![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kaido Kert" wrote in message
... http://www.thespacereview.com/article/59/1 Jeff Foust writes a good review on the recent buzz over the new vision for the possible new space policy directions. The space shuttle was born from a vision -- cheaper space flight. It didn't pan out. We kept the shuttle, but abandoned the vision. NASA made a couple of attempts at cheaper space flight, such as X-33, but they didn't follow through. We need a vision, but we also need competent execution. I'm not one of the Mars advocates. It costs too much, the benefits are too low, and it is too easy to turn it into a dead-end program. That's one reason why Bush Sr's vision died. I agree that the President is in the best position to sell a vision to the American public. It is getting late in Bush's administration and if he doesn't get re-elected, his vision won't matter. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |