New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

You didn't read whole arguments newedana said. Do you belive that the
lightest elements such as hydrogen, deuterium and helium atom can
gather to a place without compressing them? If you belives so how do
you explain the decrement of entrophy, and a baloon filled with such
gases turns out to explode at high altitude of the air phase? How can
the sun collect such cosmic gases from the space for fuel of its
nuclear fusion? Don't believe blindly the ridiculous assumptions of
pioneer of physics, particularly the particle physicists. newedana says
to Bjoen Feuerbacher

newedana wrote:
You didn't read whole arguments newedana said.

It contained no quantitative description and no evidence. Merely
unsupported assertions and word salad. As usual.


Do you belive that the
lightest elements such as hydrogen, deuterium and helium atom can
gather to a place without compressing them?

If there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.


If you belives so how do
you explain the decrement of entrophy,

If gravity draws them to each other, entropy does not decrease. Do the
math.


and a baloon filled with such
gases turns out to explode at high altitude of the air phase?

Try to understand pressure.


How can
the sun collect such cosmic gases from the space for fuel of its
nuclear fusion?

The sun doesn't collect cosmic gases for fusion. Where did you get
that strange idea from?

The sun contained the gases which now undergo fusion right from its birth!


Don't believe blindly the ridiculous assumptions of
pioneer of physics,

Like Dr. Yoon.


particularly the particle physicists.

I don't blindly believe particle physicists. I look at the data they
provide, and compare them with the theoretical predictions.

When will Dr. Yoon start doing that?


Bye,
Bjoern

there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.

It appears you do not know both the gravitation and coulomb's law. If
you camculate the ratio of gravitation and repulsion acting between two
electrons using these two equations, the repulsion between them comes
out as 4.17x10^41 times as great as the gravitation. Do you still
believe these lightest atoms or molecules can gather automatically to a
place? All QM man believe like that way? Bha!

newedana wrote:
there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.

It appears you do not know both the gravitation and coulomb's law.

Suggestion: don't always search for the error on *my* side when you
disagree with something I wrote.


If you camculate the ratio of gravitation and repulsion acting between two
electrons using these two equations, the repulsion between them comes
out as 4.17x10^41 times as great as the gravitation.

Indeed. Your point? What has that to do with *atoms* coming together???


Do you still
believe these lightest atoms or molecules can gather automatically to a
place?

Indeed, they can, due to gravity. Hint: atoms are neutral. There is no
Coulomb repulsion between them.

Thanks for showing your complete ignorance of basic science, yet again.


All QM man believe like that way? Bha!

You should "Bha!" to yourself.


Bye,
Bjoern

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.

It appears you do not know both the gravitation and coulomb's law. If
you camculate the ratio of gravitation and repulsion acting between two
electrons using these two equations, the repulsion between them comes
out as 4.17x10^41 times as great as the gravitation. Do you still
believe these lightest atoms or molecules can gather automatically to a
place? All QM man believe like that way? Bha!


So where are you claiming great numbers of electrons aggregate?