![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr. Hansik Yoon defines that light emission by its source and
propagation through empty space is an equilibrating process of energy produced by oscillatory electrons in its source. So the energy of electromagnetic wave flows not only along the direction the wave proceeds but also the direction in perpendicular to its proceeding direction when its wave front is destroyed by some shields. Thus a wave front sliced by atomic nuclei in material system constructs numerous micro spherical waves. Light pencils packed in spherical waves bend roundly with respective curvatures which increase depending on their deviation form the center light pencil that has a straight pathway, as they propagate through the space. However, all the distance of their curved pathways are exactly the same as that of straight pathway because the speed of light is the same and constant. Human eye cannot sense the curved pathway of the light, but only the straight distance projected on the center light pencil. Denser the nuclei and the shorter the wavelength the greater the curvature of bending light pencil. This is directly connected to the fact that speed of light does not change even in material system, and explains elegantly how light coming out from material system returns to its original pathway, which was impossible to explain with current optical science. Thus Dr. Hansik Yoon asserts that light refraction does not take place due to speed difference of light in different material systems with different density, but because of the reason; the atomic nuclei in mass system subdivides incoming light wave front into numerous micro beams which develope into spherical waves to build a refractive light due their constructive interference at the interface of two material systems. With this simple principle applied to explain light refraction, Dr. Yoon explains also light diffraction, as well as the mechanism of separating white light into its component mono-chromic lights by diffraction gratings, in his book, "Natural Science Founded on A New atomic Model".(www.yoonsatom.net) He also shows a number of schematical demonstration of light refraction, utilizing transparent plastic films upon which a large number of concentric half circles is drawn, representing sequential wave phases. Superimposing them and sliding one of them with the way of his suggestion, it shows the schematic light refraction. And Dr. Yoon concludes that light refraction can take place even in the vacant space if the light wave is sliced by atomic nuclei such as those contained in the solar wind. This fact disproves Einstein's assertion, star light behind the sun bending at near the sun is due to the solar gravitation, and its red shift is due to losing its energy in order to escape from the solar gravitational field. However, these are all fairy stories! The real fact is that the solar wind containing nuclear particles make the star light bend, and its red-shift is due to the reason, the nuclear particles in the solar wind travel for the earth along the same direction as that of star light travels. Solar gravitation attracts the star light passing nearby the sun? Stephan hawking's Black hole absorbs lights passing nearby? Star light turns out to lose energy and being red-shifted due to solar gravitation? false! False! How are so miserable your QM men. You were really hopelessly toyed by Dr. Einstein during the last century! newedana Based on Dr. Hansik Yoon's new physics, "Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model". (www.yoonsatom.net) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() S. Enterprize Company wrote: "The Smart Model" ( An Alternative Atomic Model....) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ What the hell S. Enterprize... your model doesn't even have electrons around the nucleus but inside it. I thought you have given it up. How can you justify an atom without any electrons outside against all experimental evidence?? The likes of you guys (Dr. Yoon, Lockyer, TomGee, etc) are a serious obstacles to the study and search for the physics of qi which is now narrowed down to Shadow Matter E8xE8 Gauge string physics (that is.. qi possibly the field quantum or energy of shadow matter) or Normal Matter 5D-11D Kaluza Klein Kochen Specker Energy or extended aether-matter chaos field dynamics. p6 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S. Enterprize Company wrote:
"The Smart Model" ( An Alternative Atomic Model....) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ What the hell S. Enterprize... your model doesn't even have electrons around the nucleus but inside it. I thought you have given it up. How can you justify an atom without any electrons outside against all experimental evidence?? ------------------------------------------------------------- [Smart1234] Common sense let's us know that a negatively charged electron doesn't exist around a positively charged nucleus. The Smart Model shows us that the electron and the nucleus of an atom interaction by direct field interaction. The electron is like a smaller compressed spiral field that interacts with the positive nucleus. This electron goes inside the nucleus spiral field and reaches a stablized location where it can not move closer or further away from the positive nucleus. The electron then remains stablized until a voltage potential is establized between the atoms which cause the electrons to pass through the core of the positive nucleus. This is how conduction works. The old primitive way of looking at conduction was to believe that there existed a vacant hole in the electron orbital field that allowed electrons to move from hole to hole in each atom. The Smart Model is the most accurate SIMPLE model of the atom known to Mankind. It is is agreement with all levels of analysis from micro level to macro level. In other words, the Smart Model is in agreement and can work at the levels of physics, chemistry, biology, nature, the solar system, galaxy and universal interactions. Each level of analysis produces farily accurate calculations at all levels. The Standard Model works only at the sub-atomic level. The QM model only works logically at the physics level using trickery math analysis like the Periodic Table of Elements Electron Orbital dot notation. The Smart Model Periodic Table of Elements ( still under construction...), shows intelligent structures for each element. Initially The Smart Model suffered alot of rejection due to religious relations I added to it. But I reduced this to a point where Church could be seen separate from State, to abide with the Laws of each state. I agree religion should remain in the area of subjective belief for each person with an option of Freedom Of Religion. This respects the beliefs of others and causes a better relation with people in general. ----------------------------------------------------------- The likes of you guys (Dr. Yoon, Lockyer, TomGee, etc) are a serious obstacles to the study and search for the physics of qi which is now narrowed down to Shadow Matter E8xE8 Gauge string physics (that is.. qi possibly the field quantum or energy of shadow matter) or Normal Matter 5D-11D Kaluza Klein Kochen Specker Energy or extended aether-matter chaos field dynamics. p6 ----------------------------------------------------- [Smart1234] Good grief you have to have a PhD degree to understand the atom with modern day physics. The Smart Model is easy enough for a kid to learn from and understand, but yet be accurate and have the options for higher levels of analysis. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() S. Enterprize Company wrote: S. Enterprize Company wrote: "The Smart Model" ( An Alternative Atomic Model....) http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/ What the hell S. Enterprize... your model doesn't even have electrons around the nucleus but inside it. I thought you have given it up. How can you justify an atom without any electrons outside against all experimental evidence?? ------------------------------------------------------------- [Smart1234] Common sense let's us know that a negatively charged electron doesn't exist around a positively charged nucleus. The Smart Model shows us that the electron and the nucleus of an atom interaction by direct field interaction. The electron is like a smaller compressed spiral field that interacts with the positive nucleus. This electron goes inside the nucleus spiral field and reaches a stablized location where it can not move closer or further away from the positive nucleus. The electron then remains stablized until a voltage potential is establized between the atoms which cause the electrons to pass through the core of the positive nucleus. This is how conduction works. The old primitive way of looking at conduction was to believe that there existed a vacant hole in the electron orbital field that allowed electrons to move from hole to hole in each atom. The electron can't be confined inside the nucleus because of HUP. You made the same mistakes as Porat and Lockyer and just too stubborn to accept that. You just couldn't comprehend that the HUP has solid mathematical and physical basis.. The Smart Model is the most accurate SIMPLE model of the atom known to Mankind. It is is agreement with all levels of analysis from micro level to macro level. In other words, the Smart Model is in agreement and can work at the levels of physics, chemistry, biology, nature, the solar system, galaxy and universal interactions. Each level of analysis produces farily accurate calculations at all levels. Gee. How many times have I heard this. The Lockyer cube vector model is the word's most accurate model. The Yoon Model beats any other models in physics because it is the truth. The Porat Model is the world best and there will be nothing like it. The Thomson Aether Model is the worlds' first and the answer to all our prayers. The Sefton model brings back common sense and the mother of all models. The Seto model clobbers Einstein big time and the world's only true model and deserves the Nobel Prize. The Mccutcheon model finally brings sanity to insanity and explain what is gravity and the theory of everything. The TomGee creation model puts the world in proper order and explain everything. etc. etc. You guys are all out of your mind. The standard model is the one closest to truth and it is supported by overwhelming empirical experimental data. The theory that is going to be the TOE should make them as subsets. Not replace them. You guys will go nowhere. p6 .. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. Physic textbooks today says that the proton nucleus has an orbital elec=
tron which moves up and down by commuting its energy between potential and = kinetic energy in the positive nuclear field, a simulation of the projectil= e mechanics of a thrown stone in the gravitational field of the earth, chan= ging its kinetic energy into potential energy. How primitive is the idea bu= ilding this atomic model! 2. The orbital electron in the old model has to move in a discrete manner from orbits to orbits with different energy level, emitting corpuscular photons. How magical is these ideas! Mass particles cannot move by a discrete manner in the real space of nature. Quantum jump between orbits in the quantum theory is not a discontinuous motion but a fast motion that also has to have a moving path. Discontinuous motion of a mass means that a particle disappears suddenly at a place and then reappears at some other place. This can exist only in a fairy or a magical land. 3=2EDropping motion or a circular motion of orbital electron in the nuclear positive field is not an oscillatory motion, so that such motion cannot generate electromagnetic waves or light constructed with electromagnetic wave phases of counter characters sequentially linked. 4=2E The orbital electron in particle physics expressing as probability-electron is not detectable with the same probability in the electron shell. Because a mass particle cannot move in three dimensional x, y, z space by balancing its kinetic energy with its unclear potential energy. Note that kinetic energy of Bohr's orbital electron moving in two dimensional space, can delicately balance with its nuclear potential energy. 5=2E It is a false story the orbital electron doesn't fall into the nucleus due to the effect of uncertainty principle. As the electron gets nearer the nucleus, it's kinetic energy increases. So the increased kinetic energy turns out to exceed the potential energy as it approaches the nucleus. However the speed increment of electron has no reason to increase its mass, according to Dr. Yoon's new physics. It is the time to abandon all the natural science today built upon these non-scientific false premises. Dr. Yoon's atomic model has a proton nucleus carrying an orbital electron rotating at the fastest speed around it. It builds a tiny persistent current that induces an intensive Meissoner's magnetism, since the atomic space is an ideally perfect vacuum so the space becomes a room temperature superconductor for moving electrons. What really goes on in a superconductor in contrast to standard model mechanism, is that the persistent current is automatically induced in the superconductor that is exposed in an external magnetic field. So the super conductor turns out to float upon external magnetic pole, due to repulsion between them. Similarly. The orbital electron orbiting around its nucleus is a kind of persistent current though tiny. That is why orbital electron does not fall to its nucleus and can perform its orbiting motion permanently, because the nucleus acts like the "external magnetic field" which the superconducting electron opposes just like in standard superconducting behavior. The Meissoner's diamagnetic effect against external magnetism, is due to the reason that the persistent current ring turns out to change its face immediately in reverse to produce the diamagnetism, because the current ring hates external magnetism being penetrated through it. How can the orbital electron can rotate permanently without energy supply? How can the orbital electron keeps its position without merging into its nucleus if its kinetic energy balances delicately with its potential energy when applied an external pressure on it? These two questions were remained as mystery in the history of atomic physics. However, Dr. Yoon's atomic model simply solved these two critical questions. The electron building a tiny persistent current ring is no more a mass particle, but a continuous entity with a perfect elasticity. It is connected to its nucleus with electromagnetic force fluxes, and performs a torsional harmonic oscillation to emit or absorb external electromagnetic radiations. The nuclear attraction balances with the Meissoner's diamagnetic repulsion induced by the orbital electron ring. The orbital electron ring can approach limitlessly to its nucleus to form a neutron. The nearer the distance between its nucleus, the greater the frequency of electromagnetic waves it emits, and vise versa. Thus the energy order of universal atomic model is quite in reverse to that of current model. Based on his new atomic model, Dr. Yoon deals with numerous scientific subjects without relying on any established principles or theories such as the relativity theory and quantum mechanics which were built based on false premises. Thus many controversial subjects of modern natural science ranging from micro-organism to cosmology were explained seamlessly from the new atomic model's viewpoint. New natural science founded on Yoon's universal atomic Model titled "Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model" may be revolutionary, denying all the established principles during the last 20th century. The book has its own web site (http://www.yoonsatom.net). For example, he discovered new relations between electricity and magnetism, and the character of Meissoner's magnetism induced by orbital electron rings which is somewhat different from ordinary magnetism of solenoid-current system. He discusses flaws of the dualism of wave-particle, the flows of current chemical bounds, flaws of de Broglei's mass wave theory, as well as Heigenberg's uncertainty principle. He discloses that the equation, E=3Dh=CE=BDin the quantum theory, and the equation E=3Dm in the relativity theory are scientifically meaningless. The hydrogen spectrum that was thought impossible to explain it without quantizing radiation energy, was explained more elegantly than existing one, by building a mathematical model based on a pure innate human intelligence. With the same equation applied for the hydrogen spectrum, he could explain the mechanism of generating x-rays, and =CE=B3-rays, as well as atomic nuclear fission and fusion energy. Based on the same principle, he could define the nuclear strong force, so mysteriously remained up to the present, the essentiality of =CE=B1, =CE=B2, and=CE=B3 rays, and the mechanism of how element atoms incl= uding radioactive atoms being built in the sun or other stars. If you read his text book you will find automatically that the cosmic gases such as hydrogen, deuterium and helium are surprisingly not the fuel source of nuclear fusion in the sun, but are mere ashes exhausted to emit their structural energy. He explains the real mechanism of superconductor, real nature of light, real mechanism of diffraction and refraction of light, speed of light, mechanism of NMR and IR spectrum, and laser light, with entirely different principles from existing knowledge. He discovered the full electron numbers in each electron shell of atomic structure, by peer reviewing the periodicity of element atoms. It is, 2, 8, 8, 2, 8, 8 (18), 2, 8, 8 (18), 8, 8, 8, 8 (32), 8, 8, 8, 8 (32), 2, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8, 8 (50). it is constituted with number 2 and 8. This basic periodicity tells us surprisingly a lot of unknown information in the atomic physics, such as atomic valency under 7, electro-negativity of element atoms, physical properties of element atoms, such as the structure of metals, melting and freezing points of materials, and more. He explains the physical property of water molecules, and new chemistry of carbohydrate synthesis, such as the mechanism of photosynthesis of carbohydrates, as well as burning mechanism of carbohydrates in the living organism. He clears the structure of bio-water in living organisms and bio-polymers building gel crystals, and the denatruration of bio-proteins, killing action of living organic tissues. He also deals with the mechanism of forming crystals, organic carbon compounds, and synthetic polymeric materials, fibers, and elastomers with an entirely different science. Dr. Yoon shows clearly the light is not a flow of corpuscular photons, but is a continuous wavy entity of electromagnetism. The light emission by its source and its propagation through the empty space are the process of equilibrating the energy of orbital electron rings, so the source does not provide momentum to its lights or photons. He defines that the empty space itself is the very transmitting medium of electromagnetic radiation. So there cannot exist a moving coordinate frame in this universe as far as concerned to transmission of light. He also states in his book that the refraction of light is not due to the speed difference of lights propagating in different material systems with different densities, quite contrary to what we have learned. Light diffraction and refraction take place when continuous wave fronts are slitted into micro beams which develop into tiny spherical waves. Thus there occurs constructive wave phase interference between them to build refractive or diffractive lights. The spherical waves that are ignored in particle physics were reinvented scientifically. The energy of electromagnetic wave disperses not only along the direction the wave propagates but also to the direction in perpendicular to its proceeding pathway when the plane wave fronts being slitted. newedana |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new paradigm for physics update | Gary Forbat | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | June 21st 04 06:26 AM |
new paradigm for physics update | Gary Forbat | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 20th 04 06:47 AM |
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics | Stephen Mooney | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | May 31st 04 04:30 AM |
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics | Stephen Mooney | SETI | 0 | May 30th 04 08:53 PM |
when will our planet stop rotating? | meat n potatoes | Amateur Astronomy | 61 | March 27th 04 12:50 PM |