New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

In article . com,
"newedana" wrote:
What bombarding electrons???

In order to get hydrogen spectrum in a usual way is to bombard orbital
electrons of hydrogen atoms with external electrons accelerated.

And how does the manage to get the Rydberg frequency?

Niels Bohr obtained Rydberg frequency theoretically based on his atomic
model very precisely, but it is quite natural since Planck's constant h is
originally estimated from observed Rydberg frequency, and ionizing energy E
is artificially modulated to be, E= hcν=2.18x10^-18 J, where h: Planck
constant, c: speed of light, ν: Rydberg frequency. Don't be cheated so
nicely!

already told you that there is a strong analogy between the two!

Balmer equation is an empirically built equation, but Dr.Yoon's equation
is theoretically deduced one, based on the energy of orbital electron ring,
E=E1 + E2, E: total energy, E1: energy for maintaining atomic structure, or
circling energy of orbital electron around its nucleus keeping its radius
constant until its energy capacity is saturated, E2: precessing energy by
absorbing external radiation, which is extractable as radiations. In quantum
atomic physics, as you may know, the energy of orbital electron is
E=(1/2+n)hv, in which 1/2hν is to maintain atomic structure,which is nicely
modulated by handwaving, while nhν is extractable energy. How primitive is
this equation?


Anyway, how does he explain the photo effect without that equation? Or
the Compton effect? Or blackbody radiation?

I posted previously the Dr.Yoon's interpretation for Comton Effect with
his different principle.

Atomic energy has nothing to do with the stupid equation, E=mc^2.

What is stupid about this equation? And how do you explain that it
*works*?

Dr.Yoon's equation explaining hydrogen spectrum can explain also the
energy source of atomic nuclear fission and fusion. He ridicules the stupid
equation, E= hν as well as A. Einstein's E=mc^2
The energy of one string vibration changes in proportional to its
frequency square. So his energy equation of electron rings emitting
hydrogen spectrum is, â–³E=E'[1/r^2 -1/(r+n)^2]^2. E': energy of
electron ring emitting Humpry series. When n=infinite, â–³E=E'(1/r^4).
The explosive TNT is a compound with three -NO2 on toluene molecules.
These radicals are bound by their outermost electron rings by their
expansion of a little bit. However, suppose that uranium atoms with
atomic volume 12.5 turn into two Pb(lead) atoms with atomic volume
18.3. All of their 46 electron rings in K, L, M,. . . . . shells have
to redistribute over newly created two Pb atoms by expanding their
radii all at once, when there occurs the atomic fission of uranium 235.
But their radial expansion is not so remarkable since energy of
orbital electron ring is inversely proportional to 4 powers of radius.
Nevertheless an enormous energy emission takes place there. It is the
source of atomic fission energy. Newedana wrote

Fission has nothing to do with electrons. You're an idiot.

Fission has nothing to do with electrons. You're an idiot.

You are quite free to believe such a stupid equation, E=Mc^2. But you have to reconsider if you are going to teach younger generations of science students who are eager to know what is the atomic nuclear energy.
If you explain atomic fission and fusion energy you have to utiize this same stupid equation E=mc^2. However, according to current physics, atomic fission and fusion are philosopically opposit reaction, right???. But both reactions are exothermic. It is not a science but a comics. Yoon explains both nuclear reactions with atomic electron rings and nuclear electron rings without violating any natural law, unlike your particle physicists do. Newedana

it is not a science for those people who find mathematics as
dispensible, like you Hansik Yoon AKA Newedana. some people think that
you can make a "correct" theory by doing away with the complicated
mathematics which they cannot comprehend or can be bothered to
understand. well, nature is complex and not high school maths theory
as you have out it. get an education git.

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
Fission has nothing to do with electrons. You're an idiot.

You are quite free to believe such a stupid equation, E=Mc^2. But you have
to reconsider if you are going to teach younger generations of science
students who are eager to know what is the atomic nuclear energy.

We teach them just fine thank you. Too bad nobody taught you.

If you explain atomic fission and fusion energy you have to utiize this
same stupid equation E=mc^2. However, according to current physics, atomic
fission and fusion are philosopically opposit reaction, right???.

Yes and no. They both involve nuclear binding energy.


But both reactions are exothermic. It is not a science but a comics.

Funny, I was thinking the same thing about you.


Yoon explains both nuclear reactions with atomic electron rings and nuclear
electron rings without violating any natural law, unlike your particle
physicists do.

You're a liar.

Newedana

You are quite free to believe such a stupid equation, E=Mc^2. But you have to reconsider if you are going to teach younger generations of science students who are eager to know what is the atomic nuclear energy.
If you explain atomic fission and fusion energy you have to utiize this same stupid equation E=mc^2. However, according to current physics, atomic fission and fusion are philosopically opposit reaction, right???. But both reactions are exothermic. It is not a science but a comics. Yoon explains both nuclear reactions with atomic electron rings and nuclear electron rings without violating any natural law, unlike your particle physicists do. Newedana