![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Joseph Lazio wrote: The problem here is that many people (based in part on poor descriptions from my learned colleagues) think that the initial singularity in the Big Bang model was a point in space. It wasn't. It was a point in time. If you extrapolate backward in time, we reach a point at which our understanding breaks down, because the temperature and density of the Universe become infinite. Would it help if you could extrapolate backward in time and, subject to the hypothesis summarized in my other post in this thread, forward in time in some other spacetime framework and pursue a "meet in the middle" strategy? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What are Quasars made of? | Paul Hollister | Astronomy Misc | 17 | March 9th 05 04:42 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 9th 04 06:30 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 8 | September 7th 04 12:07 AM |
Big Bang Baloney....or scientific cult? | Yoda | Misc | 102 | August 2nd 04 02:33 AM |
A dialogue between Mr. Big BANG and Mr. Steady STATE | Marcel Luttgens | Astronomy Misc | 12 | August 6th 03 06:15 AM |