"In Search of the Big Bang" (brief review)

There always is gravity Twake. But it is nonsigular. It is spread out.
The original energy must be spread out so that its gravity won't
be so strong as to prevent the big bang expansion.
Light/energy has gravity in General Relativity.

Began as light?
The original energy couldn't be light. It would produce matter/anti
matter in
equal amounts. Matter/anti matter would be alltogether in one place
without any possibility of seperating out.

Not possible.

wrote:
There always is gravity Twake. But it is nonsigular. It is spread out.
The original energy must be spread out so that its gravity won't
be so strong as to prevent the big bang expansion.
Light/energy has gravity in General Relativity.

Began as light?
The original energy couldn't be light. It would produce matter/anti
matter in
equal amounts. Matter/anti matter would be alltogether in one place
without any possibility of seperating out.

Not possible.

well dick.

what does nonsigular mean?

gravity works on mass. the original energy consisted of massless
photons. how did gravity play?

it produced matter/antimatter in almost equal amounts. your
understanding of this subject is so bad its painful.

how do you like that dick?

yt56erd wrote:
wrote:
There always is gravity Twake. But it is nonsigular. It is spread out.
The original energy must be spread out so that its gravity won't
be so strong as to prevent the big bang expansion.
Light/energy has gravity in General Relativity.

Began as light?
The original energy couldn't be light. It would produce matter/anti
matter in
equal amounts. Matter/anti matter would be alltogether in one place
without any possibility of seperating out.

Not possible.

well dick.

what does nonsigular mean?

gravity works on mass. the original energy consisted of massless
photons. how did gravity play?

it produced matter/antimatter in almost equal amounts. your
understanding of this subject is so bad its painful.

how do you like that dick?

well how do you like it?

yt56erd wrote:
yt56erd wrote:
wrote:
There always is gravity Twake. But it is nonsigular. It is spread out.
The original energy must be spread out so that its gravity won't
be so strong as to prevent the big bang expansion.
Light/energy has gravity in General Relativity.

Began as light?
The original energy couldn't be light. It would produce matter/anti
matter in
equal amounts. Matter/anti matter would be alltogether in one place
without any possibility of seperating out.

Not possible.

well dick.

what does nonsigular mean?

gravity works on mass. the original energy consisted of massless
photons. how did gravity play?

it produced matter/antimatter in almost equal amounts. your
understanding of this subject is so bad its painful.

how do you like that dick?

well how do you like it?

yt56erd wrote:
yt56erd wrote:
wrote:
There always is gravity Twake. But it is nonsigular. It is spread out.
The original energy must be spread out so that its gravity won't
be so strong as to prevent the big bang expansion.
Light/energy has gravity in General Relativity.

Began as light?
The original energy couldn't be light. It would produce matter/anti
matter in
equal amounts. Matter/anti matter would be alltogether in one place
without any possibility of seperating out.

Not possible.

well dick.

what does nonsigular mean?

gravity works on mass. the original energy consisted of massless
photons. how did gravity play?

it produced matter/antimatter in almost equal amounts. your
understanding of this subject is so bad its painful.

how do you like that dick?

well how do you like it?

Nick wrote:
nothing

well dickwad. i am going to follow whereever your asslike posts appear.
you are nothing but vapourus questions. do you even know the answer to
what time it is?

go to school, graduate, get a job, get laid, get a life then try to
talk to the big boys here dickwad.

Nonsingular is finite density

Gravity doesn't require mass. Energy will do the trick.
Learn GR. Moron.

"Nick" wrote in message
oups.com...
Nonsingular is finite density

Gravity doesn't require mass. Energy will do the trick.
Learn GR. Moron.


Gravity does require mass.

What is the gravitational strength of a photon?

As a sideline Nick, in part of my ongoing study into you I notice you
constantly talk about gravity and the phenomena associated with extremes of
gravity (Black Holes etc). Do you understand enough physics to appreciate
that while gravity may be a big player to humans, it is also the weakest
force in the universe?

Wrong Twake. Einstein says energy curves space.
That is his GR.

Show me where I am wrong

"Nick" wrote in message
oups.com...
Wrong Twake. Einstein says energy curves space.
That is his GR.

Show me where I am wrong


It says gravity curves spacetime.

Now its your turn Nick.

T Wake wrote:
"Nick" wrote in message
oups.com...
Wrong Twake. Einstein says energy curves space.
That is his GR.

Show me where I am wrong


It says gravity curves spacetime.

Now its your turn Nick.

So. Energy curves space-time.
Is that all you can say moron?
Time curves too.
Curved time is slower time.
Einstein says the overall curvature of energy is half
space and the other half time.
Show me where I am wrong.