![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hmm, it's more likely that the e-mail address isn't right. Take a look at
their website http://www.nastro.org.uk/ advertising 40 members should mean that there will be someone there who can help. Also I'd try e-mailing and see if you get any joy. There's also a couple of phone numbers a.. Adrian Jannetta (Training Officer): 01670 760655 a.. Austin Bowman (Chairman): 0191 271 4238 which you may get more luck with that. Regards Colin Dawson www.cjdawson.com "gavin" wrote in message ... Thanks Colin. I have tried to contact the Astrononmy group in Northumberland twice but they never return emails, not a friendly bunch then, so I may skip joinging them. "Colin Dawson" wrote in message . uk... I say save your money - don't get a scope or bino's just yet. Go down to your local Astronomy Society and they may have some kit that you'll be able to give the once over for yourself. As for what you can see, the best resource that I've found on this is the Book "Turn Left at Orion" This will not only show you alot of things that you can see with a small scope, but also tells you how to find them too. Personally, I think it is important to get the biggest scope that you can with your money. A bigger diameter of the primary optics will improve the light gathering, and what you can actually see. At the same time, there are other things that you need to consider - Mount/Goto/Computer Control/etc The more bells and whistles on the scope the easier is will be to operate and the easier it will be to find the target object (well in theory anyway) You should also consider the portability of your scope. To give you some idea, it's just taken me 20 minutes to put my LX-90 away (it's been beefed up with about 20 cables, computer control guide scope and camera, relay box, slow motion control, SLR camera. The List goes on. The point being, I consider this kit to be on the upper limit of luggable. But other people will consider this way to much stuff and will want a simpler setup, for visual observing this is not a problem. Just the scope would be enough. (see my website for more details) Regards Colin Dawson www.cjdawson.com "gavin" wrote in message ... Looking for advice on which Telescope to buy. I was living in London for 8 years and have now moved upto Northumberland, and as it's actually dark at night, I thought I'd buy myself a Telescope. Astronomy is always something I've had a slight interest in, but have never took up except when I was about 13 and had a little telescope that I could not even use, I look through the view finder at the moon, then through the telescope eyepiece and there would be nothing there. SO I guess you can say I'm a total beginner. I'm wanting something that will do for a beginner and a intermediate level of use. I'm under the impression that Meade are pretty good, am I right in thinking that? I was toying with the idea of the Meade DS-2114AT 114mm Reflector, any good? What will I be able to see with that? I'm looking to spend no more that£800 but would if possible like to keep it around the £600. Again, what will I be able to view with Telescopes in this price range? Any suggestion on telescope makes and using the things are most welcome drop me a line at gavin_hunt_@excitedotcom (replace dot with .) or respond to this email. Thank you Gavin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Large Binocular Telescope to be Dedicated in October 2004 | Ron | Misc | 3 | September 25th 04 06:15 PM |
Infrared Space Telescope Returns First Images, Gets New Name | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 18th 03 07:15 PM |
Sky & Telescope News Bulletin - August 29, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | August 30th 03 01:51 AM |
A tale of a small telescope. | Chuck Simmons | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | August 10th 03 09:51 PM |
World's Largest Astronomical CCD Camera Installed On Palomar Observatory Telescope | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 29th 03 08:54 PM |