![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Alex Terrell wrote: This leaves the problem with the station passing through the inner and outer Van Allen belts on each orbit- unless the intention is to orbit it at such a altitude that its perigee is above them. The CEV would have the same problem. Yes, but. Yes, it would have to pass the Van Allen Belts, but as with Apollo speed, angle, and timing would minimize exposure. This is actually the reason I proposed a cycler in the first place. Once at L1, it could be shielded with lunar water (assuming it exists). Then put into a cycler orbit, enabling comfortable, safe transit. How much water would have to be used? Say, a 10 person crew, 2 week transit time. Assume that no crew member will do more than 1 out-and-back trip (new crew every occupied cycle), so you can use up most of the lifetime exposure limit. /dps |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why not Skylab Redux? | Michael Gallagher | History | 20 | October 3rd 05 05:04 PM |
NASA PDF Mercury, Gemini, Apollo reports free online | Rusty Barton | History | 81 | October 3rd 04 05:33 PM |
NASA Celebrates Skylab Anniversary at Von Braun Forum | Ron Baalke | History | 29 | November 13th 03 04:17 PM |
Florida Today article on Skylab B | Greg Kuperberg | Space Shuttle | 69 | August 13th 03 06:23 PM |
Florida Today article on Skylab B | Greg Kuperberg | Policy | 25 | August 13th 03 02:14 AM |