New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

newedana wrote:
What bombarding electrons???

In order to get hydrogen spectrum in a usual way is to bombard orbital electrons of hydrogen atoms with external electrons accelerated.

That would be news to me. Reference, please.



And how does the manage to get the Rydberg frequency?

Niels Bohr obtained Rydberg frequency theoretically based on his atomic model

Which was wrong.


very precisely, but it is quite natural since Planck's constant h is
originally estimated from observed Rydberg frequency,

Wrong. Where on earth did you get that from???


and ionizing energy E is artificially modulated to be, E= hcν=2.18x10^-18 J,

What on earth is this supposed to mean?


where h: Planck constant, c: speed of light, ν: Rydberg frequency. Don't be
cheated so nicely!

Huh?


BTW, you did not answer my question: how did Yoon manage to get the
Rydberg frequeny in his model?



already told you that there is a strong analogy between the two!


Balmer equation is an empirically built equation, but Dr.Yoon's equation
is theoretically deduced one,

Please tell me how exactly he deduced it. Especially why the Rydberg
frequency appears in his formula. How did he manage to sneak that in?


based on the energy of orbital electron ring
E=E1 + E2, E: total energy, E1: energy for maintaining atomic structure, or
circling energy of orbital electron around its nucleus keeping its radius
constant until its energy capacity is saturated, E2: precessing energy
by absorbing external radiation, which is extractable as radiations.

Blah blah blah. Stop the rhetoric; you have told us this nonsense
already enough times.


In quantum atomic physics, as you may know, the energy of orbital electron
is E=(1/2+n)hv,

That is *utterly* wrong. This is *not* the energy of an electron in an
atom; these are the energy niveaus of a harmonic oscillator, which has
precisely nil to do with atomic physics!


in which 1/2hν is to maintain atomic structure,

Plain utter bull****ting *nonsense*.


which is nicely modulated by handwaving,

For example?


while nhν is extractable energy. How primitive is this equation?

Care to tell me what exactly you mean when you call an equation
"primitive"?



Anyway, how does he explain the photo effect without that equation? Or
the Compton effect? Or blackbody radiation?

I posted previously the Dr.Yoon's interpretation for Comton Effect with his different principle.

As usual, you posted merely a lot of rhetoric and handwaving, not
*one* *single* *quantitative* description.

And what about the photo effect and blackbody radiation?


Atomic energy has nothing to do with the stupid equation, E=mc^2.

What is stupid about this equation?

Care to tell me?


And how do you explain that it *works*?

Dr.Yoon's equation explaining hydrogen spectrum can explain also the
energy source of atomic nuclear fission and fusion.

Nice for him. However, that does *not* explain why the above equation
*works*: the energy released in nuclear reaction is related to the
mass difference of the nuclei *precisely* by E=mc^2. Hence the
equation *works*.-


He ridicules the stupid equation, E= hν as well

What is stupid about that?

And how does the explain the *quantitative* results of the photo
effect without it?


as A. Einstein's E=mc^2


The energy of one string vibration changes in proportional to its
frequency square.

Incomprehensible.


So his energy equation of electron rings emitting
hydrogen spectrum is, â–³E=E'[1/r^2 -1/(r+n)^2]^2.

But that equation does *not* agree with the observations!!!


E': energy of electron ring emitting Humpry series.

Why does E' appear in the formula?

[snip irrelevant rant]


Bye,
Bjoern