A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

EOR with Stick



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 14th 05, 04:56 AM
Rand Simberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 13 Jul 2005 14:18:17 -0700, in a place far, far away, "Ed Kyle"
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:

Tom Cuddihy wrote:
As for crew and cargo, the crew will already
have just completed a ride atop tens of tons
of such propellant - and will be docking to more
tens of tons of it, so a few more tons shouldn't
matter as long as good safeties and escape
options are available.

- Ed Kyle


yes, except for it goes directly against what Griffen has testified
multiple times to Congress, that crew should be separated from cargo.


After Challenger, satellite payloads were gradually
transitioned off shuttle to be launched by expendable
boosters. The thinking was that, since shuttle had
turned out to be more hazardous than originally
believed, anything that could be launch without
a crew, should. The effect was to vastly cut the
total number of shuttle missions. Consider that
before Challenger one of the biggest shuttle jobs was
going to be launch of the GPS satellite constellation!

But of course, crew and "cargo" (stuff in the
shuttle payload pay) have flown together on every
single space shuttle flight since Challenger, and
this will happen during the CEV era to some extent.


Yes, this whole notion about it somehow being unsafe to mix crew and
cargo is really quite brainless.
  #2  
Old July 14th 05, 04:22 AM
Tom Cuddihy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Rand Simberg wrote:
On 13 Jul 2005 14:18:17 -0700, in a place far, far away, "Ed Kyle"
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:

Tom Cuddihy wrote:
As for crew and cargo, the crew will already
have just completed a ride atop tens of tons
of such propellant - and will be docking to more
tens of tons of it, so a few more tons shouldn't
matter as long as good safeties and escape
options are available.

- Ed Kyle

yes, except for it goes directly against what Griffen has testified
multiple times to Congress, that crew should be separated from cargo.


After Challenger, satellite payloads were gradually
transitioned off shuttle to be launched by expendable
boosters. The thinking was that, since shuttle had
turned out to be more hazardous than originally
believed, anything that could be launch without
a crew, should. The effect was to vastly cut the
total number of shuttle missions. Consider that
before Challenger one of the biggest shuttle jobs was
going to be launch of the GPS satellite constellation!

But of course, crew and "cargo" (stuff in the
shuttle payload pay) have flown together on every
single space shuttle flight since Challenger, and
this will happen during the CEV era to some extent.


Yes, this whole notion about it somehow being unsafe to mix crew and
cargo is really quite brainless.


when did common sense enter our space policy?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
White Elephant (was Naming 'the stick') Michael Kent Policy 24 July 27th 05 05:51 PM
Naming 'the stick' Michael Kent Policy 2 July 10th 05 10:39 PM
Inline SDV heavy lifter and The Stick Herb Schaltegger Space Shuttle 5 July 5th 05 06:07 PM
Mars - Gemmule on a Stick Thomas Lee Elifritz Policy 151 March 15th 04 03:55 PM
Mirror mirror on a stick Peter Grimwood UK Astronomy 3 March 12th 04 06:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.