New Physics Based on Yoon's Universal Atomic Model

newedana wrote:

Could you *please* try to get your attributions correct?


How does Dr. Yoon explain the photo effect and the Compton effect?



That is why I recommended you to read Dr.Yoon's book.

I already told you under what conditions I'll look at it.


Dr. Yoon treated with these two monumental works in his book, but he
explained them with his own principles set up without any postulations,
and entirely different from current one,

Does he present mere qualitative, vague handwavings, or actual
*quantitative* descriptions?



saying that readers would be
able to find, how A. Einstein and Compton's explanations for these
physical events are so childish and primitive.

Wow. Insulting two of the greatest known scientists (and essentially
hundreds of thousands of physicists along with them, because they
agree with these explanations) is really a good start when one wants
to propose an alternative explanation.

Tell me, what is "childish" and "primitive" about wave-particle dualism?


Only mathematicians who
do not know what is natural science can do such interpretations,

So mathematics is childish and primitive?

And why does Dr. Yoon think he can judge better than Einstein what
natural science is, and what it isn't?


in order to cheat people in the name of mathematical justification.

So Einstein invented all that stuff merely in order to cheat people?
He was a fraud? Wow. Dr. Yoon really is full of himself.


It signifies that mathematical measurement

What is a "mathematical measurement"?


is not so valuable than true
understanding things qualitatively.

Why does Dr. Yoon think that qualitative handwavings are more valuable
than quantitative scientific descriptions? For starters, with
qualitative handwavings, one can't construct technology.


newedana says to Bjoern Feuerbacher

Yet again displaying his ignorance of science. Yet again refusing to
answer most of my questions. Yet again ignoring most of my arguments.



Bye,
Bjoern

Claims based on stupidity of its author cannot be disputed. Nothing
will convince an idiot.

muha wrote:
Claims based on stupidity of its author cannot be disputed. Nothing
will convince an idiot.

Well, Dr. Yoon *has* obtained somehow a doctorate, so I've still got
some hope that he is *not* a total idiot.

Unfortunately, he is not here himself for debate. And the intelligence
and knowledge level of his disciple "newedana" seems to be quite low...


Bye,
Bjoern

Newedena,

Dr. Yoon doesn't believe in quantum mechanics nor relativity. Does he
believe in the Aether??

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y11...tronfluxes.jpg

Notice that he begins his book by mentioning about electron force
fluxes (or electric field lines) as being like a thing just like a high
speed boat moving across water producing water waves. In his model.
The tails produced intensive magnetic field allegedly explaining all
the
data of experiments. He didn't explain why the force fluxes are
the way he believed them to be. Could he be following the Aether
concept?? In which case, the electric field lines (or force fluxes)
are disturbances in the aether caused by the particle. He mentions
about the waves of moving electrons producing interferences. I haven't
gotten the book as it's just too costly at $180 (maybe you can
convince him to lower it to $25. I wonder how many here actually
bought the book..


Ch.

Michael Faraday thought that electric charge emanates electric force
fluxes in radial symmetric around it, and these force fluxes have
shrinking elasticity. That is why the charge can attract light
substances. This is clearly described in the book with a title 'a
History of the Science' by Stephen F. Mason, published by Macmillan
Publishing Co. You can confirm this. He was really the greatest
physicist in the history. But contemporsry main stream physicists
disregarded him because Faraday was a chemist at the start of his
research life. Perhaps you have learned high school physics. You open
your old text and look again the map of electric force fluxes made
between two counter charges. Dr.Yoon and Michael Faraday thought that
these electric force fluxes are emanated from the charge and they can
move with the moving charge. But your particle physicists thought them
as force lines, and electric attraction between light thigs and counter
charges can occur without any mechanism. Thus your mathematical
physicists established the electric field theory, E=e1 +e2 + e3....+en.
But this field theory is faudulent, since these electric force fluxes
moves with the charge and can shift behind the charge, due to a time
lag between their motion and charge. That is why moving electrons
forming a persistent current in a superconductor never makes their
electric field in the direction perpendicular to its moving path. These
elastic force fluxes make electrons perform a longitudinal oscillation,
which can generate an electromagnetic wave. Charged particles or
electrons can never travel by inertial motion in vacant space, because
the eletric force fluxes emanated from them makes them to emit
radiation energy. It is energy dumping behavior of moving charge when
accelerated. Thus A. Einstein's theory, difficulty of accelerating
charged particle at near the speed of light, is not due to increase of
its absolute mass, but is due to energy dumping behavior of charged
particles when accelerated.

When a charge is at rest numerous electric force fluxes emerged from
it stretche in straight in radial symmetric around it, inducing no
magnetism. However if it moves rapidly these electric force fluxes
being shifed behind it and being polarized to induce magnetic force
fluxes.It is because there is a time lag between the moving speed of
charge and its electric force fluxes.( Do you want evidence?
Electromagnetic wave is built with modulated electric and magnetic
force fluxes forming wave phases, right? There exists evidently a time
lag between the oscillatory speed of electron and moving speed of
electromagnetic force fluxes it emits.) The faster the speed of moving
charge the smaller the solid angle made between individual force
fluxes, and finally turn out to make parallel orientation when the
charge attains at utmost speed. Such is the case electrons build a
persistent current. Upon these polarized electric force fluxes magnetic
force fluxes are induced and wrap them from outside. Thus these two
forces are in balance in relation with the moving speed of charge. This
is all written in Dr.Yoon's book. Don't compare his electric force
fluxes with Commet tail.
newedana says to charlie

I haven't gotten the book as it's just too costly at $180 (maybe you
can
convince him to lower it to $25. I wonder how many here actually
bought the book..

A great number of people at present who bought his book, and the
numbe would increase limitlessly as years go. His book has no
postulation at all in explaining almost evergy field of natural
science. I sow he was laughing at main streme physicists, saying that
wild dogs bark to the moon because they do not know what is the moon.

I bought his book because his book will become a worldwide standard
textbook soon because it can surely contribute to give a fresh new idea
to those who work day and night for the development of their technology
almost in evergy field. I heard some news already from a researcher who
red his book got a great idea in improving the reproducibility of cold
fusion experiment. I believe this book deserves more than 180$ .
Allegedly statistical QM theory cannot attract technician's attension
because it produces a great deal of meaningless data inaplicable for
practical use. newedana wrote.

newedana wrote:
I haven't gotten the book as it's just too costly at $180 (maybe you
can
convince him to lower it to $25. I wonder how many here actually
bought the book..


A great number of people at present who bought his book,

How many of those actually understand physics?


and the numbe would increase limitlessly as years go.

Probably.


His book has no
postulation at all in explaining almost evergy field of natural
science.

Thanks, we have seen the level of his "explanations".

Other people call that "heaps of unsupported assertions, vague
handwavings and plainly wrong statements".


I sow he was laughing at main streme physicists, saying that
wild dogs bark to the moon because they do not know what is the moon.

And what makes him think that he is so much more intelligent that
all the hundreds of thousands of physicists?

And why does he apparently ignore about 99.9% of the available evidence?



I bought his book because his book will become a worldwide standard
textbook soon

In your dreams.


because it can surely contribute to give a fresh new idea
to those who work day and night for the development of their technology
almost in evergy field.

Why on earth do you think so?


I heard some news already from a researcher who
red his book got a great idea in improving the reproducibility of cold
fusion experiment.

ROTFL! Yes, that's a *great* example for the level of science in Dr.
Yoons book!


I believe this book deserves more than 180$.

And why do you think you are in the position to judge the validity of
this ideas?


Allegedly statistical QM theory cannot attract technician's attension
because it produces a great deal of meaningless data inaplicable for
practical use.

Maybe. You conveniently ignore that it *also* procudes at least as
much meaning*ful* data *applicable* for practical use.


Bye,
Bjoern

So mathematics is childish and primitive?
So Einstein invented all that stuff merely in order to cheat people?
He was a fraud?

Mathematics is very very honest so garbage in garbage out, and not
primitive and childish, but user's way of thinking for these two
physical events was chilish and primitive.

Yes! But I dont think he intended to cheat people, but unfortunately
he resulted to cheat people with his childish idea. Dr,Yoon said in his
book it is not only these two case but also all the other principles
established by him are froudulent! newedana says to Bjoen Feurbacher

newedana wrote:

Could you *please* try to get your attributions right?

And could you please tell me why you yet again ignored all my
questions for evidence and quantitative descriptions?


So mathematics is childish and primitive?
So Einstein invented all that stuff merely in order to cheat people?
He was a fraud?


Mathematics is very very honest so garbage in garbage out,

Interesting. Other crackpots keep saying that one get out anything of
maths that one wants.


and not
primitive and childish, but user's way of thinking for these two
physical events was chilish and primitive.

I asked you:
"What is "childish" and "primitive" about wave-particle dualism?"

Care to answer that?



Yes! But I dont think he intended to cheat people, but unfortunately
he resulted to cheat people with his childish idea.

I asked you:
"What is "childish" and "primitive" about wave-particle dualism?"

Care to answer that?


Dr,Yoon said in his
book it is not only these two case but also all the other principles
established by him are froudulent!

The principles he established are fraudulent, although he not intended
to cheat people?

Say, do you plan to make sense *ever*?



Bye,
Bjoern