![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Silverlight" wrote: In message , Mark J Underwood writes I always thought that objects like the moon were far too bright for hubble ???? It's a myth - be interesting to know how it started. I think it dates back to Hubble's early days, when instruments such as ESA's Faint Object Camera had very strict brightness limits, and would certainly have been destroyed by observing the Moon. Newer fangled solid state imaging sensors such as CCDs have no such safety limits, and in fact Hubble used to "observe" the Sun in order to flood WF/PC-1 with UV to mitigate its QE hysteresis problem. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CEV PDQ | Scott Lowther | History | 829 | June 12th 05 07:17 PM |
CEV PDQ | Scott Lowther | Policy | 577 | May 27th 05 10:11 PM |
Space Access Update #111 04/05/05 | Henry Vanderbilt | Policy | 1 | April 5th 05 08:07 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |