New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
Your quantum physicists do not know in reality how can the orbital
electron of atoms generate electromagnetic waves with wavelengths
ranging from gammer rays to microwaves. You better read Dr.Yoon's text.

You're an idiot. A blooming idiot.

You will find how beautifully he could explain the mechanism of
generating such electromaghetic waves with a variety of wavelengths by
atoms. The mechanism is exactly the same as that of generating radio
waves with a RC resonant circuit. Perhaps you will find that how
scientific is his explanation. You admit that gammer rays, x-rays, Uv,
visible lights infrared, micro waves and radio waves are all included
in the same family of electromagnetic energy waves. So they should have
the same mechanism of generating them by orbital electrons, right? Then
have you ever heard such a science decribing the mechanism of
generating a variety of electromagnetic wave by atoms? But, perhaps you
may have no doubt, microwaves constructing proton NMR( nuclear magnetic
resonance) spectrum are generated by protons magnetically resonated by
field magnetism, because QM theory says so. But according to Dr. Yoon's
science it is a big mistate! I am sure you would say, how on earth did
Yoon manage to obtain a PhD. He apparenty knows less than many layman
crackpots. However Dr. Yoon says in his book, quantum mechanical
interpretation of emitting NMR is one of the biggest lie in the history
of human science. The signal of NMR spectrum has nothing to do with
proton's magnetic resonance. It also comes from the orbital electron
ring of hydrogen atom. QM physicists are quite ignorant as to the
dimension of proton, compared with a hydrogen atom. It has merely
1/10^15 of hydrogen atom. Do you know how large is the dimension of
microwave's wavelength? It is 0,1mm to 10 dm. really huge compared to
the dimension of proton. In the standard text, hydrogen atom can
generate electromagnetic waves with wavlength of maximum 1,23 micron.
So such a tiny sized proton can never generate microwaves with such a
huge wavelengths. It appears that the quantum mechanists could say this
kind of big lie during the last 20th century, because they are
completely ignorant for the mechanism of generating electromagnetic
waves by atoms, and even for radio waves generated by RC resonant
circuits. I find in his book it is explaind very scientifically the
mechanism of emitting and absorbing microwaves by electron rings of
hydrogen atoms involved in test chemicals, with the aid of field
magnetism, which construct so called NMR spectrum. newedana says to
Bjoen Feuerbacher


Dr. Yoon is a quack.

Where does the earth's heat come from?
habshi - Apr 24, 2:27 pm
How much comes from the sun and how much from the internal radioactive
sources ? If the latter is the major part could it be the reason Venus
is so hot ?
read more =BB 5 new of 10 messages - 8 authors

I like to suggest to all of you to refer the newadenas reply for above
question, "Where does the earth's heat come from? Dr.Yoon denys ont
only A. Einstein but also Bethe's thought. The energy source of the sun
is not the nuclear fusion of deuterium or hydrogen atoms distributed in
the cosmic space, as people today believes, but is the fusion of bare
deuterons coexisting in the neutron mass building the core phase of the
sun. Deuteron is made possible by coupling a neutron and a proton
produced by beta-decay of neutron. The electro ring of hydrogen atom
shrinks to be the nearest to its nucleus due to absorption of energy,
and it makes its proton be a neutron. It is called nuclear electron
ring which can bind two protons to be a proton and a neutron; while
electron locates over a proton it makes a neutron. Thus the oscillatory
frequency changing between proton and neutron is enormous. This binding
force is nothing else than the nuclear strong force. As you may know in
the case of hydrogen bomb, deuterium atoms are combined to lithium as a
solid metal halide. So the nuclear fusion between deuterons is made
possible in such an ultra critical environment given by explosion of
atomic bomb. So that Dr.Yoon overlooks that the controllable hot
nuclear fusion experiment led by main stream physicists is not so
promising, because the energy required in preparing such an ultra
environment of unclear fusion is enormous, surpassing the out put
energy by nuclear fusion. And the container material to keep the fusion
environment is a real problem. However, cold nuclear fusion is
promising if scientists today abandon the statistical concept over the
scientific phenomena. Number of experimental evidences for a possiblity
of cold nuclear fusion were reported, and energy division of fedral
government in the USA is reviewing the possibility of cold nuclear
fusion. Another revolutionay suggestion to be taken account by particle
physicists is in Dr.Yoon's book which was introduced by newedana that
will be found in the same google topics, sci.physics; Why alloys have
lowerer melting points than any of component pure metals? Can you
calculate the reason with QM theory? Can you explain why uranium atom
has lesser volume, 12.5, than that of hydrogen atom, 14.1, with QM
calculation?

newedana wrote:

[snip]

I like to suggest to all of you to refer the newadenas reply for above
question, "Where does the earth's heat come from? Dr.Yoon denys ont
only A. Einstein but also Bethe's thought. The energy source of the sun
is not the nuclear fusion of deuterium or hydrogen atoms distributed in
the cosmic space, as people today believes,

How strongly does Dr. Yoon want to demonstrate that he is an ignorant
idiot who doesn't care for evidence?

Every single observation made of the sun so far is consistent with the
idea of nuclear fusion going on in it, including the neutrino
observations of SNO. How does Dr. Yoon explain this ugly fact?


but is the fusion of bare
deuterons coexisting in the neutron mass building the core phase of the
sun.

He is free to explain the observations (quantitatively!) based on that
idea.


[snip more nonsense]


Bye,
Bjoern

You didn't read whole arguments newedana said. Do you belive that the
lightest elements such as hydrogen, deuterium and helium atom can
gather to a place without compressing them? If you belives so how do
you explain the decrement of entrophy, and a baloon filled with such
gases turns out to explode at high altitude of the air phase? How can
the sun collect such cosmic gases from the space for fuel of its
nuclear fusion? Don't believe blindly the ridiculous assumptions of
pioneer of physics, particularly the particle physicists. newedana says
to Bjoen Feuerbacher

newedana wrote:
You didn't read whole arguments newedana said.

It contained no quantitative description and no evidence. Merely
unsupported assertions and word salad. As usual.


Do you belive that the
lightest elements such as hydrogen, deuterium and helium atom can
gather to a place without compressing them?

If there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.


If you belives so how do
you explain the decrement of entrophy,

If gravity draws them to each other, entropy does not decrease. Do the
math.


and a baloon filled with such
gases turns out to explode at high altitude of the air phase?

Try to understand pressure.


How can
the sun collect such cosmic gases from the space for fuel of its
nuclear fusion?

The sun doesn't collect cosmic gases for fusion. Where did you get
that strange idea from?

The sun contained the gases which now undergo fusion right from its birth!


Don't believe blindly the ridiculous assumptions of
pioneer of physics,

Like Dr. Yoon.


particularly the particle physicists.

I don't blindly believe particle physicists. I look at the data they
provide, and compare them with the theoretical predictions.

When will Dr. Yoon start doing that?


Bye,
Bjoern

there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.

It appears you do not know both the gravitation and coulomb's law. If
you camculate the ratio of gravitation and repulsion acting between two
electrons using these two equations, the repulsion between them comes
out as 4.17x10^41 times as great as the gravitation. Do you still
believe these lightest atoms or molecules can gather automatically to a
place? All QM man believe like that way? Bha!

newedana wrote:
there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.

It appears you do not know both the gravitation and coulomb's law.

Suggestion: don't always search for the error on *my* side when you
disagree with something I wrote.


If you camculate the ratio of gravitation and repulsion acting between two
electrons using these two equations, the repulsion between them comes
out as 4.17x10^41 times as great as the gravitation.

Indeed. Your point? What has that to do with *atoms* coming together???


Do you still
believe these lightest atoms or molecules can gather automatically to a
place?

Indeed, they can, due to gravity. Hint: atoms are neutral. There is no
Coulomb repulsion between them.

Thanks for showing your complete ignorance of basic science, yet again.


All QM man believe like that way? Bha!

You should "Bha!" to yourself.


Bye,
Bjoern

In article .com,
"newedana" wrote:
there is enough of them, gravity will do the job.

It appears you do not know both the gravitation and coulomb's law. If
you camculate the ratio of gravitation and repulsion acting between two
electrons using these two equations, the repulsion between them comes
out as 4.17x10^41 times as great as the gravitation. Do you still
believe these lightest atoms or molecules can gather automatically to a
place? All QM man believe like that way? Bha!


So where are you claiming great numbers of electrons aggregate?

newedana wrote:

This is a recap of messages posted at other threads (such as 'Wave as
Wave, Particle as Particl' 4 May 2005, and 'Yoonatom vs Standard
Model'. 14 May 2005):

Bohr's atomic model and other primitive models like Quantum oscillator
were established before the discovery of neutron in 1934. These atomic
models are imperfect and incorrect even in explaining hydrogen spectrum
in addition to their numerous fallacies.

However, the hydrogen spectrum can be more scientifically analyzed by
Dr. Yoon's physics. The wavelength of all 6 sets of hydrogen spectra,
Humprey, Pfund, Brackett, Ritz-Paschen, Balmer, and Lyman, calculated
by Dr. Hansik Yoon's formula surprisingly coincided with the
experimentally observed ones.

Of course, Dr. Yoon didn't use such unscientific models as QM or
relativity in this calculation. Moreover, his formula estimated
(predicted) other wavelengths not yet observed up to the time. For
example, in the case of Ritz-Paschen series, the estimated wavelengths
were 8201.40 Angstrom,... 8860.40, 9012.5, 9226.6, 9545.97(*),
10049.4(*), 10938.1(*), 12818.1(*), etc. Here, wavelengths with (*)
symbol have been experimentally observed up to the time. In the case of
Lyman series, 911.269A,... 926.226(*), 930.748(*), 937.803(*),
949.743(*), 972.537(*), 1025.722(*), 1215.668(*).

If someone already observed the wavelengths without (*) symbol, try to
observe the Pfund series, 22781.2A, ... 28714.5, 3.375.6, 32952.1,
37385.4, 46525.1(*), 74578.0(*) etc. According to Dr. Yoon's theory on
the hydrogen spectrum, for Lyman series the bombarding electrons must
have a frequency of longitudinal oscillation resonant to the frequency
of 'orbital electron rings' with radial parameter gamma= 1 in order
them to oscillate without destructing it. The energy capacity of
orbital electron ring with radial parameter gamma = 1 that emits Lyman
series of hydrogen spectrum is at least 1295 times greater than the
electron ring with radial parameter gamma=6 that emits Humphrey series.

Quoting Dr. Hansik Yoon's book, "Natural Science Founded on A New
Atomic Model"(www.yoonsatom.net): "If we arrange these 6 sets of
hydrogen spectra on an energy scale based on their wavelengths, we find
an energy interval between each set of these spectral series, as shown
in Fig., and table (a map of spectral series). It signifies that there
exists an energy gap(barrier) between each set of spectra. The largest
energy gap is found between Lyman and Balmer series, the secondary
larger gab is between Balmer and Ritz-Paschen series and no energy gap
between Ritz-Paschen and Brackett series. After Brackett series, we
find that their spectral series turn out to overlap with one another,
and the overlapping zone becomes progressively broader and broader".

He explains for this finding that when the radius of orbital electron
ring expands to be out of the size of emitting Ritz-Paschen and
Brackett series, it can take up electromagnetic radiations without
frequency choice. That is why the spectra emitted by these orbital
electron rings has like a continuous pattern, and any kind of mass
bodies can takes up heat radiation without wavelength choice.

He explains further that as the orbital electron ring shrinks to be
shorter and shorter in reverse, the energy gap increases to be greater
and greater to be reciprocally in proportional to 4 powers of its
radius, and it takes up radiation energy selectively by frequency
choice. It is concerned to directly to black body radiation. And that
is why orbital electron ring becomes increasingly difficult to approach
its nucleus.

He assumed that this energy barrier originates to the restructuring the
texturized electric and magnetic force fluxes produced by orbital
electron rings, as it changes its orbital radius; the shorter the
radius of electron ring the greater the energy input for the
restructuring its electromagnetic force fluxes. When the shrunk orbital
electron ring expands its radius it has to emit reversely this energy
it absorbed. This fact is closely related with atomic fission and
fusion energy. Atomic energy has nothing to do with the stupid
equation, E=mc^2.

Dr. Yoon starts to build the equation of hydrogen spectrum from
differential equation of torsional mass oscillation, since orbital
electron ring is elastically connected to its nucleus, and perform a
precessional oscillation around its nucleus. He applies the classical
rule of one string vibration instead of quantizing electron energy.
Anyway his final equation is, delta-nu = nu-zero[1/r^2-1/(r+n)^2].
Delta-nu: frequency of hydrogen spectrum, nuzero: Rydbery frequency, r:
radial parameter of electron ring, n: precessing parameter.

These two parameters change by integer multiples, due to the frequency
rule of one string vibration. When r =1 it is the shortest radius of
electron ring. We change n, as n =1. 2, 3, 4, ..... by fixing r,
because r does not change until its energy capacity is saturated. Thus
Lyman series is given, including its series limit that is like a
continuous spectrum. The orbital electron ring shrinks from r =6
downward, r=6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 by folding its circumference(electron ring
becomes stiffer and stiffer) when old ring is saturated with absorbed
energy. Thus 6 sets of hydrogen spectrum are given.

He does not accept the spin motion because this motion is imaginary
mathematical motion and invented for Pauli's exclusion principle.
Instead he takes account one or two electrons in an electron ring
sitting opposite side, and exert Meissoner's magnetism with definite
directionality by revolving the same direction, so the revolving
directionality determines the direction of Meissoner's magnetism. He
does not use e=h nu, the basic equation of QM theory.

Dr. Yoon also proves that the light is not a flow of photons in his
work.

Newedana

uhmmm, why has this guy only published two papers in his entire
academic career? how is it that someone (Yoon) who lacks experience and
has made only a miniscule contribution to science suddenly comes up
with an answer to everything (though only according to him because of
his crankiness)