A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old June 2nd 05, 12:19 PM
Lloyd Parker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
What is the chemical bond? How can bond reliase energy when decomposes
and rebuilds another bonds?



E = mc^2

?Do you now the mechanism of emitting
energy?


Yes. You don't. Go learn it.

I forggot QM men do not know any mechanisms but do only
calculation and arbitrary stupid interpretations! newedana


Pot, kettle.
  #122  
Old June 2nd 05, 12:21 PM
Lloyd Parker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
geez, you are so boring and incompetent. go and bury your useless head

in sand. bryant

You should abandon the useless fraudulent QM theory and start to learn

really true science such as Yoon's natural science. that is good for you!

Atoms combine themselves with their outermost electron rings to build a

molecule. The force building a molecule is not the coulomb's attraction
acting between atoms, but is the Meissoner's magnetic attraction
self-induced by the outermost orbital electron rings of component atoms.

There are no rings. Learn QM.

The outermost electron rings of two atoms with a single electron in
their electron rings are connected by self-induced magnetic force
fluxes to build a combined electron ring with pair electrons, which is
defined as molecular electron ring.


No it isn't.

These molecular orbital electron rings can also induce Meissoner's
magnetic force fluxes building closed circuits through a large number
of the same molecular electron rings, in terms of having the same
radius or resonant frequencies. Molecules thus connected by their
molecular orbital electron rings with these Meissoner's magnetic force
fluxes can build a liquid state of phase. However, if they have
entirely different orbital radius or different oscillatory frequency,
they can never build a liquid state of phase, because magnetic fluxes
induced by them are unable to build unified closed circuits possible to
connect individual molecules.
For example, if we admix hydrocarbons and water allegedly they never build

a uniform single phase, but being separated immediately into two phase.
Because molecular electron rings of water molecules can induce their
magnetic force fluxes that can build unified closed circuits to attract
themselves, while molecular electron rings of hydrocarbon can induce their
magnetic force fluxes constructing unified closed circuits to attract
themselves, however the magnetic force fluxes induced by molecular electron
rings of water molecules and those induced by molecular electron rings of
hydrocarbon never combine to build unified closed circuits, since their
molecular electron rings have entirely different oscillatory frequencies. (
It is not due to hydrogen bondings between water molecules as believed
today)
When temperature is raised, the binding force of magnetic force fluxes
induced by molecular orbital electron rings, turns out to be weakened.
The precessional oscillation of molecular orbital electron rings
results to make their magnetic force fluxes have a lesser density by
spreading them broadly. If the magnetic attraction between molecular
orbital electron rings exceeds the momentum of molecular heat motion, a
collection of these molecules can construct a liquid phase, while the
latter force exceeds the former force they remain as a gas state of
phase.

When temperature decreases further, atomic cores or component atomic
cores of molecules also serve to connect these atoms or molecules. Thus
the liquid state of materials turns into solid or crystal phases(
mechanism of forming crystal is elegantly explained in detail in
Dr.Yoon's textbook). If inner electron rings of atoms or component
atoms of molecules( one or 4 electron rings in any of electron shells.
If inner electron rings combine chemically with neighbor's inner
electron rings it makes ceramics) are connected due to their
self-induced magnetic force fluxes, these atoms or molecules build a
solid state of phase.

In order for atomic cores to be bound with one another to build a solid
state of materials, electron rings in them must have the same radial
parameter, and have to have a gross magnetic polarity.
When atoms or molecules construct a liquid phase, allegedly they
decrease drastically their phase volume. Atoms or molecules have to be
brought to the closest distance in order for them to be connected by
their outermost electron rings, or by their molecular orbital electron
rings with their self-induced magnetic fluxes. In contrast to this
case, a little volume change is quite natural when a liquid phase turns
into a solid phase, because the change of inter-distance between the
component atomic cores of molecules is so small. That is why the
liquid is incompressible.

Since it requires an energy uptake to destruct the established closed
circuits of Meissoner's magnetic force fluxes, the energy required to
destruct and open these closed circuits of magnetic force fluxes
connecting a large number of atoms or molecules, is nothing but the
potential heat of evaporating or sublimating atoms or molecules from
their liquid or solid aggregation. The potential energy required to
break and open the established closed circuits of magnetic force fluxes
combining atomic cores, is nothing but the melting potential of
materials.

Gas atoms or molecules turn out as liquid states in general when
temperature drops down merely, but some kinds of gases are hard to be
liquidized by simply lowering the temperature. In order for this kind
of gases to liquidize, their phases have to be compressed. The border
line temperature and pressure to be lowered and added to liquidize gas
materials, are thus defined as critical temperature and pressure. Then
what does mean the critical temperature and pressure, in the level of
orbital electron rings? The scientific meaning of these critical
temperature and critical pressure was inexplicable based on the
particle physics.

As the temperature increases, the precessing amplitude of the outermost
orbital electron rings of atoms or molecules increases, which results
to decrease the binding force of Meissoner's magnetic fluxes to connect
other atoms or molecules. Because the magnetic force fluxes induced by
these electron rings performing precessional oscillation turn out to
spread to have thinner density. In order for atomic or molecular
orbital electron rings to be able to connect themselves readily with
their self-produced magnetic fluxes for formation of a liquid phase,
their precessing amplitude have to be suppressed to be the minimum by
lowering temperature, and also the distance between them have to be
reduced to be the minimum, by compressing their phase to intensify the
magnetic force fluxes binding atoms or molecules. The former
temperature signifies the critical temperature, and the latter pressure
is the critical pressure. Newedana


Geez, doofus, why not just say "it's magic." Would be more scientific than
your goobledy-gook.

Did you write for Star Trek: Voyager?
  #123  
Old June 2nd 05, 01:07 PM
newedana
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

geez, you are so boring and incompetent. go and bury your useless head
in sand. bryant

You should abandon the useless fraudulent QM theory and start to learn really true science such as Yoon's natural science. that is good for you!


Atoms combine themselves with their outermost electron rings to build a molecule. The force building a molecule is not the coulomb's attraction acting between atoms, but is the Meissoner's magnetic attraction self-induced by the outermost orbital electron rings of component atoms.

The outermost electron rings of two atoms with a single electron in
their electron rings are connected by self-induced magnetic force
fluxes to build a combined electron ring with pair electrons, which is
defined as molecular electron ring.
These molecular orbital electron rings can also induce Meissoner's
magnetic force fluxes building closed circuits through a large number
of the same molecular electron rings, in terms of having the same
radius or resonant frequencies. Molecules thus connected by their
molecular orbital electron rings with these Meissoner's magnetic force
fluxes can build a liquid state of phase. However, if they have
entirely different orbital radius or different oscillatory frequency,
they can never build a liquid state of phase, because magnetic fluxes
induced by them are unable to build unified closed circuits possible to
connect individual molecules.
For example, if we admix hydrocarbons and water allegedly they never build a uniform single phase, but being separated immediately into two phase. Because molecular electron rings of water molecules can induce their magnetic force fluxes that can build unified closed circuits to attract themselves, while molecular electron rings of hydrocarbon can induce their magnetic force fluxes constructing unified closed circuits to attract themselves, however the magnetic force fluxes induced by molecular electron rings of water molecules and those induced by molecular electron rings of hydrocarbon never combine to build unified closed circuits, since their molecular electron rings have entirely different oscillatory frequencies. ( It is not due to hydrogen bondings between water molecules as believed today)

When temperature is raised, the binding force of magnetic force fluxes
induced by molecular orbital electron rings, turns out to be weakened.
The precessional oscillation of molecular orbital electron rings
results to make their magnetic force fluxes have a lesser density by
spreading them broadly. If the magnetic attraction between molecular
orbital electron rings exceeds the momentum of molecular heat motion, a
collection of these molecules can construct a liquid phase, while the
latter force exceeds the former force they remain as a gas state of
phase.

When temperature decreases further, atomic cores or component atomic
cores of molecules also serve to connect these atoms or molecules. Thus
the liquid state of materials turns into solid or crystal phases(
mechanism of forming crystal is elegantly explained in detail in
Dr.Yoon's textbook). If inner electron rings of atoms or component
atoms of molecules( one or 4 electron rings in any of electron shells.
If inner electron rings combine chemically with neighbor's inner
electron rings it makes ceramics) are connected due to their
self-induced magnetic force fluxes, these atoms or molecules build a
solid state of phase.

In order for atomic cores to be bound with one another to build a solid
state of materials, electron rings in them must have the same radial
parameter, and have to have a gross magnetic polarity.
When atoms or molecules construct a liquid phase, allegedly they
decrease drastically their phase volume. Atoms or molecules have to be
brought to the closest distance in order for them to be connected by
their outermost electron rings, or by their molecular orbital electron
rings with their self-induced magnetic fluxes. In contrast to this
case, a little volume change is quite natural when a liquid phase turns
into a solid phase, because the change of inter-distance between the
component atomic cores of molecules is so small. That is why the
liquid is incompressible.

Since it requires an energy uptake to destruct the established closed
circuits of Meissoner's magnetic force fluxes, the energy required to
destruct and open these closed circuits of magnetic force fluxes
connecting a large number of atoms or molecules, is nothing but the
potential heat of evaporating or sublimating atoms or molecules from
their liquid or solid aggregation. The potential energy required to
break and open the established closed circuits of magnetic force fluxes
combining atomic cores, is nothing but the melting potential of
materials.

Gas atoms or molecules turn out as liquid states in general when
temperature drops down merely, but some kinds of gases are hard to be
liquidized by simply lowering the temperature. In order for this kind
of gases to liquidize, their phases have to be compressed. The border
line temperature and pressure to be lowered and added to liquidize gas
materials, are thus defined as critical temperature and pressure. Then
what does mean the critical temperature and pressure, in the level of
orbital electron rings? The scientific meaning of these critical
temperature and critical pressure was inexplicable based on the
particle physics.

As the temperature increases, the precessing amplitude of the outermost
orbital electron rings of atoms or molecules increases, which results
to decrease the binding force of Meissoner's magnetic fluxes to connect
other atoms or molecules. Because the magnetic force fluxes induced by
these electron rings performing precessional oscillation turn out to
spread to have thinner density. In order for atomic or molecular
orbital electron rings to be able to connect themselves readily with
their self-produced magnetic fluxes for formation of a liquid phase,
their precessing amplitude have to be suppressed to be the minimum by
lowering temperature, and also the distance between them have to be
reduced to be the minimum, by compressing their phase to intensify the
magnetic force fluxes binding atoms or molecules. The former
temperature signifies the critical temperature, and the latter pressure
is the critical pressure. Newedana

  #124  
Old June 2nd 05, 01:23 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


newedana the sci.physics village idiot wrote:

You should abandon the useless fraudulent QM theory and start to learn really true science such as Yoon's natural science. that is good for you!



can't take advice from a village idiot. sorry, don't want to turn
into a knucklehead.

[snip rest of village idiot's rubbish]

  #125  
Old June 2nd 05, 04:27 PM
Bjoern Feuerbacher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

newedana wrote:
geez, you are so boring and incompetent. go and bury your useless head
in sand. bryant



You should abandon the useless fraudulent QM theory


It isn't useless. It is used thousands of times every year to make
predictions (which agree with experiments) and even to construct
technology. Wake up. Face reality.

Oh, BTW: you still have not presented the tiniest shred of evidence
that it is fraudulent.


and start to learn really true science such as Yoon's natural science.


Yoon has no clue of science. And you have even less.


[snip long rant of unsupported assertions]


Bye,
Bjoern
  #126  
Old June 6th 05, 02:24 AM
newedana
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There are no rings. Learn QM.

If we operate oscillatory magnetism from outside of superconductor having a ring form, there flows an electric current persisting permanently even though we remove this oscillatory external magnetism. It is called a persistent current built with moving electrons. In this case the orbiting electron is no more a mass particle with negative charge but is a current ring exerting only intensive magnetism without exerting coulomb's force. This is an experimental truth, and not an assumption. Dr. Yoon says that orbital electron is a tiny persistent current ring like that flowing through a superconductor. it appears you village idiot never heard what is a superconductor and what is a persistent current with a ring shape. newedana


  #127  
Old June 6th 05, 02:52 AM
p6
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Listen up Newedana.

The primary root claim of Dr. Yoon is that in electrons that are
moving, the electric field lags behind so there is no electric
field at the front.

Look. There are countless experiments in particle physics where they
study the behavior of the particles when they are near and in
collisions, etc. If what Dr. Yoon claim that moving electrons don't
have electric field at the front. There would be anomaly in the
experimental results and scientists can easily discover it. The fact
that thousands of experiments are done with budget of billions of
dollars and no such finding occurs means electric field is
omnidirectional
even in moving electrons.

This is the primary problem I have with Yoon Book. If
have thoughts about the particle experiments worldwide and why they
are all wrong. Feel free to share it and we will give our
counterarguments. I don't give in to any biases based on
subjective feeling and conceptual favoritism but to pure empirical
data.

You must focus on this electic field lagging behind a moving electron
thing. If it is falsified, all of Yoon stuff is falsified. If it
stands,
there is a big possibility Dr. Yoon may be on to something in his
alleged
atomic model.
p6

newedana wrote:
There are no rings. Learn QM.


If we operate oscillatory magnetism from outside of superconductor having a ring form, there flows an electric current persisting permanently even though we remove this oscillatory external magnetism. It is called a persistent current built with moving electrons. In this case the orbiting electron is no more a mass particle with negative charge but is a current ring exerting only intensive magnetism without exerting coulomb's force. This is an experimental truth, and not an assumption. Dr. Yoon says that orbital electron is a tiny persistent current ring like that flowing through a superconductor. it appears you village idiot never heard what is a superconductor and what is a persistent current with a ring shape. newedana


  #128  
Old June 6th 05, 04:33 AM
newedana
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

p6 wrote

Listen p6. Electromagnetic waves are built with successive linkage of electric and magnetic wave phases between which made are right angles, right? What do you imagine that these invisible wave phases are built from? According to primary science textbook, they are built with electric and magnetic fluxes making right angles. Then where do these electric and magnetic fluxes originate? They are obviously from orbital electrons of atoms constructing their source. So it is the evidence there exists a time lag between the moving speed of orbital electron and its electromagnetic fluxes building electromagnetic waves. It signifies in turn that electromagnetic fluxes can shift behind the moving orbital electron. newedana


  #129  
Old June 6th 05, 05:00 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the incompetent, amateur village idiot newedana wrote:

Listen p6. Electromagnetic waves are built with successive linkage of electric and magnetic wave phases between which made are right angles, right?


you can't even differentiate between flux and field. how can
"electric and magnetic wave phases" make a right angle when a flux is a
scalar quantity?
give me a definition of flux, if you have the slightest idea what that
is.....

What do you imagine that these invisible wave phases are built from? According to primary science textbook, they are built with electric and magnetic fluxes making right angles. Then where do these electric and magnetic fluxes
originate?


they can be explained by Maxwell's equations.

[snip rest of village idiot's ranting]

  #130  
Old June 6th 05, 12:47 PM
Lloyd Parker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
There are no rings. Learn QM.


If we operate oscillatory magnetism



If we make up gibberish...

from outside of superconductor having a ring form, there flows an electric

current persisting permanently even though we remove this oscillatory
external magnetism. It is called a persistent current built with moving
electrons. In this case the orbiting electron is no more a mass particle
with negative charge


What?

but is a current ring exerting only intensive magnetism without exerting

coulomb's force. This is an experimental truth, and not an assumption.


No, the electron has mass and has a negative charge. Always has and always
will.

Dr. Yoon says that orbital electron is a tiny persistent current ring like

that flowing through a superconductor. it appears you village idiot never
heard what is a superconductor and what is a persistent current with a ring
shape. newedana


Dr. Yoon can say the sky is green too. You'd support him.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Amateur Astronomy 6 June 21st 04 06:26 AM
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Astronomy Misc 0 June 20th 04 06:47 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney Amateur Astronomy 2 May 31st 04 04:30 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney SETI 0 May 30th 04 08:53 PM
when will our planet stop rotating? meat n potatoes Amateur Astronomy 61 March 27th 04 12:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.