Terrorism vs. the "Comfortably Numb"

Changing the World through car-bombs or Live8?


Terrorism is an attempt to maximize the effect of a small disturbance
through uncertainty. By the grace of God we reply. So each attack
is felt by all and at once. The fear of randomness creates
the kind of massive parallel connectivity we see growing on the internet.
This allows a small disturbance to cascade, to have a large
non-linear effect throughout.

Optimizing uncertainty is the weapon of our enemies.

But this most complex realm is where nature and evolution
resides. Randomness and uncertainty are the primary
forces for self organization and life. Which is why
objective science cannot see the true beauty of nature
or the simplicity of creation. Modern Science can't fathom
reality since it seeks out and specializes in certainty.
The opposite of Nature.

Our enemies are attempting to evoke the Power of Nature to defeat us.

But these fundamentalists have ironically made the most basic mistake
of all. They are attacking democracies which closely mimic nature, and
have all the same resilience and adaptability of a highly evolved system.
Their attacks are quickly absorbed and we even thrive off them.

But if the tables are turned and we apply the power of nature
against them, would that succeed?

The rigid dictatorial structures preferred by our enemies resist
such small non-linear attacks easily. They are designed specifically
to survive individual disturbances especially from within.
But rigid structures are also very brittle, they will resist only up
to a point, then shatter completely. We've all seen this with our
own eyes.

So a small non-linear attack would have to be applied to our
enemies at a critical point where the massive parallel connectivity
can be restored. So the disturbance would be felt by all at once.

If such a critical point could be found, a dictatorship of any kind
would be helpless to survive.

We've witnessed such non-linear attacks. The Janet and Justin scandal
at the Super Bowl is a textbook example of this kind of activism.
A highly censored and rigid 'network' at it's most critical point
attacked by a symbolic act. The entire system trembled at once
creating maximum uncertainty. Creating a life of it's own.
It self-organized and evolved.

The Kathy-Lee sweatshop scandal was another.
In both, the rigid context was ideal, both found the system
critical points, and both used the perfect symbolism.

The symbolism used must also follow the teachings of nature, to
optimize uncertainty. Was the act by Janet and Justin vulgar
and opportunistic, or was it an expression of freedom and beauty?
Was it good or evil? Was Kathy-Lee a person that loves children
or exploits them? Which is it? As with Dante's Inferno the symbolic
scaffold must be stretched to the opposite extremes of heaven and hell
to allow the greatest emotional impact.

The impact forces the system to evolve.

And once initiated the system is pushed into the hands of
Mother Nature. Although we cannot know the direct effects
we can have complete faith in the ultimate outcome.
The system evolves.

I submit, and intend to demonstrate, that we now have the mathematics
of nature needed to harness Her forces. And that we now
have the tools of connectivity, literally at our fingertips, that allow us
to apply the Power of Nature ...at will.

As if we were Gods.


An experiment to test these concepts would seem to be in order.
Our large world is still, unfortunately, a target-rich environment.
So to give this experiment the best chance of success I should choose
the easiest and most vulnerable system I can find. One that is primed
and ready for this non-linear war of words, music and poets.

Looking around I believe I've found one that appears custom
made. A system that is exceptionally rigid and brittle, and also
is exposed to a very sensitive critical point in the near future.

My little experiment will be designed to produce results
in and around the 2008 Beijing Olympics. The most rigid
system the world has to offer. The largest system the world
has to offer. The most sensitive system the world has
to offer, as this Champagne Event is meant to legitimize the PRC
and secure their future.

A rigid system ...all eyes..will be connected to at once.

This world is planning a Grand Gala to consummate the indefinite
enslavement of /one fourth/ of the human race. These Olympics
will be Celebrating the Rape of the natural world.
Even the timeless patience of Mother Nature will be tested
beyond Her limits in such a dark arena.

She will intervene.

Merely placing some appropriate imagery of their own destruction
in the minds of these twelve people should suffice.
http://www.cecc.gov/pages/virtualAca...ateleaders.php

Their own paranoia and fear of uncertainty will do the rest.

I wish to see the triumph of democracy.
So the world can be returned to Nature.


Jonathan



singin'


"There is no pain, you are receding.
A distant ship's smoke on the horizon.
You are only coming through in waves.
Your lips move but I can't hear what you're sayin'.

When I was a child
I caught a fleeting glimpse,
Out of the corner of my eye.
I turned to look but it was gone.
I cannot put my finger on it now.
The child is grown, the dream is gone.

I, have become comfortably numb."



By David Gilmour and Roger Waters
http://music.channel.aol.com/live_8_...ly_toronto.adp



s

"Jo Schaper" wrote in message
...
jonathan wrote:

My little experiment will be designed to produce results
in and around the 2008 Beijing Olympics. The most rigid
system the world has to offer. The largest system the world
has to offer. The most sensitive system the world has
to offer, as this Champagne Event is meant to legitimize the PRC
and secure their future.

Nah. The Olympic structure has nothing on the Catholic Church.


I was talking about Red China, but oh well.

This same kind of non-linear internet war of words and imagery has
already had one great success story. One I watched in awe
cascade out of control until it reached it's magnificent goal.

Which was to cause such an uproar and fear of the internet that
governments would overreact and install draconian internet
censorship laws forcing the issue to court. As a result the
Communications Decency Act of 96 (CDA) was passed by the
US Congress that banned /all/ adult speech on the internet with
severe penalties.

In Reno vs the Aclu the Supreme Court overturned the act, and
while doing so gave the internet the highest level of First Amendment
protection. And 9 to 0, carved now in granite.

ONE NEWSGROUP DID THAT

This decision essentially spread American First Amendment rights
to the entire world. Even the spreading of British rights to the
New World pales in comparison to this expansion of liberty.
The effects of this decision will ring throughout the future
of this planet.

I've spend several years trying to grasp the concepts that
explain what I witnessed. Which was to watch a dozen or
two complete strangers help transform this world with a few
choice words and images. This ng focused the hate of the entire
world upon itself, then dared all comers to silence it.
From the NSA to Mi-5 and a dozen more tried to silence
this ng and failed. And it was all an elaborate ng troll that
broke no laws.

They couldn't silence it so they decided the only way
left is to silence the /entire/ internet just to get
at this one 'pig'.



"Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court."

"In Sable, 492 U. S., at 127, we remarked that the speech restriction at
issue there amounted to "`burn[ing] the house to roast the pig.'" The CDA,
casting a far darker shadow over free speech, threatens to torch a large
segment of the Internet community."

"Judge Dalzell's review of "the special attributes of Internet
communication" disclosed by the evidence convinced him that
the First Amendment denies Congress the power to regulate
the content of protected speech on the Internet. Id., at 867.
His opinion explained at length why he believed the
Act would abridge significant protected speech, particularly by
noncommercial speakers, and concluded that the Internet-as
"the most participatory form of mass speech yet developed," id.,
at 883-is entitled to "the highest protection from governmental intrusion,"
ibid.(30)"

"We agree with its conclusion that our cases provide no basis for
qualifying the level of First Amendment scrutiny that should
be applied to this medium."




I know for a fact a few people can change the world.
This ng could bring democracy to ONE FOURTH of
the world ...if... it chose to do so. Allowing democracy
to clear its last great hurdle, allowing justice and prosperity
to spread to the ends of the earth.

This turning point in human history is staring us in the face.
It's there for the taking. Politicizing the Beijing Olympics
and turning it into a referendum on democracy is my goal.
The PRC could not survive it.




Jonathan



The Bone that has no marrow;
What ultimate for that?
It is not fit for table,
For beggar, or for cat.

A bone has obligations,
A being has the same;
A marrowless assembly
Is culpabler than shame.

But how shall finished creatures
A function fresh obtain?
Old Nicodemus' phantom
Confronting us again!


By E Dickinson



s










s