very close to its nucleus (refer that the average k
shell of
metal atoms is very close to their nuclei since their atomic volume is
far less than hydrogen's). Since the energy of orbital electron ring is

reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its radial parameter, a
very slight increase of its radial parameter gives out a huge energy.
For example, when uranium 235 cleaves into two parts to produce two
lead atoms, all of its electron shells have to expand to be lead's
electron shells. This is the nuclear fission energy of uranium atom.

In the case of unclear fusion, the nuclear electron ring of deuteron
expands to be the double nuclear electron ring of binding 4 protons to
make two neutrons and two protons in the helium nucleus, emitting
energy,
as stated in forging post. This is the nuclear fusion energy.

In short, nuclear fission energy comes from the expansion of atomic
electron rings of uranium atoms, while the nuclear fission energy comes

from the expansion of nuclear electron rings of deuterons to be a
nuclear double electron ring in helium nucleus to bind 4 protons. The
Einstein's E=mc^2
which is deduced from the false de Broglei's mass wave equation λ=
h/p, and non-scientific equation E=hν, has nothing to do with the
atomic energy. newedana

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:

Particle physicists today blindly believe the de Broglei's duality idea of
wave-corpuscular electron, simulating that light has such a dual character of
wave-corpuscle. However, light is never a flow of corpuscular photons but a
continuous wavy entity built with electromagnetic energy.

According to Dr. Yoon's new physics(www.yoonsatom.net), a flow of mass

particles never have such a wavy character unless they have
overwhelmingly a large amount of charges in respect to their mass, and
further they have to move with an adequate speed in respect to their
charge.

Then how are electrons diffracted?


Allegedly accelerated electrons diffract at the cystal lattice so they
are simply defined as a wave. However we should know they do not
diffract anymore when accelerated too greatly.

Sure they do.

Neutrons are the same.
If they move at a fast speed they do not diffract at the crystal
lattice,

Sure they do.

so they cannot be a wave. Both are all a mere flow of mass
particles.

He says that electric force fluxes and their induced magnetic force
fluxes are not fixed as field lines as believed in the QM theory, but
are mobile ones obeying the motion of charged particles with a time
delay, since these force fluxes come out from them. The evidence
is that electromagnetic waves are built with these time delayed
electromagnetic force fluxes emanated from electrons in their source.

So your beam of neutrons does what?


He explains how can take place the electron diffraction at the crystal
lattice. If electrons are accelerated, their electromagnetic force
fluxes given out from them being shifted behind them

Sounds like thiotimoline in reverse.


and they turn out
to perform a longitudinal oscillation which brings about their speed
oscillation to have faster and slower speed phases. It is due to the
elasticity of their shifted electromagnetic force fluxes. Its
oscillation is like a mass-spring system does when accelerated, or air
molecules oscillating in the wind carrying an acoustic wave. If we roll

a glass bottle half-filled with water we may observe such a moving
mode. Accelerated charged mass particles showing such a wavy character
is due to their longitudinal oscillation.

Longitudinal oscillation of charged particles results to generate an
electromagnetic wave in perpendicular to their moving path. The
evidence is that accelerated electrons usually emit an electromagnetic
wave with a given wavelength being determined depending on their
acceleration, the
greater the acceleration the higher the frequency and vice versa. When
electrons are highly accelerated or decelerated in a particle
accelerator they turn out to emit x-rays around their pathway.

It signifies in turn that charged particles have to dump their part of
their kinetic energy as radiations when accelerated. However, ordinary

mass particle without charges do not dump their energy so they can
perform its inertial motion in the free space once accelerated,

I remember reading that when the Enterprise comes out of warp speed, it has to
dump its energy too. Good scifi there!


but
charge particles cannot do the same motion due to their energy dumping
character. The difficulty of accelerating charged particles at around
near the speed of light is mainly due to this reason. It is not due to
the Einstein's reason, mass increases its absolute mass depending on
its speed. This is the
critical difference between charged particles and ordinary mass
particles without charge in their moving characters.

However particle physicists have also blind belief that orbital
electron
performs a standing wave motion around its nucleus,

No they don't.


due to the
influence of de Broglei's mass wave effect, and influence of standard
textbook in which electron is treated as mere a mass particle. It says
that the
particle oscillation in a quantum box can build a standing wave. It is
lie! It is a plain truth mas particle without charge cannot perform
such a wavy motion in the space.

So neutrons cannot diffract?


Of course orbital electron cannot
perform such a wavy motion, due to energy dumping behavior.

So electrons cannot diffract either?

I think you'd have loved the 18th century.


Science-dictionary says that the wavy motion is a back and forth or up
and down motion with a definite frequency and amplitude. So a wave
consists of a successive phases with counter characters alternately
changing.


Gobbedly-gook.

How can orbital electron perform such a standing wavy motion
without continuous energy supply?

It's a probability wave, not a physical wave. You really are in the last
century.


Dr. Yoon built an equation of hydrogen spectrum starting from a
differential equation of torsional harmonic oscillation of mass, since
orbital electron ring is elastically connected to its nucleus, and
performs a precessional oscillation around its nucleus. He applies the
classical rule of one string vibration instead of quantizing radiation
energy.

It is, Δν=ν0[1/r^2-1/(r+n)^2], where, Δν: frequency of hydrogen
spectrum, ν0: Rydbery frequency, r: radial parameter of electron ring,

n: precessing parameter of electron ring.

These two parameters, r and n change by integer multiples, due to the
frequency rule of one string vibration. Fixing r=1 we can change n, as
n=1, 2, 3, 4, ..... , because r does not change until its energy
capacity is saturated by its energy uptake. Thus Lyman series is
given, including its series limit showing like a continuous spectrum
which was difficult to explain with Bohr's model. The orbital electron
ring shrinks from r=6 downward, r=5, 4, 3, 2, 1 by folding its
circumference in integer multiple ratio, so these shrunk electron rings
become thicker and stiffer in step wise as initial ring is saturated
with energy uptake. Thus 6 sets of
hydrogen spectrums are made possible.

The radial parameter r can decrese to be under unit as 1/2, 1/3,
1/4,....1/r, in the case when the orbital electron ring has to emit
electromagnetic radiation with lesser
wavelengths than Lyman series. For example in the case of hard x-rays,
parameter r becomes around 1/126, and in the case of gamma-rays with
wavelength, 0,005 angstrom it gives 1/430.

In the harmonic oscillation of mass, allegedly its oscillatory energy
is given by
E=1/2kq^2=m(2π ν q)^2, where k; elasticity constant, q:
amplitude,ν:frequency. m: mass. Obvious fact here is that its
oscillatory energy is
in proportional to its frequency square.

From Dr.Yoon's above equation showing hydrogen spectrum
E=T(Δν)^2=T'(1/r)^4, when n=infinite, is naturally given, where T and
T' : constants involving their average amplitudes. Since h is a
constant, the basic equation in the QM theory, E=hν is fundamentally
out of science.

If we estimate the radial parameter of electron rings emitting x-rays
of around 0.1 angstrom due to bombardment of electron, it gives
r=1/126. It is very close to its nucleus (refer that the average k
shell of
metal atoms is very close to their nuclei since their atomic volume is
far less than hydrogen's). Since the energy of orbital electron ring is

reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its radial parameter, a
very slight increase of its radial parameter gives out a huge energy.
For example, when uranium 235 cleaves into two parts to produce two
lead atoms, all of its electron shells have to expand to be lead's
electron shells. This is the nuclear fission energy of uranium atom.

In the case of unclear fusion,


Freudian slip?

the nuclear electron ring of deuteron
expands to be the double nuclear electron ring of binding 4 protons to
make two neutrons and two protons in the helium nucleus, emitting
energy,
as stated in forging post. This is the nuclear fusion energy.

In short, nuclear fission energy comes from the expansion of atomic
electron rings of uranium atoms,


So you're saying nothing in the nucleus changes?

while the nuclear fission energy comes

from the expansion of nuclear electron rings of deuterons to be a
nuclear double electron ring in helium nucleus to bind 4 protons. The
Einstein's E=mc^2
which is deduced from the false de Broglei's mass wave equation λ=
h/p, and non-scientific equation E=hν, has nothing to do with the
atomic energy. newedana

And neither does this post.

It is quite certain electric and magnetic forces can act through vacant vacuum space without any mass mediation. Thus the light wave generated by orbital electron rings, can propagate through the vacant empty space in radialsymmetric around them, constructing milliards of concentric spherical wavefronts with equi-energy level. In consequence, it has to have a constant speed anywhere in this cosmic space since the vacuum space itself is the medium of light propagation, and the medium has an absolutely isotropic physical character.

1. All the wave fronts produced by oscillation of orbital electron
rings, or the orbital electron building a tiny persistent current ring
around its nucleus, expand their spherical radii infinitely as they
propagate through the vast space of this universe. However, the energy
of each wave front does not change depending on whatever the magnitude
of their spherical radii. All the successive wave fronts have exactly
the same energy as that of orbital electron rings performing a half
cycle of their oscillation, or

E=S1ε1=S2ε2=S3ε3=. . . . .=Sn εn

Where E: energy of an orbital electron ring oscillating a half cycle,
S1,S2,S3.......Sn: surface areas of sequential spherical wave fronts,
and ε1, ε2 ε3 .......εn : energy densities of each wavefronts.
Since Sn/S1=n^2, and n: integer, the intensity of a light beam
decreases by inverse square distance rule. We may find that the energy
dispersion occurs not only along the proceeding direction of light but
also in perpendicular direction to their advancing direction, along
their wave crests and troughs.

This fact tells explicitly that light emission and its propagation is
nothing else than the equilibrating process of electromagnetic energy
of oscillatory electron rings in the light source through the vacant
cosmic space, and not the process of Einstein's space travel of photons
with their momentum given by their source.

2. If we put an optical shield on the pathway of above spherical wave
fronts, a shadowy space is made possible behind it. What happens there?
The light pencils at the edge of the shield bend inward to the shadowy
space, due to the dispersing energy pressure of spherical wave fronts
undestroyed. The higher the frequency and intensity of light the
greater the bending curvature of light, and vise versa. This is the
mechanism of light diffraction that was not yet fully understood up to
the present.

3. A light beam is nothing but a thinly sliced sections of these
spherical wave fronts along their concentrical arrangements in their
propagating direction. Since it is not a flow of corpuscular photons,
the interpretation of double slit experiment by Dr. Yoon's new physics
is consequently quite different from current understanding.

If a plane wave front (wave front of light beam) is slitted by two tiny
apertures, there made two light beams which turn out to develop into
two spherical waves, A and B, due to the energy flow of light along the
wave crest and trough.

When the first wave phase of spherical wave A interferes with the same
first wave phase of spherical wave B it constructs the 0th order of
diffraction light with the most intensive one. If the second wave
phase of wave A interferes with the first wave phase of wave B it
builds the 1st order of diffraction light with a lesser intensity. The
same 1st order of diffraction light is made possible at symmetrical
positions between first wave phase of wave A and second wave phase of
wave B. With the same way, two diffraction lights of 2nd order with
more lesser intensity are made possible between third wave phases of A
light and first wave phase of B light, and between first wave phase of
A light and third wave phase of B light, and so on. This is the correct
understanding of two slit experiment of light. The interpretation with
probability statistics of falling photons on screens is nonsense and a
magic story.

4. In the spherical wave front the light pencil in the center proceeds
along a straight path without bending while other outer light pencils
turn out to bend with their respective curvatures that change depending
on their deviation from the center light pencil, due to the energy flow
along their crests and troughs. The farther the deviation from the
center the greater the curvature of light pencils, and vice versa.
However, all the pathway length of curved light pencils is exactly the
same as that of straight light pencil since the speed of light is
always the same and constant.

Atomic nuclei building material system act to slit wave fronts of
incoming light to build numerous spherical waves. For example, when the
above two spherical waves built by slitting the plane wave front,
interfere constructively within their half wavelengths, or Dλ/2, a
single wave beam of 0th order with different preceeding direction, can
be built if incident angle is not zero. This is the case of light
refraction.

Dr.Yoon's textbook (www.yoonsatom.net) explains how the light
refraction takes place between different materials with different
optical density. He built a simple equation representing the light
refraction without setting up any postulations or premises, which
involving no speed term. It has the form,

n=(φ/sinφ) secηΔθ

where φ=2k/λ, k: spacing parameter between atomic nuclei (mass
density factor), λ: wavelength of incident light, θ: incident angle,
η: a constant.

This equation is simply derived by due analytical process of optical
geometry and rule of trigonometry. The parameter k representing mass
density governs the bending curvatures of light pencil passing through
material system, the greater the value the larger the curvature.
Wavelengthλrules out also the roundly bending curvature of light
pencil through material system, the greater the wavelength the smaller
the bending curvature ( the reason is in his text).

However if the spacing of aperture is over one wavelength there
occurs multiple wave interference between sequential wave phases of
these two spherical waves. So a large number of light beams can be
made. It is the case of light diffraction mentioned above.

5. How can electrons be ejected in the Photoelectric experiments if
light is just wave?
In Dr. Hansik Yoon's New Physics (www.yoonsatom.net), orbital electron
of atom builds a micro persistent current ring around its nucleus. When
this atomic orbital electron ring receives an electromagnetic radiation
whose frequency resonates to its inherent frequency, it takes up wave
energy and oscillates with the same frequency but with a larger
amplitude.

However if it receives an electromagnetic radiation of a higher
frequency but with non-resonant frequency, its ring form turns out to
be broken and liberates the electron with its revolving kinetic energy
that makes the photo-electric current. The shorter the radii of the
electron ring, the higher the energy required to break it and the
higher the kinetic energy of liberated electron.

It is well known that alkali metals are very sensitive in Photoelectric
Effect, because they have the outermost electron rings with the weakest
tenacity against bombardment of radiation energy.

X-rays and gamma rays can also break the outermost electron rings of
atoms to ionize them, since these rays are difficult to be resonate to
the frequency of orbital electron rings of atoms, and have a far
greater energy level. newedana

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
It is quite certain electric and magnetic forces can act through vacant
vacuum space without any mass mediation. Thus the light wave generated by
orbital electron rings, can propagate through the vacant empty space in radial
symmetric around them, constructing milliards of concentric spherical wave
fronts with equi-energy level. In consequence, it has to have a constant speed
anywhere in this cosmic space since the vacuum space itself is the medium of
light propagation, and the medium has an absolutely isotropic physical
character.

1. All the wave fronts produced by oscillation of orbital electron
rings, or the orbital electron building a tiny persistent current ring
around its nucleus, expand their spherical radii infinitely as they
propagate through the vast space of this universe. However, the energy
of each wave front does not change depending on whatever the magnitude
of their spherical radii. All the successive wave fronts have exactly
the same energy as that of orbital electron rings performing a half
cycle of their oscillation, or

E=S1ε1=S2ε2=S3ε3=. . . . .=Sn εn

Where E: energy of an orbital electron ring oscillating a half cycle,
S1,S2,S3.......Sn: surface areas of sequential spherical wave fronts,
and ε1, ε2 ε3 .......εn : energy densities of each wave fronts.
Since Sn/S1=n^2, and n: integer, the intensity of a light beam
decreases by inverse square distance rule. We may find that the energy
dispersion occurs not only along the proceeding direction of light but
also in perpendicular direction to their advancing direction, along
their wave crests and troughs.

This fact tells explicitly that light emission and its propagation is
nothing else than the equilibrating process of electromagnetic energy
of oscillatory electron rings in the light source through the vacant
cosmic space, and not the process of Einstein's space travel of photons
with their momentum given by their source.

2. If we put an optical shield on the pathway of above spherical wave
fronts, a shadowy space is made possible behind it. What happens there?
The light pencils

I do hope they're #2.

at the edge of the shield bend inward to the shadowy
space, due to the dispersing energy pressure of spherical wave fronts
undestroyed. The higher the frequency and intensity of light the
greater the bending curvature of light, and vise versa. This is the
mechanism of light diffraction that was not yet fully understood up to
the present.

And is still not by you.


3. A light beam is nothing but a thinly sliced sections of these
spherical wave fronts along their concentrical arrangements in their
propagating direction. Since it is not a flow of corpuscular photons,
the interpretation of double slit experiment by Dr. Yoon's new physics
is consequently quite different from current understanding.

Sure, just like interpreting chemical bonding as tiny gremlins holding hands
would be quite different from current understanding.


If a plane wave front (wave front of light beam) is slitted by two tiny
apertures, there made two light beams which turn out to develop into
two spherical waves, A and B, due to the energy flow of light along the
wave crest and trough.

When the first wave phase of spherical wave A interferes with the same
first wave phase of spherical wave B it constructs the 0th order of
diffraction light with the most intensive one. If the second wave
phase of wave A interferes with the first wave phase of wave B it
builds the 1st order of diffraction light with a lesser intensity. The
same 1st order of diffraction light is made possible at symmetrical
positions between first wave phase of wave A and second wave phase of
wave B. With the same way, two diffraction lights of 2nd order with
more lesser intensity are made possible between third wave phases of A
light and first wave phase of B light, and between first wave phase of
A light and third wave phase of B light, and so on. This is the correct
understanding of two slit experiment of light. The interpretation with
probability statistics of falling photons on screens is nonsense and a
magic story.

4. In the spherical wave front the light pencil in the center proceeds
along a straight path without bending while other outer light pencils
turn out to bend with their respective curvatures that change depending
on their deviation from the center light pencil, due to the energy flow
along their crests and troughs. The farther the deviation from the
center the greater the curvature of light pencils,

Do they ever need refills?

and vice versa.
However, all the pathway length of curved light pencils is exactly the
same as that of straight light pencil since the speed of light is
always the same and constant.

Atomic nuclei building material system act to slit wave fronts of
incoming light to build numerous spherical waves. For example, when the
above two spherical waves built by slitting the plane wave front,
interfere constructively within their half wavelengths, or Dλ/2, a
single wave beam of 0th order with different preceeding direction, can
be built if incident angle is not zero. This is the case of light
refraction.

Dr.Yoon's textbook (www.yoonsatom.net) explains how the light
refraction takes place between different materials with different
optical density. He built a simple equation representing the light
refraction without setting up any postulations or premises, which
involving no speed term. It has the form,

n=(φ/sinφ) secηΔθ

where φ=2k/λ, k: spacing parameter between atomic nuclei (mass
density factor), λ: wavelength of incident light, θ: incident angle,
η: a constant.

This equation is simply derived by due analytical process of optical
geometry and rule of trigonometry. The parameter k representing mass
density governs the bending curvatures of light pencil passing through
material system, the greater the value the larger the curvature.
Wavelengthλrules out also the roundly bending curvature of light
pencil through material system, the greater the wavelength the smaller
the bending curvature ( the reason is in his text).

However if the spacing of aperture is over one wavelength there
occurs multiple wave interference between sequential wave phases of
these two spherical waves. So a large number of light beams can be
made. It is the case of light diffraction mentioned above.

5. How can electrons be ejected in the Photoelectric experiments if
light is just wave?
In Dr. Hansik Yoon's New Physics (www.yoonsatom.net), orbital electron
of atom builds a micro persistent current ring around its nucleus.

So something would have to be circulating around the nucleus. How come we
detect nothing?

When
this atomic orbital electron ring receives an electromagnetic radiation
whose frequency resonates to its inherent frequency, it takes up wave
energy and oscillates with the same frequency but with a larger
amplitude.


Sounds like you're still using the "miniature solar system" model.

However if it receives an electromagnetic radiation of a higher
frequency but with non-resonant frequency, its ring form turns out to
be broken and liberates the electron with its revolving kinetic energy
that makes the photo-electric current. The shorter the radii of the
electron ring, the higher the energy required to break it and the
higher the kinetic energy of liberated electron.

It is well known that alkali metals are very sensitive in Photoelectric
Effect, because they have the outermost electron rings with the weakest
tenacity against bombardment of radiation energy.

X-rays and gamma rays can also break the outermost electron rings of
atoms to ionize them, since these rays are difficult to be resonate to
the frequency of orbital electron rings of atoms, and have a far
greater energy level. newedana

Mr. Lloyd Parker! You posted

Sounds like you're still using the "miniature solar system" model.

Yes! That is true Dr. Yoon is using the miniature solar system, but he says the motion of orbital electron makes a tiny current ring persisting permanently! I suggest you better read www.yoonsphysics.blogspot.com, and you will find you have been taught with pseudo atomic physics. newedada

1. The explanation of double slit experiment today uses the Bragg's
law, nλ/2=D sin θ. However it does not say why light can diffract as
it passes through a tiny hole. The light with incident angle 0 against
the double slit plane ( in perpendicular to the double slit face) turns
out to make angle θ after it passes through the double slits. Photon
theory neither defines that photons have to repulse each other, nor
admits that plane wave fronts slitted by tiny holes turn out to build
spherical wave fronts. That is, Bragg's law was built in regardless of
diffraction mechanism of light. How primitive is the current
interpretation of double slit experiment and the the Bragg's law!. The
same is the case of uncertainty principle.

2. Since the light refraction takes place when it is slitted with atomic nuclei, the star light bending near the sun is not due to the attraction of massive solar gravitation, but is due to the solar wind containing tremendous atomic nuclei which make it refract with the mechanism mentioned above.

When the light run to the same direction as that of atomic nuclei
building optical apertures that slit the light, there occurs the
red-shift of light, while there takes place the blue-shift when they
run in counter direction. So the red-shift of refracted star light is
not due to losing its energy as it escapes from the solar gravitational
filed, but is due to the reason, nuclear particles in the solar wind
run to the same direction as that of star light travelling for the
earth. Thus, Albert Einstein's explanation for these two phenomena are
all incorrect.

Imagine there is an light travelling in the space. Do you believe that
this light can change its wavelength or frequency due to losing its
energy? No! It loses only its intensity that is nothing to do with
wavelength. This is the natural science! Albert Einstein fooled and
toyed all of us with his general theory of rlativity.

3. How can electrons be ejected in the Photoelectric experiments if
light is just wave? In Dr. Yoon's New Physics (www.yoonsatom.net) or
(Yoonsphysics.blogspot.com), orbital electron of atom builds a micro
persistent current ring around its nucleus. When this atomic orbital
electron ring receives an external electromagnetic radiation whose
frequency resonates to its inherent frequency (orbital electron ring
has a fixed frequency determined by its radius), it takes up the wave
energy and oscillates with the same frequency, while increasing its
amplitude.

However if it receives an electromagnetic radiation of a higher
frequency but with non-resonant frequency, its ring form turns out to
be broken and liberates the electron with its revolving kinetic energy
that makes the photo-electric current. The shorter the radii of the
electron ring, the higher the energy required to break it and the
higher the kinetic energy of liberated electron.

It is well known that alkali metals are very sensitive in Photoelectric
Effect, because these metals have the outermost electron rings with the
weakest tenacity against bombardment of radiation energy. The details
are in Dr. Yoon's text(www.yoonsatom.net)

X-rays and gamma rays can also break the outermost electron rings of
atoms to ionize them, since these rays are difficult to be resonate to
the frequency of orbital electron rings of atoms, and have a far
greater energy level.

Albert Einstein explains this Photoelectric Effect, the incident
photons splash out electrons richly filled in the metal structure. How
childish and primitive is his idea! newedana