A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why not Skylab Redux?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 27th 05, 10:24 PM
snidely
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Alex Terrell wrote:

This leaves the problem with the station passing through the inner and
outer Van Allen belts on each orbit- unless the intention is to orbit it
at such a altitude that its perigee is above them.


The CEV would have the same problem.


Yes, but.

Yes, it would have to pass the Van Allen Belts, but as with Apollo
speed, angle, and timing would minimize exposure.


This is actually the reason I proposed a cycler in the first place.
Once at L1, it could be shielded with lunar water (assuming it exists).
Then put into a cycler orbit, enabling comfortable, safe transit.


How much water would have to be used? Say, a 10 person crew, 2 week
transit time. Assume that no crew member will do more than 1
out-and-back trip (new crew every occupied cycle), so you can use up
most of the lifetime exposure limit.

/dps

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why not Skylab Redux? Michael Gallagher History 20 October 3rd 05 05:04 PM
NASA PDF Mercury, Gemini, Apollo reports free online Rusty Barton History 81 October 3rd 04 05:33 PM
NASA Celebrates Skylab Anniversary at Von Braun Forum Ron Baalke History 29 November 13th 03 04:17 PM
Florida Today article on Skylab B Greg Kuperberg Space Shuttle 69 August 13th 03 06:23 PM
Florida Today article on Skylab B Greg Kuperberg Policy 25 August 13th 03 02:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.