New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.

It appears you do not know both the gravitation and coulomb's law. If
you camculate the ratio of gravitation and repulsion acting between two
electrons using these two equations, the repulsion between them comes
out as 4.17x10^41 times as great as the gravitation. Do you still
believe these lightest atoms or molecules can gather automatically to a
place? All QM man believe like that way? Bha!

newedana wrote:
there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.

It appears you do not know both the gravitation and coulomb's law.

Suggestion: don't always search for the error on *my* side when you
disagree with something I wrote.


If you camculate the ratio of gravitation and repulsion acting between two
electrons using these two equations, the repulsion between them comes
out as 4.17x10^41 times as great as the gravitation.

Indeed. Your point? What has that to do with *atoms* coming together???


Do you still
believe these lightest atoms or molecules can gather automatically to a
place?

Indeed, they can, due to gravity. Hint: atoms are neutral. There is no
Coulomb repulsion between them.

Thanks for showing your complete ignorance of basic science, yet again.


All QM man believe like that way? Bha!

You should "Bha!" to yourself.


Bye,
Bjoern

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.

It appears you do not know both the gravitation and coulomb's law. If
you camculate the ratio of gravitation and repulsion acting between two
electrons using these two equations, the repulsion between them comes
out as 4.17x10^41 times as great as the gravitation. Do you still
believe these lightest atoms or molecules can gather automatically to a
place? All QM man believe like that way? Bha!


So where are you claiming great numbers of electrons aggregate?