![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bohr's atomic model and other primitive models like Quantum oscillator
were established before the discovery of neutron in 1934. These atomic models are imperfect and incorrect even in explaining hydrogen spectrum in addition to their numerous fallacies. However the hydrogen spectrum can be more scientifically analyzed by Dr. Yoon's physics. The wavelength of all 6 sets of hydrogen spectra, Humprey, Pfund, Brackett, Ritz-Paschen, Balmer, and Lyman, calculated by Dr. Hansik Yoon's formula surprisingly coincided with the experimentally observed ones. Of course, Dr. Yoon didn't use such unscientific models as QM or relativity in this calculation. Moreover, his formula estimated (predicted) other wavelengths not yet observed up to the time. For example, in the case of Ritz-Paschen series, the estimated wavelengths were 8201.40 Angstrom,... 8860.40, 9012.5, 9226.6, 9545.97(*), 10049.4(*), 10938.1(*), 12818.1(*), etc. Here, wavelengths with (*) symbol have been experimentally observed up to the time. In the case of Lyman series, 911.269A,... 926.226(*), 930.748(*), 937.803(*), 949.743(*), 972.537(*), 1025.722(*), 1215.668(*). If someone already observed the wavelengths without (*) symbol, try to observe the Pfund series, 22781.2A, ... 28714.5, 3.375.6, 32952.1, 37385.4, 46525.1(*), 74578.0(*) etc. According to Dr. Yoon's theory on the hydrogen spectrum, for Lyman series the bombarding electrons must have a frequency of longitudinal oscillation resonant to the frequency of 'orbital electron rings' with radial parameter gamma= 1 in order them to oscillate without destructing it. The energy capacity of orbital electron ring with radial parameter gamma = 1 that emits Lyman series of hydrogen spectrum is at least 1295 times greater than the electron ring with radial parameter gamma=6 that emits Humphrey series. This is just an example of scientific facts among many breakthroughs in Dr. Yoon's book. Dr. Yoon also proved that the light is not a flow of photons in Part II, Chapter 5(www.yoonsatom.net). Many people seem to be very ignorant of the breadth and depth of Dr. Yoon's new physics, at these days. newedana wrote what learned from Dr. Yoon's "Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
newedana wrote:
Bohr's atomic model and other primitive models like Quantum oscillator Why exactly are these "primitive"? were established before the discovery of neutron in 1934. Indeed. So what? These atomic models are imperfect You are right: Bohr's atomic model is imperfect. Hint: that's why it hasn't been used for about 80 years. and incorrect even in explaining hydrogen spectrum Indeed. Hint: that's why it hasn't been used for about 80 years. in addition to their numerous fallacies. For example? However the hydrogen spectrum can be more scientifically analyzed by Dr. Yoon's physics. The wavelength of all 6 sets of hydrogen spectra, Humprey, Pfund, Brackett, Ritz-Paschen, Balmer, and Lyman, calculated by Dr. Hansik Yoon's formula surprisingly coincided with the experimentally observed ones. Please give the formula and tell us how it was derived. Of course, Dr. Yoon didn't use such unscientific models as QM or relativity in this calculation. Why are these unscientific? Moreover, his formula estimated (predicted) other wavelengths not yet observed up to the time. ROTFL! Hint: if a model predicts something which is not observed, the model is in deep trouble. For example, in the case of Ritz-Paschen series, the estimated wavelengths were 8201.40 Angstrom,... 8860.40, 9012.5, 9226.6, 9545.97(*), 10049.4(*), 10938.1(*), 12818.1(*), etc. Here, wavelengths with (*) symbol have been experimentally observed up to the time. In the case of Lyman series, 911.269A,... 926.226(*), 930.748(*), 937.803(*), 949.743(*), 972.537(*), 1025.722(*), 1215.668(*). If someone already observed the wavelengths without (*) symbol, try to observe the Pfund series, 22781.2A, ... 28714.5, 3.375.6, 32952.1, 37385.4, 46525.1(*), 74578.0(*) etc. According to Dr. Yoon's theory on the hydrogen spectrum, for Lyman series the bombarding electrons What bombarding electrons??? must have a frequency of longitudinal oscillation resonant to the frequency of 'orbital electron rings' with radial parameter gamma= 1 in order them to oscillate without destructing it. The energy capacity of orbital electron ring with radial parameter gamma = 1 that emits Lyman series of hydrogen spectrum is at least 1295 times greater than the electron ring with radial parameter gamma=6 that emits Humphrey series. This is just an example of scientific facts among many breakthroughs in Dr. Yoon's book. Try to understand the difference between "fact" and "unsupported assertion". Dr. Yoon also proved that the light is not a flow of photons in Part II, Chapter 5(www.yoonsatom.net). And how exactly did he do that? Many people seem to be very ignorant of the breadth and depth of Dr. Yoon's new physics, at these days. newedana wrote what learned from Dr. Yoon's "Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model". But we are wekk aware of his arrogance, ignorance, and refusal to deal with the evidence. Bye, Bjoern |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
newedana:
Bohr's atomic model and other primitive models like Quantum oscillator were established before the discovery of neutron in 1934. These atomic models are imperfect and incorrect even in explaining hydrogen spectrum in addition to their numerous fallacies. Well, let's see - the bohr model is about 95 years old and was replaced almost 95 years ago by the bohr-sommerfeld model, which was replaced almost 80 years ago by quantum mechanics and refined about 75 years ago by dirac's theory. Why would you expect an alternative to the bohr model to be of any interest? Aside from your misguided notions of ``primative,'' why would you expect the harmonic oscillator to be a model of the hydrogen atom? The potential for the harmonic oscillator is proportional to r^2. The coulomb potential is proportional to 1/r. Does that look the same to you? However the hydrogen spectrum can be more scientifically analyzed by Dr. Yoon's physics. Why, is he analyzing the hydrogen atom using qed? If not, what does he predict for the 2s - 1s transition rate? How about the lamb shift? Qute honestly, if you are having to create strawmen from a theory that outlived its purpose before 1920 and a theory which isn't even applicable to the question, to peddle your alternative, you should quit before you get further behind. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() MIDI is the mid-infrared (N-band =3D 8 to 13 =B5m) instrument of the VLT interferometer. It combines two beams (either from the 8.2-m Unit Telescopes or from the 1.8-m Auxiliary Telescopes) to provide visibility moduli in the (u,v) plane. MIDI features spectroscopic optics to provide visibilities at different wavelengths within the N-band. OCA F-NICE UNSA F-NICE LAOG F-GRENOBLE MPIfR D-BONN OAA I-FIRENZE Last update 2002-oct-25 Questions or comments about this site ? Contact Romain Petrov and Pascal Puget =20 http://www.obs-nice.fr/amber/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "newedana" wrote in message oups.com... Bohr's atomic model and other primitive models like Quantum oscillator were established before the discovery of neutron in 1934. And have long since been replaced by QM and later QFT. These atomic models are imperfect and incorrect even in explaining hydrogen spectrum in addition to their numerous fallacies. Which is why they were replaced. However the hydrogen spectrum can be more scientifically analyzed by Dr. Yoon's physics. Does it use QFT? If not in what way is it better than QFT? Bill The wavelength of all 6 sets of hydrogen spectra, Humprey, Pfund, Brackett, Ritz-Paschen, Balmer, and Lyman, calculated by Dr. Hansik Yoon's formula surprisingly coincided with the experimentally observed ones. Of course, Dr. Yoon didn't use such unscientific models as QM or relativity in this calculation. Moreover, his formula estimated (predicted) other wavelengths not yet observed up to the time. For example, in the case of Ritz-Paschen series, the estimated wavelengths were 8201.40 Angstrom,... 8860.40, 9012.5, 9226.6, 9545.97(*), 10049.4(*), 10938.1(*), 12818.1(*), etc. Here, wavelengths with (*) symbol have been experimentally observed up to the time. In the case of Lyman series, 911.269A,... 926.226(*), 930.748(*), 937.803(*), 949.743(*), 972.537(*), 1025.722(*), 1215.668(*). If someone already observed the wavelengths without (*) symbol, try to observe the Pfund series, 22781.2A, ... 28714.5, 3.375.6, 32952.1, 37385.4, 46525.1(*), 74578.0(*) etc. According to Dr. Yoon's theory on the hydrogen spectrum, for Lyman series the bombarding electrons must have a frequency of longitudinal oscillation resonant to the frequency of 'orbital electron rings' with radial parameter gamma= 1 in order them to oscillate without destructing it. The energy capacity of orbital electron ring with radial parameter gamma = 1 that emits Lyman series of hydrogen spectrum is at least 1295 times greater than the electron ring with radial parameter gamma=6 that emits Humphrey series. This is just an example of scientific facts among many breakthroughs in Dr. Yoon's book. Dr. Yoon also proved that the light is not a flow of photons in Part II, Chapter 5(www.yoonsatom.net). Many people seem to be very ignorant of the breadth and depth of Dr. Yoon's new physics, at these days. newedana wrote what learned from Dr. Yoon's "Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In page 64~65 of Dr.Yoon's New Physics, "If we arrange these 6 sets
of hydrogen spectra on an energy scale based on their wavelengths, we find an energy interval between each set of these spectral series, as shown in Fig.5-5-1, and table 5-2 (a map of spectral series). It signifies that there exists an energy gap(barrier) between each set of spectra. The largest energy gap is found between Lyman and Balmer series, the secondary larger gab is between Balmer and Ritz-Paschen series and no energy gap between Ritz-Paschen and Brackett series. After Brackett series, we find that their spectral series turn out to overlap with one another, and the overlapping zone becomes progressively broader and broader". He explains for this finding that when the radius of orbital electron ring expands to be out of the size of emitting Ritz-Paschen and Brackett series, it can take up electromagnetic radiations without frequency choice. That is why the spectra emitted by these orbital electron rings has like a continuous pattern, and any kind of mass bodies can takes up heat radiation without wavelength choice. He explains further that as the orbital electron ring shrinks to be shorter and shorter in reverse, the energy gap increases to be greater and greater to be reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its radius, and it takes up radiation energy selectively by frequency choice. It is concerned to directly to black body radiation. And that is why orbital electron ring becomes increasingly difficult to approach its nucleus. He assumed that this energy barrier originates to the restructuring the texturized electric and magnetic force fluxes produced by orbital electron rings, as it changes its orbital radius; the shorter the radius of electron ring the greater the energy input for the restructuring its electromagnetic force fluxes. When the shrunk orbital electron ring expands its radius it has to emit reversely this energy it absorbed. This fact is closely related with atomic fission and fusion energy. Atomic energy has nothing to do with the stupid equation, E=mc^2. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "newedana" wrote in message ups.com... In page 64~65 of Dr.Yoon's New Physics, "If we arrange these 6 sets of hydrogen spectra on an energy scale based on their wavelengths, we find an energy interval between each set of these spectral series, as shown in Fig.5-5-1, and table 5-2 (a map of spectral series). It signifies that there exists an energy gap(barrier) between each set of spectra. The largest energy gap is found between Lyman and Balmer series, the secondary larger gab is between Balmer and Ritz-Paschen series and no energy gap between Ritz-Paschen and Brackett series. After Brackett series, we find that their spectral series turn out to overlap with one another, and the overlapping zone becomes progressively broader and broader". He explains for this finding that when the radius of orbital electron ring expands to be out of the size of emitting Ritz-Paschen and Brackett series, it can take up electromagnetic radiations without frequency choice. That is why the spectra emitted by these orbital electron rings has like a continuous pattern, and any kind of mass bodies can takes up heat radiation without wavelength choice. He explains further that as the orbital electron ring shrinks to be shorter and shorter in reverse, the energy gap increases to be greater and greater to be reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its radius, and it takes up radiation energy selectively by frequency choice. It is concerned to directly to black body radiation. And that is why orbital electron ring becomes increasingly difficult to approach its nucleus. He assumed that this energy barrier originates to the restructuring the texturized electric and magnetic force fluxes produced by orbital electron rings, 'texturized electric and magnetic force fluxes'? When you can express your ideas coherently then we may have something to discuss. Bill as it changes its orbital radius; the shorter the radius of electron ring the greater the energy input for the restructuring its electromagnetic force fluxes. When the shrunk orbital electron ring expands its radius it has to emit reversely this energy it absorbed. This fact is closely related with atomic fission and fusion energy. Atomic energy has nothing to do with the stupid equation, E=mc^2. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
newedana wrote:
In page 64~65 of Dr.Yoon's New Physics, [snip crap] Purest bull****. Crap spewing like a fountain. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() newedana wrote: In page 64~65 of Dr.Yoon's New Physics, "If we arrange these 6 sets of hydrogen spectra on an energy scale based on their wavelengths, we find an energy interval between each set of these spectral series, as shown in Fig.5-5-1, and table 5-2 (a map of spectral series). It signifies that there exists an energy gap(barrier) between each set of spectra. The largest energy gap is found between Lyman and Balmer series, the secondary larger gab is between Balmer and Ritz-Paschen series and no energy gap between Ritz-Paschen and Brackett series. After Brackett series, we find that their spectral series turn out to overlap with one another, and the overlapping zone becomes progressively broader and broader". He explains for this finding that when the radius of orbital electron ring expands to be out of the size of emitting Ritz-Paschen and Brackett series, it can take up electromagnetic radiations without frequency choice. That is why the spectra emitted by these orbital electron rings has like a continuous pattern, and any kind of mass bodies can takes up heat radiation without wavelength choice. He explains further that as the orbital electron ring shrinks to be shorter and shorter in reverse, the energy gap increases to be greater and greater to be reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its radius, and it takes up radiation energy selectively by frequency choice. It is concerned to directly to black body radiation. And that is why orbital electron ring becomes increasingly difficult to approach its nucleus. He assumed that this energy barrier originates to the restructuring the texturized electric and magnetic force fluxes produced by orbital electron rings, as it changes its orbital radius; the shorter the radius of electron ring the greater the energy input for the restructuring its electromagnetic force fluxes. When the shrunk orbital electron ring expands its radius it has to emit reversely this energy it absorbed. This fact is closely related with atomic fission and fusion energy. Atomic energy has nothing to do with the stupid equation, E=mc^2. Hi Newedana, How did your Dr. Yoon explain Black Body Radiation? What is the mechanism that prevented Ultraviolet Catastrophe since you guys don't believe in Planck when he said that it is not possible for an oscillator to absorb and emit energy in a continuous range and it must gain and lose energy discontinuously, in small indivisible units of e = h f, which Planck called "energy quanta". So do you guys believe it is continuous? If so, why is the high frequency in the em waves prevented from forming avoiding the so called ultraviolet catastrophe in black body radiation? Going to atomic dynamics. Classical laws says that revolving electron would radiate away its energy and collapse into the nucleus. Granted your magnetic field induced in the electron electric field tails (lagging effect) through some unknown mechanism can repel the nucleus in a kinda of modified Meissner like effect attributing for its stability similar to the de_broglie standing waves holding the orbitals, how do you account for the fact the your continuously revolving electron and charge never radiate or lose the energy? If classical laws is right. It should radiate and the magnetic field induced at the electric field tail should diminish in power since the electron decelerates until the electron just collapse into the nucleus. What prevented it?? Pls. don't miss answering the separate inquiries here, the Black body explanation and the revolving electron puzzle according to the world of Dr. Yoon. zhayne |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The quantum oscillator( atomic model whose orbital electron is
explained with Schrodinger equation) takes up any photons without conditions. For example, it can take up U.V., visible, I.R photons and even x-ray photons without any discrimination of their frequency, coincidence of their oscillatory wave phases, and incoming directionality of em and etc. However, Dr. Yoon's atomic model does not allow such a blind absorption of em wave energy. It requires 4 conditions in order to increase its energy level by taking up external em wave energy. 1) The electron ring has to have resonant frequency to that of incoming em; the same or integer multiple frequency relation between them. 2) Provided that first condition is fulfilled, there must exist an energy gradient between the orbital electron ring and incoming em, in terms of their oscillatory amplitudes. 3) Provided that the first and second conditions are satisfied, the oscillatory direction of orbital electron ring must have a favorable angle against the preceeding direction of incoming em for the effective energy exchange between them. 4) Provided further that the first, second and third conditions are fulfilled, the orbital electron ring has to have coincidental oscillatory phase with that of incoming em. Otherwise there occurs a considerable destructive phase interference between them. These 4 conditions are needed strictly in order to explain the black body radiation, as well as the mechanism of forming laser light. (explanation of laser light by QM theory is totally false). If the probability of satisfying condition 1) by an electron ring exposed in a continuous spectrum is P(1), the probability for condition 2), P(2), the probability for condition 3), P(3), and the final probability for condition 4), P(4), then total probability P to satisfy all the five conditions becomes, P=P(1)P(2)P(3)P(4). It signifies that an orbital electron ring is very difficult to have successively a lucky chance to meet a favorable em from which it can take up energy, and the same is in the reverse case when an electron ring has the worst chance to meet the favorable em from which it can also take up energy. Consequently the other group of atomic electron rings distributes between these two extreme cases. Thus the energy taken up by orbital electron rings by frequency wise, would draw a curve that has indeed a marked resemblance to that obtained from maxwell's distribution law. This is the explanation of black body radiation as well as avoiding ultraviolet catastrophe. Going to atomic dynamics. Classical laws says that revolving electron would radiate away its energy and collapse into the nucleus. Granted your magnetic field induced in the electron electric field tails (lagging effect) through some unknown mechanism can repel the nucleus in a kinda of modified Meissner like effect attributing for its stability similar to the de_broglie standing waves holding the orbitals, how do you account for the fact the your continuously revolving electron and charge never radiate or lose the energy? If classical laws is right. It should radiate and the magnetic field induced at the electric field tail should diminish in power since the electron decelerates until the electron just collapse into the nucleus. What prevented it?? Revolving electron is not an oscillatory motion, so it does not emit energy, as though the earth revolving around the sun does not lose its kinetic energy. Oscillation means the energy oscillation between two forms of energies commutable, for example, between kinetic and potential energy, or between electric and magnetic energy. Thus there occurs no energy oscillation between its electric and magnetic energies of revolving electron around its nucleus. As mentioned previously, Dr. Yoon's electron ring never merges into its nucleus, because the energy barrier between each step of its radial reduction increases reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its radial parameter. Its texturized electric and magnetic force fluxes (magnetic force fluxes are always induced on perpendicular planes of electric force fluxes) have to be restructured as the electron ring changes its radius. This is the origin of energy barrier. newedana |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Single photon double slit expe interpretation | Greysky | Misc | 10 | January 10th 05 04:35 PM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 04 02:35 AM |
Beyond Linear Cosmology and Hypnotic Theology | Yoda | Misc | 0 | June 30th 04 07:33 PM |
Empirically Refuted Superluminal Velocities. | EL | Astronomy Misc | 22 | October 31st 03 04:07 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |