![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:02:02 -0700, I wrote:
I was surprised to read that the Blue Angels disbanded to go fight in Korea. Makes sense, of course, as they were hand-picked top pilots. But the policy changed with Vietnam- at least I'm pretty certain I saw the Blue Angels perform several times during the war. Was it decided their PR and recruiting role was more valuable than what they could do in actual combat? Since the answer to that question is probably fairly self-evident, and I'm getting into a nasty habit of replying to my own posts lately anyway, I'll reformulate it a bit. Were the 1946 Blue Angels pilots the absolute best in the Navy, and so they were considered indispensable when war broke out in Korea? If so, does that mean that later "wartime" Blue Angels pilot selection is different? I'm trying my best not to suggest that Blue Angels pilots during times of war are in any way less capable than the guys they diverted from airshows to Korea ![]() Dale |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Going from Air Force to NASA blue for astronaut wings (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 6th 04 05:43 PM |
Trust But Verify ... | Christopher M. Jones | History | 119 | July 21st 04 02:02 AM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |