![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
*follow-ups trimmed*
"John Savard" wrote ... If China were weak and helpless, Tibet would have been liberated long ago. Therefore, for China not to be weak and helpless is bad, because China's not being weak and helpless is contributing to innocent people getting hurt. Where is the flaw in that logic? About four lines up from your question. If China was weak and helpless (relative to current state anyway) it does not follow that Tibet would have been liberated. Whether relatively weak countries, regardless of their mistreatment of those within their (current) borders are interferred with is dependent on the whims of the external governments involved and the politics of the moment. Balkans style informal civil war and ethinic cleansing would be a distinct possibility, and not necessarilly an improvement from Tibet's point of view. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
International Space Station Science - One of NASA's rising stars | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 27th 03 01:32 PM |
JimO: "Chinese space advances benefit everyone" | James Oberg | Space Station | 56 | October 22nd 03 09:52 PM |