![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"James" wrote:
Two years of testing since the loss of the Columbia and its crew of seven have shown that the shuttle's skin, designed primarily to resist the blistering heat of re-entry, is far more vulnerable to debris from the external fuel tank than had been thought. And why the hell is this? Why don't they know exactly what kind of damage the skin can take? This is inexcusable. Inexcusable in your dream world maybe. (Actually you share that dream world with a lot of ignorant folks.) Out here in the real world, some degree of imprecision is impossible to escape. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 1 | March 2nd 05 04:35 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 4th 05 04:21 AM |
Early CEV Mission | Blurrt | Policy | 76 | February 5th 04 04:45 PM |
Selected Restricted NASA Videotapes | Michael Ravnitzky | Space Shuttle | 5 | January 16th 04 04:28 PM |
"NASA Chicken" comment in NY TIMES | ElleninLosAngeles | Space Shuttle | 1 | August 5th 03 09:08 PM |