![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cardman wrote in
: Certainly, but I would believe that some Shuttle aspects would be unimportant. Like the Shuttle's ability to bring large items back to the ground. As once it is up there, then there is no point in bringing it back down, when you would only have to pay to launch it again. Incorrect. The ability to bring failed ISS systems back to the ground for forensic analysis is vital to learning how and why they fail, and helps us design better systems. ATV will be restricted by the small hatch sizes on the russian segment. HTV will not be able to return gear to the ground. (neither ATV or Progress). Maybe due to the "crap" from the ISS being considered expendable. No, it's because they were counting on the shuttle to perform that role. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | History | 158 | December 13th 14 09:50 PM |
Stop Space Based Weapons! | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 1 | May 22nd 05 03:35 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
First Moonwalk? A Russian Perspective | Astronaut | Misc | 0 | January 31st 04 03:11 AM |