A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 23rd 05, 11:35 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

uhmmm, why has this guy only published two papers in his entire
academic career? how is it that someone (Yoon) who lacks experience and
has made only a miniscule contribution to science suddenly comes up
with an answer to everything (though only according to him because of
his crankiness)

  #3  
Old May 24th 05, 12:31 PM
Lloyd Parker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article . com,
"Waldo Tall" wrote:
wrote:
uhmmm, why has this guy only published two papers in his entire
academic career? how is it that someone (Yoon) who lacks experience

and
has made only a miniscule contribution to science suddenly comes up
with an answer to everything (though only according to him because of
his crankiness)



How many tons of papers did you waste for your academic contribution,
bryant_j_j?

According to Dr. Yoon's resume, he worked almost 30 years at the top
Korean research center and retired as a chair scientist, and the Korean
version of Yoon's book was known to public since 1999. What's your
experience?


1. Anybody can make up a resume.
2. Yoon is full of crap.
3. What's your scientific background?


Suddenly? Only to you. The world is changing very rapidly. Don't you
know that?

  #7  
Old May 24th 05, 12:31 PM
Lloyd Parker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
"Waldo Tall" wrote:
wrote:
uhmmm, why has this guy only published two papers in his entire
academic career? how is it that someone (Yoon) who lacks experience

and
has made only a miniscule contribution to science suddenly comes up
with an answer to everything (though only according to him because of
his crankiness)



How many tons of papers did you waste for your academic contribution,
bryant_j_j?

According to Dr. Yoon's resume, he worked almost 30 years at the top
Korean research center and retired as a chair scientist, and the Korean
version of Yoon's book was known to public since 1999. What's your
experience?

Suddenly? Only to you. The world is changing very rapidly. Don't you
know that?


Gee, you discovered cut and paste. Maybe you'll discover science next.
  #8  
Old May 25th 05, 11:10 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

it is sudden and Yoon is a crank. maybe you are as well.

  #9  
Old May 25th 05, 10:59 AM
newedana
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

uhmmm, why has this guy only published two papers in his entire
academic career? how is it that someone (Yoon) who lacks experience and

has made only a miniscule contribution to science suddenly comes up
with an answer to everything (though only according to him because of
his crankiness)


I know James Watson wrote a paper concerned to DNA double helix in Nature in 1953, which had only one page that corresponded less than 1/3 of the space of the present Nature. He wrote that paper during his one year stay as a guest scientist at Kings College in U. K. With this single little paper he received Nobel Medical Price 1n 1962. After he published this paper in Nature in 1953, no more technical papers, but wrote a voluminous textbook of bio-chemistry. I think Dr. Yoon is the same case. After publishing his paper in nature in 1987 it seems he began to write a textbook of natural science. His two papers published in Nature vol 326 and the others in MRS, Symposium Proceedings, vol.174 are really monumental works in the history of natural science, particularly in the field of fiber science and bio-science. I am sure any fiber scientist and biological scientist should read these two papers, otherwise all of their work would be remained obsolete. I find extention of these two papers is pricisely discribed in his textbook( www.yoonsatom.net)Newedana


  #10  
Old May 25th 05, 11:06 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

you are the only one claiming his work is important, right? does
anybody else out there think so? c'mon don't compare you to Watson. his
work is widely recognized, even to people outside his area. what about
Yoon? he is unknown, even to people in biochemistry or whatever area he
specializes in (if any)..... and Watson may have written a voluminous
textbook, but he didn't set out to change the whole subject and do it
alone like some kind of mad scientist, like Yoon. that's why Watson is
a nobel prize winner while Yoon is a crank with a capita l c.

say Newedana, you aren't Yoon are ya?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Amateur Astronomy 6 June 21st 04 06:26 AM
new paradigm for physics update Gary Forbat Astronomy Misc 0 June 20th 04 06:47 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney Amateur Astronomy 2 May 31st 04 04:30 AM
The Paradigm Shift Revolution of Physics Stephen Mooney SETI 0 May 30th 04 08:53 PM
when will our planet stop rotating? meat n potatoes Amateur Astronomy 61 March 27th 04 12:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.